230 likes | 452 Views
Existential Out. The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS. Existential Out. The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS . #x(Bx&Mx) Some BUNNIES are MARRIED. Ba&Ma Anne is a married bunny. INVALID!. Existential Out. The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS .
E N D
Existential Out The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS.
Existential Out The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS. #x(Bx&Mx) Some BUNNIES are MARRIED. Ba&Ma Anne is a married bunny. INVALID!
Existential Out The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS. #x(Bx&Mx) Some BUNNIES are MARRIED. Bn&Mn n is a married bunny. BARELY OK Provided that n is a brand new name.
Existential Out The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS. #x(Bx&Mx) Some BUNNIES are MARRIED. Bn&Mn n is a married bunny. BARELY OK n is like a new social security number.
Existential Out The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS. #x(Bx&Mx) Some BUNNIES are MARRIED. Bn&Mn n is a married bunny. BARELY OK n is like a new social security number.
Existential Out The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS. #x(Bx&Mx) Some BUNNIES are MARRIED. Bn&Mn n is a married bunny. WATCH OUT! There are extra deductions for violating the restriction on the EO rule.
Existential Out The Existential Out rule is DANGEROUS. #x(Bx&Mx) Some BUNNIES are MARRIED. Bn&Mn n is a married bunny. WATCH OUT! There are extra deductions for violating the restriction on the EO rule. The EO Restriction: The letter chosen for the instance must be new to the proof.
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A -$x(Bx>Vx) GOAL
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba>Va 3 $O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba>Va 3 $O 7) Ba 4 &O 8) Ma 4 &O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba>Va 3 $O 7) Ba 4 &O 8) Ma 4 &O 9) Va 6,7 >O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba>Va 3 $O 7) Ba 4 &O 8) Ma 4 &O 9) Va 6,7 >O 10) -Va 5,8 >O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
Sample Proof 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba>Va 3 $O 7) Ba 4 &O 8) Ma 4 &O 9) Va 6,7 >O 10) -Va 5,8 >O 11) Va&-Va 9,10 &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-11 -I
EO Strategy 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
EO Strategy 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba>Va 3 $O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
EO Strategy 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba>Va 3 $O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba&Ma 1 #O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I
EO Strategy 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba>Va 3 $O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba&Ma 1 #O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I #O Restriction VIOLATED!
EO Strategy 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba>Va 3 $O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba&Ma 1 #O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I #O Restriction VIOLATED! ADVICE: DO #O FIRST!
EO Strategy 1) #x(Bx&Mx) A 2) $x(Mx>-Vx) A 3) $x(Bx>Vx) PA 4) Ba&Ma 1 #O 5) Ma>-Va 2 $O 6) Ba>Va 3 $O ?&-? ?,? &I -$x(Bx>Vx) 3-? -I #O Restriction VIOLATED! ADVICE: DO #O FIRST! For more click here