440 likes | 453 Views
This article explores different perspectives and indicators for measuring improvements in urban housing, including housing markets, housing preservation, resident benefits, equity and justice, and quality of life.
E N D
Refining IndicatorsFinding the Best Measures for Improvements in Urban Housing Michael Barndt Neighborhood Data Center Program Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee mbarndt@nonprofitcentermilwaukee.org Community Indicators Conference Reno, Nevada March 2004
Where I’m Coming From • Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee – Capacity building for nonprofits • Neighborhood Data Center – a clearinghouse defined by a Data/GIS Services mission • Focus on neighborhood program decision-support – work is demand driven – “retail” services • Rich data environment in Milwaukee – especially in housing • Rich technology environment – program staff of 9 • 6 are “apprentices” from local universities • Member – National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership and Making Connections Initiative
There are two kinds of people in the world • Those who think that we can all come together and find through consensus that we are all alike – that there is one common view • Those who see differences – that perhaps …. there are three kinds of people … • Academic syndrome - Closure problems • Confirmed by market driven service • Continually new, diverse requests • Well beyond a set of indicators and reports
Talking Points • Multiple contexts for viewing a subject • Indicators should not be oversimplified – their contents change as they are unbundled • Place/time/sub-communities matter • Use of data is more than creating indicators • We still are not able to measure much of what we would really like to know
Varying Perspectives • Housing Markets • Housing Preservation • Resident Benefits • Equity and Justice • Quality of Life
Varying Perspectives Housing Markets • Values increase, investment attracted, quality maintained • Home ownership, equity through appreciation • Development rewards • Strong, safe, organized neighborhoods • Attractiveness, demand, value
Varying PerspectivesHousing Preservation • Loss of housing stock may trump housing production • Housing condition enforcement • Resources to maintain and restore • Predatory behavior • Landlord behavior • Program mix appropriate to needs
Varying PerspectivesResident Benefit • Affordability – supporting access, reasonable costs for housing • Ownership as asset – wealth building • Choices for renters – ability to be effective consumers • Place/ People – Gentrification • Homeless
Varying PerspectivesEquity and Justice • Segregation • Market perception • Institutional behaviors • Access to resources • Political will to respond • Spatial isolation within region • Race, income, political jurisdiction
Varying PerspectivesQuality of Life • Much more than housing • Mobility • Unstable Transitions • “Urban Village” • Safety • “Community” • Collective local action • Economically viable • Services • Role in region
Parsing Indicators • Ownership • Value • Equity – (ownership/value) • Housing Supply • Condition • Investment • Equality
Ownership Definition and measurement • Census /city approach • Data accuracy • Homestead effects • Land contract sub-market • Rate of ownership • Capacity factor
OwnershipWho owns? • Life Cycle patterns – the Elderly • Transition of property • Late interventions • Owner – renter fault lines • Bi-modal characteristics – income, race, mobility, children, participation, multiple problems • Persistence of renters • Policy biases toward ownership • Investor owners// slum lords • Patterns/ Practice
“Ownership”Getting at the large term • Responsibilities of ownership • Investment • Order • Neighborhood upkeep • Organizations – Block clubs
ValueTracking Sales data • Sales • Limited numbers of transactions • Affected by type • Affected by circumstance – arms length • Sales perspectives • Volume • Value/ changing value • Within a market
ValueTracking Assessment • Model • Quality • “Comparable” Zones • Amenity effects • Implementation • Effect of volume of information • Data limitations – quality/ condition • Pace – sensitivity choices • Administrative effects
ValueUnbundling the Indicator • Differential markets – duplexes • Shifting housing stock base • Consider a resident owner perspective • Flipping – distortions in market information
ValueEffects of perception • Changing expectations • Speculation effects • Investment/ commodity • Effects on investment/ maintenance decisions by owners • Effects on lending decisions
EquityOwnership as Wealth Building • Common assumption • Equity deteriation • Use of equity loans • Effects of predatory lending • Value of “bootstrap” programs • Difficulties measuring resident experience • Wealth other than income • Debt and factors affecting debt • Credit worthiness – Access to primary financial systems
Housing SupplyVacancy • Hard to measure vacant units • Especially those ready for occupancy • Some units taken off market – duplexes • Vacant land • Understated • Government ownership
Housing supplyInterpretation • “Abandonment” as a stage • Threshold for investment decisions • Triage has come to mean public abandonment of certain neighborhoods • Relationship to population change • Did public leave first? • Or did housing condition/options drive them out • Regional growth often reinvents neighborhoods beyond basic needs for supply
Housing supplyUse • Residents like vacant lots • Are lots effective open space? • Are lots used for other purposes? • Gardens • Tot lots • Are lots appropriate for redevelopment? • Assembly issues • Land-banking as a policy • Holding action • Obsolete footprints • Bias against “infill”
InvestmentHMDA • Investment patterns • Lending packages for slumlords • Sub-prime lending • Predatory lending
InvestmentForeclosure • Tax foreclosure • Mortgage foreclosure • Patterns of concentration • A subset - elderly • Resident owner/ Investor owner • Recent policy effects • Patterns of return of property to the market
Investment Maintenance/ Improvements • Costs to maintain • The back side to “bootstrap” options • Lending limits when costs exceed value • Costs do not vary by geography • Incentives • Disincentives • Effects of lax enforcement
InvestmentPrograms • Mix of options and resources • Running out of funds • How well are options marketed • Is there capacity to implement • Especially local • Who does not fit the options?
InvestmentAccess to capital • Affordability • Work-income comes first • Costs of new investments • Public Policy • Public policy stresses increasing middle income participation/ or removing lower income concentrations • Failure of “trickle-down” • Tax structure – subsidizing wealth • Costs • Increasing burden - % of income spent on housing • Risks associated with bootstrap approaches
EqualityDiscrimination by race • HMDA lending / refusal patterns • Importance of testing • Debate over measures of segregation • Extent of transitory “integrated” neighborhoods • Extent of “unstable” “integrated” neighborhoods
EqualityDiscrimination against persons • Who cares about low income housing supply • Renter programs • Homeless programs • Employment – wages/ stability • Low income solutions in the past • Public housing ghettos • Weeding out • Felons • Transitional services • Homeless – linking to the full cycle
EqualityLending practices • From “trust” • Racial effects • Community connections – local lending • To formulas • What is the bias in these?
EqualityDiscrimination against place • Redlining • Regional equity • Taxing resources • Schools • Public policy • Local capacity • For self help • For locally driven development • Public/ nonprofit partnerships
EqualityRedefining place • Destroy a village to save it • Eliminate old housing stock • Recreate a community, but for different people • Gentrification