130 likes | 146 Views
Learn practical techniques including with-it-ness, proximity control, and selective ignoring to manage classroom behavior efficiently. Explore Canter's Assertive Discipline Model and Hellison’s Personal and Social Responsibility Model for effective discipline systems.
E N D
chapter4 Minimizing Off-Task Behavior and Discipline Problems
Strategies for MinimizingOff-Task Behavior • Back-to-the-wall—being in position to observe the whole class • Proximity control—positioning near students who may be off task • With-it-ness • “Having eyes in the back of your head” (Kounin, 1970) • Using strategies to quickly and effectively prevent or stop off-task behavior (continued)
Strategies for MinimizingOff-Task Behavior (continued) • Selective ignoring • Monitor, not intervene • Behavior lasts a short duration or is a minor deviation, or reacting would cause interruption • Overlapping • Handling many situations simultaneously while still maintaining the flow of the lesson (continued)
Strategies for MinimizingOff-Task Behavior (continued) • Learning names • Positive pinpointing—identifying one or more children who are modeling the appropriate behavior or skill
Discipline Systems • Canter’s Assertive Discipline Model • Extrinsic motivation system • Based on specific rules with rewards and consequences • Schoolwide for greatest impact • Hellison’s Personal and Social Responsibility Model • Intrinsic motivation system • Based on helping children understand and practice getting along with others and learning how to take responsibility for their own behavior
Canter’s Assertive Discipline ModelMajor Concepts • All students can behave responsibly, and appropriate behavior is expected. • Communicate firmly but warmly and fairly with eye contact. • Clearly communicate reasonable expectations. • Reinforce appropriate behavior. • Communicate logical consequences for inappropriate behavior. • Consistently reinforce consequences for all students equally. • Mentally rehearse expectations and consequences for consistent use with students. Reprinted from A.N. Sander, 1989, “Class management skills,” Strategies 2(3): 15.
Desirable Rewards • Motivated to achieve the rewards • Less effective rewards • Popcorn or food • Free time • More effective rewards • Creative objects—“golden sneaker” • Class certificate • Stickers or stamps • Enjoyable special activity
Undesirable Consequences • Motivated to avoid the consequences • Effective consequences • Loss of time to participate in PE—time-outs for individuals or the whole class • Losing privilege to participate in enjoyable special activities
Canter’s Assertive Discipline ModelSample Consequences for Misbehavior • First offense—child is warned • Second offense—5-minute time-out • Third offense—10-minute time-out • Fourth offense—teacher calls parents • Fifth offense—meeting with parents and principal • Good behavior all week—10 minutes of free-choice time or a tangible reward
Personal Social Responsibility Model • Intrinsic motivation system developed by Don Hellison (2003) • Levels of responsibility • Level 0: Irresponsibility • Level 1: Self-control • Level 2: Involvement • Level 3: Self-responsibility • Level 4: Caring
Characteristicsof Effective Discipline Systems • Developing a clear understanding of the discipline system (rules, expectations, and consequences) at the start of the school year • Consistent enforcement by the teacher • Support from the principal, classroom teachers, and parents
Handling Discipline Confrontations • Try to not take it personally; most misbehavior is not directed at the teacher. • Deal with a child who is misbehaving in a private situation. • Ask the child what is wrong. • Calmly and quietly use the child’s name, explain the rule violation, and wait for a response. • Tell the child the consequence and expectations for future behavior. • Follow up with the child to reinforce appropriate behavior.