330 likes | 1.02k Views
Aquatic fungi and their role in leaf breakdown . Katie Seymore. Outline. Two different aquatic fungi Leaf breakdown and fungi Bacteria and fungi relationship The essential role of leaf conditioning. Two key groups. Aquatic hyphomycetes and aero-aquatic fungi Form-class fungi
E N D
Aquatic fungi and their role in leaf breakdown Katie Seymore
Outline • Two different aquatic fungi • Leaf breakdown and fungi • Bacteria and fungi relationship • The essential role of leaf conditioning
Two key groups • Aquatic hyphomycetes and aero-aquatic fungi • Form-class fungi • Most Ascomycetes, fewer Basidiomycetes, one Oomycete • Secondarily adapted to aquatic life • Convergent evolution events • Similar ecological roles • Leaf breakdown
Aquatic hyphomycetes • First described by Ingold in the 1940’s • Produce and release spores underwater • Mostly in streams- moving, oxygenated water Conidia
Aero-aquatic fungi • Described by Beverwijk 1950’s • Amphibious • Propagules trap air and float for dispersal • Mostly in temporary waters, low oxygen
Amphibious fungi Fall- conidia germinating Winter/spring- grow Summer- make propagules
Propagules • Trap air • Hydrophobic encrustation • Many different forms
Leaf Breakdown • Important ecological role • Release nutrients to aquatic ecosystems • Increase leaf’s N content • Lowers leaf mass • Amount of lignin (polymer in cells walls) content controls how fast leaf decomposes • available carbon • Tannins amounts also big deal (phenol compounds)
Fungi and Leaves • Overall generalists • Can specialize • Combined exoenxzymes of all fungi on a leaf help speed breakdown • Linked mycelium • Two different leaves • Help by Sharing • Harm by sending incorrect cues to healthy mycelium
Bacteria and Fungi • Bacteria are often talked about, but have only a small role • Bacteria cannot penetrate leaf, only on outside • Fungi are 95% of microbial biomass • Fungi perform better without bacteria • Bacteria has little growth without the presence of fungi • secondary compounds
Fungi and Leaf Conditioning • Key links in the food web • Breakdown tough compounds in the leaves • Different leaves condition at different times • Make leaves suitable for detritivores, like caddisflies
Caddisflies and Fungi • Caddisflies consume leaf parts • but really, the fungi in the leaf is more nutritious then the leaf itself • Caddisflies taste test leaves • Will avoid unconditioned parts, eat only the best spots
Unhelpful fungi • Leaves can be over conditioned by fungi • Out of nutrients • Fungi dead • Mycotoxins • Instead of conditioning the leaf, some fungi make it less palatable • Defense against getting eaten
Fungi are important for ecosystems • Allochthonous material very important for aquatic food webs • Organisms in vernal ponds have limited time to grow before ponds dry out, so any increase in food quality helps! • Fungi play a role in food availability throughout the year with different conditioning times for different leaves
Conclusion • Two main forms of aquatic fungi • Awesome convergent evolution • Important for food supply in aquatic ecosystems • Key to nutrient release and detrital breakdown
Works cited Pictures • http://www.botanik.univie.ac.at/mycology/images/PosterOslo.jpg • footage.shutterstock.com • http://ww2.coastal.edu/vgulis/conidia.htm • http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm • http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm • www.thinklongislandfirst.com • http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/VernalPool_Ecology.aspx • http://fungi.life.illinois.edu/about/mitosporic_fungi • http://super-mario-world.webnode.com.br/products/random-images-4/
