1 / 40

Innovative and practical issues of multi-criteria decision-making in the supply chain management

Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 . Innovative and practical issues of multi-criteria decision-making in the supply chain management. Prof. Valerio Salomon Sao Paulo State University, Brasil www.feg.unesp.br /~ salomon. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 .

xenon
Download Presentation

Innovative and practical issues of multi-criteria decision-making in the supply chain management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Innovative and practical issues of multi-criteria decision-making in the supply chain management Prof. Valerio Salomon Sao Paulo State University, Brasil www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  2. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Innovative and practical issues of multi-criteria decision-making in the supply chain management Outline of presentation Conceptual background Validation of an MCDM method application Compatibility Indexes Supply chain management www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  3. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Who won the Winter 2010 Olympics? A quest into priorities and rankings J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal. (Saaty, 2010) Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy from a new perspective Int. J. Inf. Tech. Decis. (Saaty &Zoffer, 2011) An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts Eur. J. Oper. Res. (Saaty & Shang, 2011) www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  4. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Who won the Winter 2010 Olympics? www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  5. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Who won the Winter 2010 Olympics? CAN 28x8 USA. p-value = 0.000156282 < 0.0004 www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  6. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Who won the Winter 2010 Olympics? Priorities used to rank: ( 50%, 33%, 17% ) / (68%, 23%, 9%) bob.condron@usoc.org / AHP www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  7. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background The Summer 2016 Olympics hosted city decision A Ranking Reversal case www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  8. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  9. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  10. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy Comparisons of the criteria for Israeli’s benefits from Palestinian concessions www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  11. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy Ratings scale for concession evaluation www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  12. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy Israeli’s benefits from Palestinians’ concessions www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  13. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy Retributive function ≅ 1 www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  14. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy Matching concessions with corresponding gain/loss ratios in first meeting www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  15. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background Negotiating the Israeli–Palestinian controversy Matching concessions with corresponding gain/loss ratios in second meeting www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  16. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  17. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  18. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  19. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Conceptual background An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  20. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Validation of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Validation as a concept. Decision-making as a process Performance of an MCDM method application Saaty’s, Garuti’s, and Salomon’s Compatibility Indexes Input Process Output www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  21. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Quality of the decision-making process Decision Aid or Decision Support Decision Making Validation of a decision SIPOC (Suppliers, inputs, process, outputs, customers) is a Six Sigma tool. It was invented by Prof. Edwards Deming in the 1950’s, the legend goes. www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  22. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Quality of the decision-making process Culture, Environment, Interests, Law, etc. Morita, H. Contribution to decision process analysis of unstructured problems. PhD dissertation. S. Paulo: USP, 2003 [In Portuguese]. www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  23. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Performance of an MCDM method application Q Quantity of data S Compatibility Index Paula, D.C.; Salomon, V.A.P. Using indicators in the performance analysis of multiple criteria decision-making methods application. Proceedings of XL SBPO. J. Pessoa: SOBRAPO, 2007 [In Portuguese]. www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  24. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Performance of an MCDM method application www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  25. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Saaty’s and Salomon’s Compatibility indexes Three compatible vectors S = 1.63 S = 2.53 V = 1 www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  26. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Garuti’s Compatibility index Three compatible vectors G = .93 G = .98 www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  27. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Supply Chain Management Supplier selection of blanking dies Distribution center location Selection of third-party logistic provider www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  28. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Supplier selection of blanking dies www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  29. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Supplier selection of blanking dies www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  30. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Supplier selection of blanking dies www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  31. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Supplier selection of blanking dies www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  32. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Supplier selection of blanking dies www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  33. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Distribution center location www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  34. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Distribution center location Delivery time in days www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  35. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Distribution center location www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  36. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Distribution center location Results with AHP application www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  37. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Distribution center location www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  38. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Distribution center location Results with AHP application G = .72S = 1.08 www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  39. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Selection of third-party logistic provider www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

  40. Workshop AHP/ANP ITA 2011 Selection of third-party logistic provider G = .94 www.feg.unesp.br/~salomon

More Related