1 / 25

TDR Plans and Scope

TDR Plans and Scope. Nick Walker Marc Ross Akira Yamamoto GDE PAC 15.11.11 Prague . GDE Stated Prime Deliverables. An updated technical description of the ILC in sufficient detail to justify the associated VALUE estimate

yitta
Download Presentation

TDR Plans and Scope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TDR Plans and Scope Nick Walker Marc Ross Akira Yamamoto GDE PAC 15.11.11 Prague

  2. GDE Stated Prime Deliverables • An updated technical description of the ILC in sufficient detail to justify the associated VALUE estimate • Results from critical R&D programmes and test facilities, which either demonstrate or support the choice of key parameters in the machine design • One or more models for a Project Implementation Plan, including scenarios for globally distributed mass-production of high-technology components as “in-kind” contributions • An updated and robust VALUE estimate and construction schedule consistent with the scope of the machine and the proposed Project Implementation Plan Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  3. Technical Volumes 2007 2011 2013* ~250 pagesDeliverable 2 TDR Part I: R&D ~300 pagesDeliverables 1,3 and 4 TDR Part II:BaselineReferenceReport AD&I ILC Technical Progress Report (“interim report”) Technical Design Report Reference Design Report * end of 2012 – formal publication early 2013 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  4. Part I: Tech. Design Phase R&D • Comprehensive report on TDP R&D programmes • where and how we spent the money • Similar in scope to R&D sections in interim report • more technically detailed • more conclusive • Report R&D results should support baseline (decisions) in Part II • But scope can be broader, i.e. R&D on alternative concepts Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  5. Part I: R&D - Outline • Introduction 5 pages • Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages • Beam Test Facilities 75 pages • Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages • Post-TDR R&D 20 pages • Conclusions 10 pages Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  6. Part I: R&D - Outline • Introduction 5 pages • Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages • Beam Test Facilities 75 pages • Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages • Post-TDR R&D 10 pages • Conclusions 10 pages 2.1 Overview 2.2 Gradient R&D and yield evaluation 2.3 Cavity integration and S1-Global cryomodule R&D 2.4 Cryomodule, cryogenics (incl. S1-Gobal) 2.5 High power RF generation and distribution 2.6 ML integration including quadrupole R&D 2.7 Industrialisation technology and R&D Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  7. Part I: R&D - Outline • Introduction 5 pages • Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages • Beam Test Facilities 75 pages • Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages • Post-TDR R&D 10 pages • Conclusions 10 pages 3.1 Overview 3.2 FLASH 9mA experiment 3.3 CesrTA and electron cloud R&D 3.4 ATF2 Final Focus experiment Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  8. Part I: R&D - Outline • Introduction 5 pages • Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages • Beam Test Facilities75 pages • Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages • Post-TDR R&D 10 pages • Conclusions 10 pages 4.1 Overview 4.2 Electron source 4.3 Positron source 4.4 Damping ring 4.5 BDS & MDI 4.6 Beam dynamics Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  9. Part I: R&D - Outline • Introduction 5 pages • Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages • Beam Test Facilities75 pages • Accelerator Systems R&D50 pages • Post-TDR R&D20 pages • Conclusions 10 pages • (Under discussion) • Pushing cavity performance (G, Q0) – TeV upgrade • SCRF beam test facilities • NML@FNAL, STF@KEK, FLASH@DESY • RF power source and distribution R&D • ATF2 (KEK) • Positron source etc. Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  10. Part II: ILC Baseline Design Report • Relatively detailed description of the updated baseline design • on which the cost estimate is based • Similar level of detail to RDR • But different structure – see later • Supporting R&D results to be referenced to Part I. • Design details reference to Technical Design Documentation (TDD) in ILC-EDMS • electronic version to contain hyperlinks • see later Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  11. Part II: ILC Baseline Design Report • Introduction and overview 5 pages • General parameters and layout 15 pages • SCRF Main Linacs 40 pages • Polarised electron source 15 pages • Positron source 20 pages • Damping Rings 30 pages • Ring to Main Linac (RTML) 20 pages • Beam Delivery System & MDI 30 pages • CFS and global systems 30 pages • .. see later Detailed section outline available here Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  12. RDR vs TDR Part II • RDR was divided into • Accelerator Systems (sources, DR, BDS etc.) • Technical Groups (cryomodule, RF, magnets vacuum etc.) • TDR Part II is Accelerator System orientated • Each sub-system will cover its own technical systems • Better suited to TD Phase project structure • Acknowledge lack of RDR-like tech. groups Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  