Works Cited • Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1984. Leaf Processing Capabilities of Aquatic Hyphomycetes: Interspecific Differences and Influenceon Shredder Feeding Preferences. Oikos, 42(2): 144-154. • Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1985. Selective Feeding by Stream Caddisfly (Trichoptera) Detritivores on Leaves with Fungal-Colonized Patches. Oikos, 45(1): 50-58. • Butler S.K. and K, Suberkropp. 1986. Aquatic Hyphomycetes on Oak Leaves: Comparison of Growth, Degradation and Palatability. Mycologia, 78(6): 922-928. • Chung, N. and K. Suberkropp. 2009. Contribution of fungal biomass to the growth of the shredder, Pycnopsychegentilis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Freshwater Biology, 54: 2212–2224. • Cohen, J. S., S. Ng and N. Blossey. 2012. Quantity Counts: Amount of Litter Determines Tadpole Performance in Experimental Microcosms. Journal of Herpetology 46(1): 85–90. • Duarte, S., C. Pascoal, F. Cássio and F. Bärlocher. 2006. Aquatic Hyphomycete Diversity and Identity Affect Leaf Litter Decomposition in Microcosms. Oecologia, 147(4): 658-666. • Gessner M.O. and E. Chauvet.1994. Ecology Importance of Stream Microfungi in Controlling Breakdown Rates of Leaf Litter., 75(6):1807-1817. • Golladay, S. W., J. R. Webster and E. F. Benfield. 1983. Factors Affecting Food Utilization by a Leaf Shredding Aquatic Insect: Leaf Species and Conditioning Time. Holarctic Ecology 6(2): 157-162 • Gulis V. and K. Suberkropp. 2003. Effect of Inorganic Nutrients on Relative Contributions of Fungi and Bacteria to Carbon Flow from Submerged Decomposing Leaf Litter. Microbial Ecology, 45(1): 11-19. • Hutchens, J. J., E.F. Benfield and J. R. Webster. 1997. Diet and Growth of a Leaf-shredding Caddisfly in Southern Appalachian Streams of Contrasting Disturbance History. Hydrobiologia 346: 193–201. • Inkley, M.D., S.A. Wissinger, and B.L. Baros. 2008. Effects of drying regime on microbial colonization and shredder preference in seasonal woodland wetlands. Freshwater Biology 53: 435–445. • Maerz, J.C., J. S. Cohen and B. Blossey. 2010. Does Detritus Quality Predict the Effect of Native and Nonnative Plants on the Performance of Larval Amphibians? Freshwater Biology 55: 1694–1704. • Markovskaja S. 2012. Aero-Aquatic fungi Colonizing Decaying leaves in woodland swampy • Pools of Aukstadvaris Regional Park (Lithuania). BotanicaLithuanica, 18(2): 123–132. • Premdas P. D. and B. Kendrick. 1991. Colonization of Autumn-Shed Leaves by Four Aero- • Aquatic Fungi. Mycologia, 83(3): 317-321. • Romaní, A.M., H. Fischer, C. Mille-Lindblom and L. J. Tranvik. 2006. Interactions of Bacteria and Fungi on Decomposing Litter: Differential Extracellular Enzyme Activities. Ecology, 87(10): 2559-2569. • Schindler M. H. and M.O. Gessner. 2009. Functional Leaf Traits and Biodiversity Effects on Litter Decomposition in a Stream Ecology, 90(6): 1641-1649. • Shearer C.A., E. Descals, B. Kohlmeyer, J. Kohlmeyer, L. Marvanova, D. Padgett, D.Porter, H. A. Raja, J.P. Schmit, H. A. Thorton, and H.Voglymayr.2007. Fungal biodiversity in aquatic habitats. Biodiversity Conservation, 16:49–67. • Smyers, S.D., B. A. Trowbridge and B.O. Butler. 2011. Leaf Diet Affects Growth of a Shredder, Limnephilusindivisus, from a Seasonal New England Pond. Northeastern Naturalist 18(1): 27-36. • Voglmayr, H. 2004 Spirosphaeracupreorufescenssp. nov., a rare aeroaquatic fungus. Studies in Mycology, 50: 221–228. • Wang, Z., M. Binder and D. S. Hibbett. 2005. Life History and Systematics of the Aquatic DiscomyceteMitrula (Helotiales, Ascomycota)Based on Cultural, Morphological, and Molecular Studies. American Journal of Botany, 92(9): 1565-1574. • Wurzbacher C.M., F. Barlocher, and H. Grossart. 2010. Fungi in lake ecosystems. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 59:125-149.