1 / 13

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Steven H. Berliner, M.D. Section on Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. No Financial Disclosures or Conflicts of Interest. In 1985, a prestigious medical center listed the following course in its conference brochure:

yen
Download Presentation

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Steven H. Berliner, M.D. Section on Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

  2. No Financial Disclosures or Conflicts of Interest

  3. In 1985, a prestigious medical center listed the following course in its conference brochure: “Hysteroscopy – in search of an indication”

  4. “Robotic Sacrocolpopexy – in search of an indication”

  5. Indications for Sacrocolpopexy in Patients with Apical Support Defects • Ideal in patients who are sexually active • Poor tissue quality (age, hypoestrogenic) • Shortened vaginal lengths/calibers • Prior MMK/Burch procedures • Previous failed repairs

  6. Contradictions • Active divertricular disease • Inflammatory bowel disease • Bleeding disorders (relative)

  7. Concerns • Cautious with patients who have had failed mesh procedures (anterior +/- posterior compartments) – overmeshed • Prior mesh infections – need to understand why? • High responders • Technique • Patients with prior repairs +/- mesh kits with vaginal pain/dyspareunia associated with stiffened anterior/posterior compartments – may worsen situation • May not correct level III defects – eversion of lower vagina

  8. Challenges in Performing Sacrocolpopexy - Open - Laparoscopic - Robotic • Elevated BMI • Variability of aortic/vena cava bifurcation • Elderly patients (degenerative vertebrae changes) – causes narrowing of bifurcation and bifurcation extending to L5-S1. Minimal space to attach graft to anterior vertebrae ligament • Prior pelvic/abdominal surgery • Bleeding, graft erosion, infection, rejection, sacral osteomyelitis, mesh shrinkage – back pain/vaginal pain

  9. Why Do Robotic Sacrocolpopexy? • Filters and translates hand movements into more precise movements of the endowrist movements • Target anatomy visualized at higher magnification (3-D) • Ergonomically superior • Ideal in areas (posterior vaginal wall-rectovaginal space) involving complex reconstruction and tight spaces • Small incisions, decreased operative pain, shorter hospital stays and return to activities faster

  10. Skill Sets for Doing Robotic Sacrocolpopexy • Reliance and experience from open/laparoscopic cases – haptics • Procedures typically take longer • Volume, volume, volume • Techniques – variability – surgical skill

  11. Not Everything Is for Everybody • Do what you know and are comfortable with • Follow your patients – over years • Learn from mistakes/errors • Diagnosis prior to going to the O.R. is key to a good repair • Sometimes lesser is better

More Related