1 / 16

The Mobile Van Approach

The Mobile Van Approach. Wyoming Institute for Disabilities (WIND) WIND Assistive Technology Resources (WATR) Nationwide interview study January 2005. The Mobile Van Approach.

xuxa
Download Presentation

The Mobile Van Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Mobile Van Approach Wyoming Institute for Disabilities (WIND) WIND Assistive Technology Resources (WATR) Nationwide interview study January 2005

  2. The Mobile Van Approach A Nationwide Survey Studying the Use and Effectiveness of Mobile Van Units by AT Projects

  3. Background • WIND looked at providing AT services and information statewide via a mobile van approach • In January 2005, a nation-wide survey was conducted

  4. Methodology • Directors of all State AT Projects were contacted and asked the following questions:

  5. Methodology • What services and information were offered through the mobile component of your program? • What were the positive consequences of this approach? • What were the negative consequences of this approach? • What were the complications involved in this approach? • What has led to the program decision to continue or discontinue this approach? • Any advice for using this approach in a frontier setting?

  6. Results • 29 state AT projects responded • 22 of the 29 states that responded did not use the mobile van approach • 7 states did use the mobile van approach: • Colorado • Illinois • Missouri • Nebraska • New Hampshire • New Mexico • North Dakota

  7. Results What services and information were offered through the mobile component of your program? • Fabrication, customization, and installation of AT • Outreach services (assessments, awareness, education, demonstration, etc.) • Both AT fabrication/customization and outreach

  8. Results What were the positive consequences of using a mobile van approach? • Allowed program to access more rural areas • Provided education for public on benefits of assistive technology • Increased public awareness of AT • Allowed for building and nurturing relationships between communities and the AT programs

  9. Results What were the negative consequences of this approach? • Difficult to load for customizations/fabrications • Modifications done in van caused pitting of windshield and melting of floor mats • Space limitations and anchoring of equipment problems when used as a portable demonstration center • Cost-effectiveness*

  10. Results What were the complications involved in using this approach? • Coordinating schedules and trainings • Routine maintenance • Lack of space • Difficult to find qualified staff willing to travel that much

  11. Results What has led to the program’s decision to discontinue this approach? • Cost-effectiveness • Needs not being met by occasional use of van for demonstrations (now use more permanent demonstration center) • Found a different approach to be just as effective with fewer negatives (use of mini-mobile units for customization/fabrication)

  12. Results Any advice for using this approach in a frontier setting? 2 types of responses: • Potential problems • Alternative solutions

  13. Results Potential problems: • Cost (maintenance, van adaptations, replacement of AT) • Coordinating van availability • Lack of demand • Space, anchoring equipment, etc. • Lack of qualified staff willing to travel • May not be enough to meet consumer needs • Over-extending van to accomplish too much may affect quality of work or services

  14. Results Alternative Solutions: • Distance training to address needs of rural community • Create resource centers around the state & utilize video conferencing • Look for corporate sponsorship, charging area distributors to have equipment on board for specialized demonstrations • Use private rentals/personal vehicles as alternative to owning a van • Set up small contracts with existing entities to develop AT access sites

  15. Discussion All states mentioned the following: • Before committing to the purchase of a van, be sure to do a thorough cost-effectiveness study. • Program must know exactly what goals wish to be accomplished through using this approach. • Vans used most effectively in programs focused on fabrication/customization. • Vans used for outreach were all either used minimally or discontinued altogether.

  16. For more information WIND Assistive Technology Resources Sandy Root-Elledge, Program Director (307) 766-2764 sre@uwyo.edu Suzanne Adams, Project Coordinator (307) 766-2051 shadams@uwyo.edu

More Related