1 / 18

Low Impact Development

Low Impact Development. Why and How; What’s Working and What Isn’t. Topics. How Low Impact Development can mitigate effects of urban drainage Applying design criteria for bioretention and harvesting/reuse Why is LID controversial? The LID mandate: Problems and possible solutions.

yair
Download Presentation

Low Impact Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low Impact Development Why and How; What’s Working and What Isn’t

  2. Topics • How Low Impact Development can mitigate effects of urban drainage • Applying design criteria for bioretention and harvesting/reuse • Why is LID controversial? • The LID mandate: Problems and possible solutions

  3. Conventional Urban Drainage • Features • Impervious surfaces: roofs and pavement • Catch basins and piped drainage • “Collect and convey” design objective

  4. Drainage Impacts

  5. LID Design Objectives

  6. LID Drainage Principles • Instead of “collect and convey,” “slow it, spread it, sink it.” • Avoid concentrating flows • Keep drainage areas small • Promote infiltration • Detain • Treat • Route high flows so theyflood safely

  7. LID Design Steps • Optimize the site layout

  8. LID Design Steps • Optimize the site layout • Use pervious surfaces and green roofs where possible

  9. LID Design Steps • Optimize the site layout • Use pervious surfaces and green roofs where possible • Disperse runoff to landscaping

  10. LID Design Steps • Optimize the site layout • Use pervious surfaces and green roofs where possible • Disperse runoff to landscaping • Direct drainage from impervious surfaces to bioretention facilities, flow-through planters, or dry wells

  11. Sizing Treatment Facilities One Acre Vary V until 80% is detained and 20% overflows V 48-hourdrawdown Largest storm retained  85th percentile, 24 hour  0.5" - 1.0" storm depth  0.2 inches per hour

  12. Bioretention evapotranspiration infiltration

  13. Sizing Criterion i = 0.2 inches/hour BMP Area/Impervious Area = 0.2/5 = 0.04 Surface Loading Rate i = 5 inches/hour

  14. Harvesting and Reuse • Facility must fully drain within specified drawdown time • No way to “credit” removal of a portion for reuse unless drawdown is regular and predictable WaterQualityVolume

  15. Harvesting and Reuse

  16. Why is LID Controversial? • Municipalities can pass implementation costs on to developers • With a 4% sizing factor, nearly all projects can implement bioretention • Costs are reasonable (<<1% of project cost) • Bioretention technology is increasingly well-defined and well-known • Bioretention has a strong track record with hundreds of projects of all types built and in operation

  17. Messing with Success • Bioretention not allowed unless infiltration, evapotranspiration, and harvesting/reuse are infeasible • Poorly targeted exceptions for high-density, “smart growth” infill projects • Regulatory rationale: “We have a feeling” • Mandate for off-site and in-lieu programs • Ever-increasing reporting requirements • Invalid technical specifications written into permits

  18. LID: What we need now • Focus on maximizing water quality benefit • Trust and cooperation • Fact-based decision-making • Continuous Improvement • Patience and Fortitude

More Related