1 / 28

Date: 2011-11-10

TGad November 2011 Report. Date: 2011-11-10. Authors:. Meeting Protocol. Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot. Attendance. https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat/attendance/index Register Indicate attendance

yen
Download Presentation

Date: 2011-11-10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGad November 2011 Report Date:2011-11-10 Authors: Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  2. Meeting Protocol • Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  3. Attendance • https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat/attendance/index • Register • Indicate attendance See document 11-09-0517r0 for more details Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  4. Attendance, Voting & Document Status • Make sure your badges are correct • If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising • Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area • see Adrian Stephens – adrian.p.stephens@intel.com • Cell Phones Silent or Off Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  5. Patent Policy • Following 5 slides Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  6. Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: • Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation • Advise the WG attendees that: • The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; • Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; • There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. • Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: • That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; • That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard • Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. • The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. • It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. (Optional to be shown) Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  7. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform • All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents orpatent claims • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patentclaim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group • Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  8. Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Slide #2 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  9. Call for Potentially Essential Patents • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: • Either speak up now or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or • Cause an LOA to be submitted Slide #3 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  10. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. • --------------------------------------------------------------- • See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  11. Agenda Items for the Week • Call for secretary • Set agenda for the week • Review from September • Approve minutes from September • Review conference calls • Editor Report • Comment resolution on D5.0 & motions on resolutions • Plan for Sponsor Ballot • Motion for Recirculation Letter Ballot • Planning for January • Proposal for working relationship with CWPAN • Other presentations Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  12. Submissions • Comment Resolution • 11/1374r2, Comment Database, Carlos Cordeiro • Other • 11/1447r0, P802.11ad Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot, Eldad Perahia • Proposal for working relationship with CWPAN, Bruce Kraemer Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  13. Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week • Monday Nov 7th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Call for secretary • Set agenda for the week • Review from September • Approve minutes from September • Review conference calls • Editor Report • Comment resolution on D5.0 & motions on resolutions • Motion for Recirculation Letter Ballot • Plan for Sponsor Ballot • Planning for January • Tuesday Nov 8th, 8:00 – 10:00 • cancel • Wednesday Nov 9th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Proposal for working relationship with CWPAN, Bruce Kraemer • Thursday Nov 10th, 8:00 – 10:00 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  14. Agenda for Monday Nov 7th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Call for secretary • Set agenda for the week • Review from September • Approve minutes from September • Review conference calls • Editor Report • Comment resolution on D5.0 & motions on resolutions • Motion for Recirculation Letter Ballot • Plan for Sponsor Ballot • Planning for January Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  15. Notes for Monday Nov 7th, 16:00 – 18:00 • September minutes approved • Comment resolutions approved • Motion for recirculation passes • Sponsor ballot report • Need to fix link • Need to fix header • Motion approved • Tues 8-10am cancelled Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  16. Review from September • Resolved all comments on LB 183 • TG and WG approved motion for recirculation letter ballot on D5.0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  17. September Minutes • Motion to approve September ‘11 TGad minutes as contained in 11-11-1220r0 • Move: Chris • Second: James • Approved by unanimous concent Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  18. Review of Conference Calls • Conference call minutes from 2011 contained in • 11/0016r23 • Comment resolution on D5.0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  19. Editor Report • LB185 comment database: 11/1374r2 • Total technical comments: 27 • Total editorial comments: 14 • All comments reviewed in conference calls • All comments rejected • No changes to the draft • All comments included in Motions 63, 64 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  20. Timeline for Conditional Approval • D3 (completed) • Approval of comment resolutions: July 22 • D4 (completed) • Prepare draft: July 29 (completed) • Recirculation Letter Ballot: Aug 1 – Aug 15 (completed) • Comment resolution: Aug 16 – Sept 23 • Approval of comment resolutions: Sept 23 • D5 (in progress) • Prepare draft: Sept 20 • Recirculation Letter Ballot: Sept 21 – Oct 6 (completed) • Comment resolution: Oct 7 – Nov 9 (completed) • Approval of comment resolutions: Nov 9 (completed) • D5 unchanged • Recirculation Letter Ballot: Nov 9 – Nov 24 • Comment resolution (accelerated process): Nov 25 – Dec 6 • Prepare for Sponsor Ballot • 802.11 MEC: completed • IEEE-SA MEC: completed • Form Sponsor ballot pool: Sept 24 – Nov 11 (in progress) • Prepare report for Conditional: Nov 9 – 11 (in progress) • Seek Conditional Approval: Nov 11 • Prepare report to EC: Dec 7 – 9 • EC response to report: Dec 11 - 16 • Start of Initial Sponsor Ballot: Dec 19 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  21. Motion 63 • Move to approve resolution of comments: • 5013, 5037, 5006, 5015, 5038, 5009, 5018, 5020, 5023, 5022, 5024 in 11/1374r2 • No objection to resolutions during Thursday October 13th, 10:00-12:00 ET conference call • Move/Second: James/Chris • Motion passes: Y/N/A: 23/4/0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  22. Motion 64 • Move to approve resolution of comments: • 5025, 5010, 5039, 5027, 5028, 5026, 5005, 5002, 5012, 5031, 5033, 5008, 5034, 5035, 5036, 5040, 5014, 5001, 5000, 5016, 5017, 5019, 5021, 5003, 5030, 5029, 5011, 5007, 5032, 5004 in 11/1374r2 • No objection to resolutions during Thursday October 20th, 20:00-22:00 ET conference call • Move/Second: James/Chris • Motion passes: Y/N/A: 22/4/1 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  23. Motion for Recirculation Letter Ballot • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB 185 on P802.11ad D5.0 as contained in document 11/1374r2, • Approve a 10 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11ad D5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” • Moved: Chris Hansen , Seconded: James Yee, Result: • [Moved by Eldad Perahia on behalf of TGad • TGad vote: • Moved: Chris Hansen, Seconded: James Yee, Result: 23-0-4] Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  24. Motion on Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot • Move to approve the Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot in 11/1447r0 • Moved: Chris Hansen, Seconded: James Yee • Motion passes: Result: 20-0-0 Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  25. Goals for January • Comment resolution on initial Sponsor Ballot Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  26. Conference call times • Previously approved conference calls • Oct 27, Nov 17, Dec 8 • 10:00 – 12:00 ET • Oct 20, Nov 3, Dec 1, Dec 15 • 20:00-22:00 ET • New conference calls • Not overlap with TGac • Dec 22, Jan 5, Jan 26, Feb 9 • 10:00 – 12:00 ET • Dec 29, Jan 12, Feb 2, Feb 16 • 20:00-22:00 ET Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  27. Agenda for Wednesday Nov 9th, 16:00 – 18:00 • Proposal for working relationship with CWPAN, Bruce Kraemer, 11/1570 • Architecture Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

  28. Notes for Wednesday Nov 9th, 16:00 – 18:00 • CWPAN • Strawpoll: Do you support the formation of a study group to establish a forum for developing the procedural framework, clarifying the technical goals and developing a PAR and 5C documents focused on CWPAN extensions to 11ad ? • yes/no/abs: 31/0/2 • Architecture • Provide information for 802.1 • Start with “white paper” for additional explanation on how multi-MAC in multi-bands fits into 802.11 reference models and how it extends 802.1 architecture Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

More Related