1 / 22

Synergies and tensions in using multiple methods to study vulnerability - asking questions

Paper presented to Research Methods Programme Conference, Manchester: Mixed-methods: identifying the issues 27th October 2005. Synergies and tensions in using multiple methods to study vulnerability - asking questions.

xiang
Download Presentation

Synergies and tensions in using multiple methods to study vulnerability - asking questions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Paper presented to Research Methods Programme Conference, Manchester: Mixed-methods: identifying the issues 27th October 2005 Synergies and tensions in using multiple methods to study vulnerability - asking questions Jane Fielding, Jo Moran-Ellis, Victoria D. Alexander, Ann Cronin, Hilary Thomas Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH.

  2. Applied setting – Local government • ‘evidence’ based policy in a local setting • Use variety of data sources to plan and deliver their policies • National statistics • Commissioned surveys and qualitative research eg interviews, focus groups • Audits and mapping exercises • Consultation • Citizen panels J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  3. Use the data sources to answer questions • Draw on research techniques • Use multiple methods to address complex questions • What is the relationship between question and the method(s) in this context? • Are there implications from this for academic use of multiple methods? J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  4. Basis of our contribution • PPIMs project included interviews with local government officers about their use of research in planning • Overlap in concept of vulnerability • Parallels in types of data sources used in PPIMs study and used by policy makers/planners J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  5. PPIMs studyPractice and Process in Integrating Methodologies 5 small-scale projects encompassing • Secondary analysis of existing quantitative data for the relevant neighbourhoods (Geographical/Area level data) • 3 sets of Qualitative interviews with individuals: • Whole Households: all household members • Solo living respondents • Homeless people • Visual methods: photographs and video data with individuals • Range of respondents derived from individual interviews J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  6. Vulnerability • Important for the business of local government • Who is vulnerable in Hilltown and can they be helped? • Do people living in this area feel it is a safe place to live? • Does current local housing policy meet the housing needs of minority ethnic people in this area? • Can be looked at using quantitative or qualitative approaches • Valuable to do both but each asks different sorts of questions… J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  7. Thinking about questions: • In academic terms issues concerning • Paradigms • Theories • Methods • Analytic approaches • Attempts to classify them and their relationship with methods/methodologies J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  8. Questions and methods Conventionally… • Quantitative questions – quantitative methods • Fixed, developed from theory • Directional…describe a relationship between variables often with a temporal causal ordering • Positivism • Qualitative questions – qualitative methods • Open-ended, RQs may evolve during course of study -emerging • Non-directional • Symbolic interactionism J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  9. Aim of quantitative questions • Descriptive: What? How many? • Relational : Comparing groups • Explanatory or Causal: Search for causes or effects/ test hypotheses J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  10. Aim of qualitative questions • Describe the experience (phenomenology) What? • How? Discover (grounded theory) Why? • Explore a process (case study) • Explain or seek to understand (Ethnography) J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  11. paradigms theories literature method Research Question(s) J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  12. Multiple methods/data • All this and… • elements intrinsic to multi-methods research additionally impact on the relationship with the questions addressed J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  13. Methods Different Paradigms Phenomena Different Different Similar Same Same Simultaneous Equal Interactive Unequal Sequential Status Sequencing Independent Inter-dependence J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  14. But does this capture what the relationship is in this applied setting? • No! in some ways it is less complicated • Could categorise • Quantitative and qualitative but • questions addressed better understood in terms of emic and etic perspectives J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  15. Emic • Inside; culture’s own terms • Etic • Outside; universal J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  16. Examples of etic questions and measures Demographic characteristics and relationship to ‘vulnerability’ Eg age, ethnicity, socio-economic status, gender “Who is vulnerable in Hilltown?” Vulnerability itself becomes specified as at risk of an external threat or negative event; defined at group level; aligned with quantification Eg Crime, ill-health, housing need, flooding J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  17. Types of data used for etic questions • Census data • National data sets (eg GHS) • National statistical returns (eg Crime statistics for HO) • Published research findings • Local surveys (primary data) • Local statistics (secondary/primary data) • Questions are • Specific • Determined at start • limited by what is available eg area; analysis unit J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  18. Examples of emic questions How vulnerability is experienced at an individual level, and how people manage their vulnerabilities Eg vulnerability as a contingent experience “do people living in Hilltown feel safe?” Vulnerability is left unspecified and is seen as a name for an experience arising out of the meanings and interpretations people make of situations in their lives or that they encounter. An individual level experience; aligned with qualitative data. Eg feeling safe. J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  19. Types of data used for emic questions • Qualitative interviews • Focus groups • ‘consultation’ • Visual data • Published research • Questions are • Not specific • Evolving over the course of the research • Limited by what is available eg funding (primary data) J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  20. What happens when brought together? • Synergies but also possible tensions! • Methodological • Differing findings • Unit of analysis • Political • Outside remit of LA • Preference/requirements of ‘audiences’ • timing • Practical • Time • Money • Age of data J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  21. Resolutions ‘on the ground’ • Etic measures of the emic? • Subordinate and dominate (emic to etic)? • Tendency to produce a particular kind of multi methods outcome? • etic ‘mode’ of local government J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

  22. What might this mean for academic research (if anything!)? • Emic and etic as a more productive way of thinking about methods and questions? • less rigidity about relationship? • clearer relationship between researcher and the research enterprise? J. Moran-Ellis; J.Fielding; V.D. Alexander; A. Cronin; H.Thomas

More Related