13. Part II Example Chapter 6 Damping Rings 6.1 Top-level DR layout and parameters 6.2 Lattice description 6.3 Beam dynamics (e-cloud, FII and classical instabilities, LET) 6.4 Vacuum system design (including e-cloud mitigation, impedance etc) 6.6 Magnets and power supplies 6.7 Instrumentation and feedback systems Technical systems Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  14. Special Cases: SCRF 3 SCRF Main Linacs 3.1 Main linac layout and parameters 3.2 Cavity performance and production specification 3.3 Cavity integration (coupler, tuners,…) 3.4 Cryomodule design (including quad package) 3.5 Cryogenics 3.6 RF power and distribution systems KCS DRFS RDR solution (back-up) 3.7 Low-level RF control Description of regional baseline variants Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  15. Special Cases: CFS 9 CFS 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Asian Region Siting Studies 9.3 European Region Siting Studies 9.4 Asian Region Civil Design 9.5 Americas Region Civil Design 9.6 European Region Civil Design 9.7 Mechanical Design 9.8 Electrical Design No Americas siting study Civil construction design now reflects regional design differences Common mechanical and electrical design concepts Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  16. Part II: ILC Baseline Design Report • TeV Energy and Luminosity 20 pages Upgrade • integration of planned white paper • Cost and Schedule 20 pages • Project Implementation Planning >20 pages • integration of stand-alone report (57 pages) • see presentation by E. Paterson • Post-TDR Engineering 20 pages • including technical risk assessment • Conclusions 10 pages Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  17. Technical Editorial Board Hayano (KEK) Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  18. EDMS and Tech. Design Documentation Important goal to consolidate all technical documentation in EDMS in a structured fashion Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  19. Web-based access to ILC WBS • http://www.linearcollider.org/GDE/technical-design-documentation • Read-only access • for convenience only • Direct use of EDMS still required for • documentation update, sign-off, release • change control • ILC-EDMS group populating EDMS WBS • as part of on-going baseline review process • Mandatory documents required • parameters • system description / interfaces • treaty points • etc. • … Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  20. More Publications ~250 pages TDR Part I: R&D • Executive summary • lighter weight, easier to read • possibly joint summary with Physics & Detector publications • similar to RDR TDR Part II:BaselineReferenceReport ~300 pages ~50 pages pages Executive Summary • Outreach document • ILC Communicator project • Aimed at broader readership • non-scientific • Example: ILC Passport ~25 pages pages Outreach Document Technical Design Report Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  21. Coordination with Physics & Detectors TDR Part I: R&D TDR Part II:BaselineReferenceReport • Time scale and scope • important to publish all documents as a set • as for RDR • Look and feel • Same templates and layout themes should be used • Technical consistency • Obvious • Especially important for MDI • Possible joint documents • Joint Executive Summary • Outreach document • Primary coordination via respective TEBs • just starting Physics DBD Report Executive Summary Outreach Document Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  22. Tentative Schedule 2011 2012 Korea GDE meeting 24.04 – Parts I & II first drafts 16 weeks 25 weeks Executive Summary Companion outreach document US LC meeting (Arlington)24.10 – final Drafts preparation • Very aggressive schedule! • In parallel: • cost estimation • TDD for EDMS We like a challenge  Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  23. Meeting Cycles (WebEx) • Established schedule: every Wednesday • New four week cycle: • AD&I meeting • SCRF Technology • AD&I meeting • Free slot • Additional Friday slot also available Consolidated Accelerator Systems and CFS/Global meetings (now focused on TDR work) To be used for TDR TEB and Cost Management Team meetings Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  24. 2011 Preparation Work • TEB kick-off meeting • editing assignments and agreed-upon workflow • Finalise detailed outline • headings • estimated page count • section scope • authors • Request feedback from authors • especially for schedule • Note: many authors have more than one writing assignment • Consolidate/adjust writing schedule • Technical preparation • Common workspace • LaTeX template(s) • … Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

  25. Summary • Preparation for TDR well underway • Now primary GDE focus (together with costing/industrialisation) • 2+1 separate volumes • Executive Summary • Part I R&D • Part II Baseline Design & Cost • Accompanying outreach document • broader non-scientific readership • Preparation work remainder of this year, writing starts next year • of course earlier is better  • Coordination with Physics & Detector groups just starting • Very aggressive scope and schedule • However we are building on the RDR and the Interim report Nick Walker - PAC, Prague

More Related