330 likes | 431 Views
Waterway access Planning in a rural coastal Community. . A collaborative effort to promote Economic development. Florida’s Rural Counties. 32 of Florida’s 67 Counties have a population of less than 75,000 Almost all are designated as Rural Area’s of Critical Economic Concern
E N D
Waterway access Planning in a rural coastal Community . A collaborative effort to promote Economic development
Florida’s Rural Counties • 32 of Florida’s 67 Counties have a population of less than 75,000 • Almost all are designated as Rural Area’s of Critical Economic Concern • While rich in natural resources - economies are extremely fragile
Florida 2060 • 2005 – 1000 Friends of Florida Study • Statewide Population Distribution Scenario • Estimated Population using BEBR Moderate Projection for 2005-2030 • Trend Line Extended to 2060
Florida Population 2005 • The 2005 BEBR study showed that Taylor County like the majority of Florida Counties are largely undeveloped.
Florida Population 2060 • Based upon historical growth trends the study projects that Taylor County’s population will remain virtually unchanged in 2060.
Taylor County Vision 2060 • The 1000 Friends of Florida Study confirmed that without an investment desired quality of life changes would not occur • The 2060 Study – Prompted Taylor County to create it own Vision for 2060
Vision 2060 – Waterway Access • Identified our local rivers and the Gulf as being critical natural resources for preserving and enhancing our quality of life. • Confirmed the frustration of having one of the longest coastlines in the state with extremely limited access to the Gulf. • Identified that enhanced waterway access was critical to attracting tourist, residential and commercial growth.
Taylor County’s - Coastline • Approximately 80% is owned and controlled by the State and the Federal Government • Coastal Management Area • Very Limited access • Scheduled to remain in conservation for perpetuity
Coastal Resources • Big Bend Seagrass Aquatic Preserve -Seagrass Beds • Contiguous • Patchy • Boat Ramps • 14 public boat ramp facilities with access to the Gulf of Mexico but limited access to roads that lead to ramps and most ramps substandard. • Only one deep water access ramp in 2005 • Keaton Beach
Need for Empirical Research • Funding a critical issue • Need for understanding of • What we had • What was needed • What were our options • Etc. • Identified the need for 3rd party unbiased, empirical research to provident insight and help provide creditability to our residents, legislators and funding agencies. • Critical for future planning and allocation of resources
Collaboration with FSG • 2008 - We were starting to look for partnerships with state institutions. • June 2008 – We were approach by Dr. Charles Sidman to see if we were interested in collaborating with FSG and IFAS. • The collaboration between FSG/IFAS and Taylor County worked extremely well • FSG worked within the scope of their mission to meet our specific needs.
Why FSG Collaborated • National concern. Not unique to Florida. • In Florida, the need to improve access is well established by local and state authorities. • “Wildlife 2060: What’s at Stake for Florida” forecasts continuing decline in coastal waterway access (FWC, 2008). • “Boating Access Facilities Inventory and Economic Study” acknowledges “rapid rate of land-use change along Florida’s coastal and inland waterways” which exacerbates access issues (FWC, 2009). • Involving residents and users can align facility improvements with community interests.
Why FSG Collaborated • FSG Identified Taylor County as a good candidate to help support our efforts and their efforts to improve public waterway access. • Taylor County Shared similarities with other rural and developed areas. • History of declining access to waterfronts • Limited deep water access and parking • Crowding and congestion at popular ramps • Supported Taylor County Vision 2060 Plan. • Builds upon work conducted by the Taylor County Coastal Committee.
Why FSG Collaborated • Consistent with FSG’s planning priority to support comprehensive planning for coastal and marine resources (FSG Strategic Plan 2009) • Support of planning initiatives in rural Florida Coastal Communities consistent with FSG’s Federal mandate to: • Promote hazard resiliency • Support healthy ecosystems • Sustain coastal economies
FSG/IFAS/Taylor CountyPlanning Waterway Access • Charles Sidman, Florida Sea Grant • Garin Davidson, Florida Sea Grant • Robert Swett, Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences • Alan Hodges, Food and Resource Economics • Tim Fik, Geography • Fred Vose, Taylor County, UF/IFAS • Clay Olson, Taylor County, UF/IFAS Dir. • Jack Brown, Taylor County Administrator
Goals and Objectives • Goal • Provide science-based information to support Taylor County waterway access planning efforts. • Objectives • Determine if demand exceeds facility capacity. • Gauge public support for facility improvements. • Identify access amenities favored by residents/users. • Identify locations where improvements are desired. • Estimate economic benefits from access facilities.
Study Elements • Resident Survey • 2000 residents selected from property tax rolls. • 663 surveys returned (33.6% return rate). • Ramp Survey • Ramps visited for 1 year. • Tag information collected. • Parking capacity estimated. • Boater Survey • Questionnaires distributed to 1,644 boaters at boat ramps . • 209 surveys returned (12.7% return rate).
Resident & Boater Surveys • Map-based survey allowed recipients to identify where improvements should be made. • Allowed recipients to quickly cross-reference coastal and waterway access locations with specific questions.
Does Demand Exceed Facility Capacity? • Estimated number of trips per year: 28,153 • Most ramps have adequate parking (operate at between 36% and 74% of parking capacity). • Demand exceeds parking at popular ramps during peak use periods (e.g., Steinhatchee, Keaton Beach).
Does the Public Support Improvements? • A clear majority of residents (users & non-users) and boaters (motorized & non-motorized) support improvements to public boat ramp facilities.
What is the Economic Impact of Providing Public Access? • 84% of visitor trip-related expenditures made “in- county.” • Regional economic model for Taylor County developed using IMPLAN modeling software.
Outcomes • Supported a successful request by the County for $600K toward the development of a new $3,000,000 boat ramp in Steinhatchee. • Supported a request for a $100K state grant to expand parking at Keaton Beach Ramp. • Road map for prioritizing future improvements.
What is the Observed Use of theSteinhatchee Ramp? • Annual permit decal sales doubled in 2011 compared to three year average (2008-2010) • Data for just 18 days (July-September) averaged 65 trips/day (7AM-2PM) w/$289,351 Expended Total trips (18 days) Resident (14%) Day Visitors (44%) Overnight Visitors (42%) 1,165 $35,318 $71,747 $182,286
Keaton Beach Boat Ramp - Coastal Park Project Project Focus Area FY 2010-2011 And 2011-2012
Thank You! Report now available. • Hard copy • PDF on FSG website (flseagrant.org) Jack R. Brown, Taylor County County Administrator (850) 838-3500, Ext. 7 Jack.Brown@taylorcountygov.com