530 likes | 1.46k Views
Affinity Measurement with B iomolecular I nteraction A nalysis Bia core. Kinetics. Affinity. Thermodynamics. What SPR Biosensors Measures. Concentration. Specificity. How fast, strong & why… Is the binding of a lead compound. How specific & selective...
E N D
Affinity Measurement withBiomolecular Interaction AnalysisBiacore
Kinetics Affinity Thermodynamics What SPR Biosensors Measures Concentration Specificity How fast, strong & why… Is the binding of a lead compound How specific & selective... Is this drug binding to its receptor? How much... Biologically active compound is in a production batch?
Biacore History • Founded 1984 as Pharmacia Biosensor AB • Biacore System launched October 1990 • Biacore Symposium 1991 • Inline referencing started 1994 • Became Biacore AB in 1996 • Support of regulated environments from 2002 • Entering the drug discovery market with S51 in 2002 • Going into protein arrays with Biacore A100 and Flexchip in 2005
SPR Detection Sensor Chips IFC Microfluidic The Corner-stones of the Technology
Total Internal Reflection & SPR • Gold layer • Evanescent field • Total Internal Reflected light (TIR) • TIR angle • Incident Light • High refractive index medium: Prism • Low refractive index medium: Buffer
Principle SPR detects refractive index changes close to the surface E.g. accumulation of 1 pg/mm2 gives a change of 1 µRIU or 1 RU All biomolecules have refractive properties, so no labeling required Result No need to separate bound from free This facilitates real-time measurements as a basis for taking kinetic data Work with un-altered analytes possible SPR detection
Sensor Chips Sensor Chip specific matrix Glass Gold 50 nm
Sensor Chip CM5 • Dextran matrix covered with carboxyl groupes (red circles) • Captures ligands such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids(irreversible) • Study of analytes ranging in size from small organic molecules, e.g. drug candidates, to large molecular assemblies or whole viruses.
Sensor Chip CM4 • Similar to CM5 but with a lower degree of carboxymethylation resulting in low immobilization capacity and lower surface charge density. • Allows to reduce non specific binding in case of complex mixture such as cell extract or culture medium. • Advantageous for kinetic experiments where low immobilization levels are recommended.
Sensor Chip CM3 • Similar to CM5 but with shorter dextran chains, giving a lower immobilization capacity of the surface. • Allows the interaction to take place closer to the cell surface which can improve sensitivity when working with large molecules, molecular complexes, viruses or whole cells.
Sensor Chip SA • CM dextran matrix pre-immobilized with streptavidin • Captures biotinylated ligands such as carbohydrates, peptides, proteins and DNA (irreversible) • Ideal for capture of large biotinylated DNA fragments and study of nucleic acid interactions
Sensor Chip NTA • CM dextran matrix pre-immobilized with nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) • Capture of His-tagged ligands via metal chelation • Controled steric orientation of ligand for optimal site exposure • Regeneration by injection of EDTA to remove metal ions
Sensor Chip L1 • CM dextran matrix modified with lipophilic anchor molecules • For rapid and reproducible capture of lipid membrane vesicles such as liposomes,with retention of lipid bilayer structure • Allows studies of transmembrane receptors in a membrane-like environment , for example.
The Steps in the Biacore Assay Surface preparation Analysis Cycle
a n a l y t e l i g a n d a n a l y t e l i g a n d c a p t u r i n g m o l e c u l e Surface Preparation: Immobilization Direct Capture
Amine Coupling - Sensorgram • Activation = EDC/NHS injection surface esters • Ligand contact = reaction with amine groups on ligand • Blocking = deactivation of free esters with ethanolamine Blocking Activation Ligand contact
Analysis Cycle Generates the desired data Sample injection Regeneration Evaluation
Analysis Cycle • Done by • Buffer flow, pH shift, salt & chaotrophic ions, detergents • Similar concept as in affinity chromatography • Results • Re-use of biospecific surface • Low amount of ligand needed Sample injection Regeneration Evaluation
Experiments without Kinetics Specificity Multi layer structure Concentration assays Affinity constants
Specificity • Do two molecules interact with each other? Yes/No Answers. • Different analytes are tested with the same ligand e.g. different lectins with immobilized thyroglobulin. • Quantitative measurements, test a range of analyte concentration to determine the concentration dependency of the response.
Specificity Analysis Overplay plot of sensorgrams showing interaction between different lectins and immobilized thyroglobulin.
Multiple Binding • Enhancement • Enhancing lower detection limit of assays • Sandwich assays • Enhancing selectivity of test • Epitope mapping • Charting the surface of antigens with antibodies • Multimolecular complexes • Identify the logical sequence of binding events
Analyte Ligand 2nd Binder 31000 30000 29000 28000 27000 26000 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Multiple Binding Response [RU] Time [s]
Epitope Specificity of two mAbs against HIV1-p24 Immobilization of rabbit rabbit anti-mouse IgG1 • A: baseline • A-B: 1st mAb against HIV1-p24 • B-C: blocking antibody • C-D: HIV1-p24 • D-E: 2nd mAb against HIV1-p24
Concentration Assays • Concentration based on biological activity • All concentration assays require a calibration curve • Concentrations of unknowns samples are calculated from this • 4 - 7 concentrations in duplicate • Calibrants and unknowns in same matrix • Moderate to high densities on sensor chip • Direct binding formats • Inhibition formats
Sample Calibration Curves Response x x x x x Concentration = Sample matrix for calibration curve Sample matrix for unknown samples
Affinity Analysis • How STRONG is the binding at equilibrium? • » Quantify KD • » Rank Antibodies • » Find best Ab pairs
Signal [RU] 20 15 10 5 0 Time [s] 60 120 0 Affinity and Equilibrium • Furosemide binding to carbonic anhydrase • Referenced data • Report Point towards end of injection • Do secondary plot
Determining Affinity Constants • Plot Req against C • Steady state model • Concentration at 50% saturation is KD
How FAST is the binding ?» ka kon (recognition)» kd koff (stability)» KD = kd/ka» Ab selection; wash steps Kinetic Analysis
All target sites occupied 1 µM 100 nM 30 min 60 min 30 min 60 min Same Affinity but different Kinetics • All four compounds have the same affinity KD = 10 nM = 10-8M • The same affinity can be the result from different kinetics ka [M-1s-1] kd [s-1] 106 10-2 105 10-3 104 10-4 103 10-5 KD 10 nM
kd (A).(B) = ka (AB) Equilibrium Constants ka (AB) = kd (A).(B)
dR = ka. C . (Rmax-R) – kd . R dt Extracting Rate Constants from Sensograms • Measure binding curves • Decide on a model to describe the interaction • Fit the curve to a mathematical rate equation describing the model • e.g. • Obtain values for the constants ka, kd, Rmax • Assess the fit • overlay pots, residual plots • acceptable statistics e.g. chi2 – curve fidelity • Biological and experimental relevance of the calculated parameters
Biacore and other Methods Conventional Biacore Assays Time Method Time One Day ELISA Day 1 Isotyping RIA Weeks + labelling Affinity Day 1&2 Na Na Kinetics Day 1&2 Weeks + labelling ELISA Overnight Epitope Map Biacore is much quicker than conventional methods
Summary Surface plasmon resonance detects binding events as changes in mass at the chip surface Real-time kinetic measurements Qualitative rankings Measurement of concentrations Information about structure-activity relationships No labeling and low volumes samples needed