1 / 8

Request for Project Planning: Centralized Electronics Records Repository (CERR)

Request for Project Planning: Centralized Electronics Records Repository (CERR) NM DoIT PCC Presentation July 2013. Presented by: John Hyrum Martinez and Pete Chacon Prepared by: SRCA CERR Core Team – Pete Chacon, Leo Lucero, Melissa Salazar, Jane Betterton. Project Abstract.

xannon
Download Presentation

Request for Project Planning: Centralized Electronics Records Repository (CERR)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Request for Project Planning: Centralized Electronics Records Repository (CERR) NM DoIT PCC Presentation July 2013 Presented by: John Hyrum Martinez and Pete Chacon Prepared by: SRCA CERR Core Team – Pete Chacon, Leo Lucero, Melissa Salazar, Jane Betterton

  2. Project Abstract • The purpose of this project is to fully implement a Centralized Electronic Records Repository (CERR) for the State of New Mexico. The CERR will provide the Commission of Public Records - State Records Center and Archives (SRCA) the means to manage inactive electronic public records for specified, predetermined periods of time commensurate with their value, and subsequent disposal as determined by state laws and records retention and disposition schedules. • The Public Records Act (14-3-1 through 14-3-23, NMSA 1978) provides for the establishment of records management programs by the State Records Administrator to ensure the efficient and economical management of public records by state agencies.

  3. Appropriation History

  4. Planning Funding Request

  5. Initiation Status Update • August, 2012: Request for Project Initiation release of $75.0/$50.0 spent to date. • November, 2012 - Project manager contract negotiated with ABBA Technologies, Jane Betterton PMP selected. • November 2012 - Present: CERR Project Team meeting regularly to discuss path to implementation. • Feb-April 2013 – SRCA E-mail and electronic document lifecycle testing using HP TRIM. • May-July 2013 – Conduct IV&V Vendor Interviews. • July 2013 – PCC request to transition into Planning Phase and release of funds. • AgencyImplementation Approach – A Model agency (SRCA) and a Pilot agency will be the first to implement the CERR in FY14. Additional agencies will be deployed in FY15.

  6. Planning Phase – Schedule • July 2013: Request for Project Planning Release of $160.0 • August- September 2013 – IV&V Vendor selected and contract negotiated. Project Manager contract negotiated. • August - September 2013 – HP TRIM Vendor selected and contract negotiated to perform Current State Assessment, Analysis of Models, and Technical Architecture document (model dependent) • September- October 2013 – Integrator work on Current State Assessment & Analysis of Models. • October – November 2013 – Implementation Model for CERR selected. Technical Architecture document work begins. • December 2013 – Target for PCC review and request for funds to move into Implementation Phase. • January – June 2014 – Integration of SRCA Model Agency and Pilot agency into CERR.

  7. CERR Implementation Models #1 New Mexico Model: SRCA provides all services. #2 Oregon Model: Vendor provides Software as a Service (SaaS), data is stored in a private government cloud located in Oregon. Vendor purchases all hardware and software and charges a per user fee. #3 Wyoming/Vendor Model: Vendor provides integration, training, user support, and bills agencies per user. Wyoming hosts data, purchases all software and hardware. #4 New Mexico/Vendor Model: Same as Model #3 or some variation of this model where ownership of the hardware and software is determined during Planning Phase.

  8. Q & A Thank You!

More Related