100 likes | 201 Views
2a. Introduction of ad hoc Technical Advisory Panels for PC13 R-PPs. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. Thirteenth Meeting of the Participants Committee (PC13) Brazzaville, Republic of Congo October 21-22, 2012. Overview of six R-PP submissions to FCPF. Reviewed six countries –
E N D
2a. Introduction of ad hoc Technical Advisory Panels for PC13 R-PPs Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Thirteenth Meeting of the Participants Committee (PC13) Brazzaville, Republic of Congo October 21-22, 2012
Overview of six R-PP submissions to FCPF • Reviewed six countries – • 3 from Latin America, 1 from West Africa and 2 from South East Asia • Wide range of • Country populations – 0.20 million in Vanuatu to 20 million in Cameroon • Rural areas – 13% in Chile to 87% in Papua New Guinea (PNG)
Overview of six R-PP submissions to FCPF Forest areas – 22% in Chile to 63% in PNG Annual deforestation varies from virtually none in Chile, Vanuatu and Cameroon to between 1 and 4% in El Salvador, PNG and Honduras
Review Process • Continuing the established procedure: • Countries submit R-PP to FCPF/FMT • TAP country review teams are established • 5 to 8 individual experts nominated & included on FCPF Roster of Experts. Cross-disciplinary & regional expertise: forest policy, MRV • 2-3 in-country experts, including indigenous peoples expert • Groups of PC members are also organized
TAP and PC Review Methods • TAP Review: • Individual reviews, using standard review template and guidelines for both TAP and PC reviewers. • Conference calls among TAP members • Lead reviewers are nominated • Lead reviewers produce single synthesis reviews, which are shared with the countries. • TAP conference call with country on TAP draft review synthesis • Country revises R-PP, showing changes made • Final TAP country review synthesis, and final R-PPs posted on FCPF web
TAP process remains labor-intensive, but valuable For PC 13 • 6 country R-PPs reviewed • 5 to 8 TAP reviews per country = 36 reviews: • 20 from REDD country experts • FMT hired about 30 TAP experts in July-August for PC 13 and PC14 • TAP held about 12 conference calls • Be objective, consistent and fair. • Provide constructive recommendations for enhancement of R-PPs by the country, and expert advice on REDD. • Serve in individual capacity, not representing an organization. • Our thanks to the TAP members. Charge to the TAP Members
TAP review leaders at this meeting • Stephen Cobb (co-lead, Cameroon, PNG, Vanuatu R-PPs) • Conservation and development consultant (UK) • JayantSathaye (co-lead, PNG and Vanuatu R-PPs) • Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (US and India) • Ken Creighton (co-lead, Cameroon R-PP) • USAID Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE) • Gisela Ulloa (co-lead, El Salvador, Chile and Honduras R-PPs) • Independent forest policy consultant (Bolivia)
PC Review of R-PPs • FMT has revised schedule since PC10, so PC only reviews the revised R-PP after TAP comments have been addressed. • For PC13 R-PPs, 12 PC members reviewed 5 Country R-PPs (except Vanuatu, which is not going to be presented in PC13): • 2 to 5 reviewers per R-PP • 1 to 3 R-PPs per member • Many thanks to PC reviewers and lead reviewers: CAR, Colombia (Lead), Indonesia, RoC (Lead), AFD, Australia, Canada, EU, Germany (Lead), Japan (Lead), Switzerland, and USA (Lead)
Schedule for R-PP Submission (tentative) • FMT Strongly urges countries yet to submit R-PPs to use R-PP Template version 6 (April 20, 2012). The Template and Annexes in English, French and Spanish are available on FCPF website.
Merci Thank you Gracias www.forestcarbonpartnership.org