1 / 6

APUSH Review: Schenck v. United States (1919)

www.Apushreview.com. APUSH Review: Schenck v. United States (1919). Everything You Need To K now A bout Schenck v. United States To Succeed In APUSH. Key Ideas Before The Case. US entered World War I in 1917 Espionage Act of 1917:

yakov
Download Presentation

APUSH Review: Schenck v. United States (1919)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. www.Apushreview.com APUSH Review: Schenck v. United States (1919) Everything You Need To Know About Schenck v. United States To Succeed In APUSH

  2. Key Ideas Before The Case • US entered World War I in 1917 • Espionage Act of 1917: • Made it illegal to interfere with military operations, including the draft • Illegal “to cause … or incite … insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States” • Sedition Act of 1918: • Made it illegal to criticize the government

  3. Who was Schenck? • Socialist that opposed the war • Schenck passed out flyers urging individuals to resist the draft • Violation of the Espionage Act • Schenck argued the Act violated the 1st amendment • Schenck appealed to the Supreme Court

  4. The Supreme Court decision The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [...] The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. "The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that the United States Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right." • The Supreme Court unanimously agreed that Shenck broke the law • Justice Oliver Holmes, Jr. • Free speech does not allow you to yell fire in a theater • Does free speech allow you to yell theater in a fire hall?????

  5. Effects of the Case • Redefined the 1st amendment • In times of war and crisis, personal liberties decrease • Seen in: • The Civil War – suspension of habeas corpus • World War II – Internment Camps • Cold War – 2nd “Red Scare”

  6. Thanks for watching! • Subscribe to my channel • Help spread the word • Questions? Comments? Ideas for videos? • Leave in comments Who has the better mustache? Subscribe Down here!

More Related