310 likes | 437 Views
2. This Session Will Focus On:. EPSDTExpanded Medicaid coverage for kids under 21Expanded coverage of AT for kids under 21. 3. This Session Based on Winter 2008 AT Advocate. Extensive citationsOn Conference CDAvailable at: www.nls.org/av/winter08.pdfHard copies sent to PAAT staff. 4. Ov
E N D
1. MEDICAID, AT, and KIDS James R. Sheldon, Jr., Supervising Attorney,
National AT Advocacy Project
Diana M. Straube, Attorney,
National AT Advocacy Project
2. 2 This Session Will Focus On: EPSDT
Expanded Medicaid coverage for kids under 21
Expanded coverage of AT for kids under 21
3. 3 This Session Based on Winter 2008 AT Advocate Extensive citations
On Conference CD
Available at: www.nls.org/av/winter08.pdf
Hard copies sent to PAAT staff
4. 4 Overview of the Medicaid Program Joint federal-state venture
Participating state must comply with federal statute and regulations.
Services must be:
sufficient in amount, duration and scope
to reasonably achieve their purpose [42.C.F.R. § 440.230(b)]
5. 5 “Reasonably Achieve Their Purpose” Whose purposes are to be served (i.e., state’s versus federal)? Courts are divided.
6. 6 Required Medical Services Include:
inpatient hospital
outpatient hospital services
nursing facility services
physician services
laboratory and x-ray services
7. 7 States May Provide Optional Services, Including: physical and occupational therapy
dental services
prescribed drugs
prosthetics
private duty nursing
8. 8 Is “Home Health Service” and Therefore DME, a Mandatory or Optional Category? Courts are divided.
A state plan must provide “home health services” to any individual eligible for skilled nursing services.
Skilled nursing services is a mandatory service for categorically eligible individuals.
Advocates have argued: DME is therefore a mandatory service.
But, some courts have held that DME is optional.
9. 9 An Item of Assistive Technology May Fit Within More Than One Medical Service Category: Wheelchair may be:
DME
Prosthetic
10. 10 Must “Optional” Services Be Sufficient in Amount, Duration, and Scope? Some courts have said “yes”
See, Lankford v. Sherman, 451 F.3d 496 (8th cir. 2006)
11. 11 History of EPSDT Program Congress passed amendments to the Medicaid Act in 1967:
Created a category of services called the Early, Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program
Applies to Medicaid recipients under the age of 21
12. 12 EPSDT Amendment Provided For: Early and periodic screening and diagnosis to ascertain physical or mental defects, and
Such health care, treatment or other measures to correct or ameliorate defects and chronic conditions discovered by the screen
Purpose was to diagnose and treat conditions early, before they become more complex and expensive
13. 13 Amendments of the Medicaid Act in 1989 Strengthened and Expanded EPSDT States required to provide EPSDT services “whether or not such services are covered under the State plan”. 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r)(5)
All optional services become mandatory services for Medicaid recipients under the age of 21
14. 14 EPSDT Program Is Comprehensive and Preventative Health Care Program outreach and informing
screening
diagnosis
treatment
adequate provider participation
reporting
15. 15 Assessments (Screenings) Must Include the Following Elements: gross and fine motor development
communication skills or language development
self-help or self-care skills
social-emotional development
ability to engage in social interaction
cognitive skills, focusing on problem solving or reasoning
16. 16 As Children Age, Assessments Should Include: visual-motor integration
visual-spatial organization
visual sequencing processing skills
auditory sequential memory
17. 17 Assessments for Adolescents Should Include: identification of potential learning disabilities
peer relations
psychological/psychiatric problems
vocational skills
18. 18 EPSDT Broadens Definition of “Medical Necessity” maximize child’s opportunity for cognitive development
allow him to be more responsible for own self-care and safety
foster his learning capacity
foster his general ability to explore his environment “as is necessary for any child his age”
19. 19 C.F. v. Dept of Children and Families, 934 S.2d 1 (Fla.App.2005) State is required to provide services that support and sustain rather than treat.
State failed to incorporate EPSDT requirements into definition of “medical necessity.”
20. 20 S.D. ex rel Dickson v. Hood, 391 F.3d 581 (5th Cir. 2004) Without incontinence supplies child would be homebound, isolated, unable to attend school, or engage in other age-appropriate activities.
Congress did not grant states discretion to define the types of services available pursuant to EPSDT.
21. 21 Matter of John, NY FH # 4337314K Decision rejected agency’s argument that child always had a caregiver present who could push him.
Continued reliance on caregivers to push him would be developmentally inappropriate for child.
22. 22 Department of Community Health v. Freels, 576 S.E.2d 2 (Ga. 2002) Federal law did not require proof that:
hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is the accepted standard of medical practice, or
that it meets the definition of medical necessity reserved for adult Medicaid recipients
23. 23 Jackson v. Millstone, 801 A.2d 1034 (Md. 2002) Two children required life-saving liver transplants.
Medicaid approved funding for one, and
denied funding for the other, claiming a transplant was not “appropriate” because of two prior failed transplants.
24. 24 EPSDT Mandates a Broad Range of Services Some categories that might include AT:
25. 25 CMS Policy Letters March 7, 1996;
“State Agency Letter Number 93-25.
Devices that fall directly under a service category and determined to be medically necessary must be provided to Medicaid recipients under the age of 21.
26. 26 CMS Policy Letters,continued Pursuant to EPSDT, following services are available
if medically necessary:
27. 27 Enforcement of EPSDT State court enforcement of state and federal claims;
28. 28 Statutes: 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10)(A), (D)
42 U.S.C. § 1396d(a)(1)-(5), (17), (21)
42 U.S.C. § 1396d(a)(4)(B)
42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r)(5)
42 U.S.C. § 1396d(a)(7), (11), (12), (13)
29. 29 Regulations: 42 C.F.R. §§ 440.10-440.50, 440.210, 440.165, 440.166
42 C.F.R. § 440.70(b)(3)
42 C.F.R. § 440.110
42 C.F.R. § 440.230
42 C.F.R. § 441.50 et seq
42 C.F.R. § 441.56
30. 30 Cases: Friedman v. Berger, 409 F. Supp. 1225-26 (D.C.N.Y. 1976)
Friedman v. Berger, 547 F.2d 724, 727, N. 7 (2nd Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 984 (1977)
Charpentier v. Kizer, 1990 WL 252191 (E.D. Cal. 1990)
Ohlson v. Weil, 953 P.2d 939 (Colo. App. 1997)
Fred C. v. Texas Health & Human Services Comm, 924 F. Supp. 788 (W.D. Tex. 1996)
William T. ex rel Gigi T. v. Taylor, 465 F. Supp. 2d 1267 (N.D. Ga. 2000)
31. 31 Cases, continued Meyers by Walden v. Reagan, 776 F.2d 241 (8th Cir. 1985)
Lankford v. Sherman, 451 F.3d 496, 511 (8th Cir. 2006)
Brisson v. Dept. of Social Welfare, 701 A.2d 405 (Vt. 1997)
Callen v. Rogers, 168 P.3d 907 (Az. App. Div 1, 2007)
Esteban v. Cook, 77 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (S.D. Fl. 1999)
Frew v. Gilbert, 109 F. Supp. 2d 579, 662 (E.D. Tex. 2000)