1 / 18

AFTER ACTION REVIEW

Humuhumunukunukuapua’a. AFTER ACTION REVIEW. After Action Review. Tempest Express 3. AGENDA. AAR ROE REVIEW GOALS REVIEW OBJECTIVES TE-3 SUSTAINMENT / IMPROVEMENT AREAS THE MECHANICS OF MPAT GOALS SCORE-CARD WAY AHEAD. AAR ROE. INTERACTIVE PROCESS MAXIMUM AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION

yon
Download Presentation

AFTER ACTION REVIEW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Humuhumunukunukuapua’a AFTER ACTION REVIEW

  2. After Action Review Tempest Express 3

  3. AGENDA • AAR ROE • REVIEW GOALS • REVIEW OBJECTIVES • TE-3 SUSTAINMENT / IMPROVEMENT AREAS • THE MECHANICS OF MPAT • GOALS SCORE-CARD • WAY AHEAD

  4. AAR ROE • INTERACTIVE PROCESS • MAXIMUM AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION • FOCUS ON IMPROVING THE PROCESS

  5. MPAT TE- 3 Workshop Goals • Develop procedures for MPAT support to MNF operations • Develop MPAT teamwork and habitual relationships • Improve multinational interoperability and cooperation • Provide a forum for the discussion of national HA/DR response capabilities • Practice computer network, distributed information sharing and collaborative planning

  6. OBJECTIVES • Develop an understanding of, exercise and refine crisis action planning (CAP) procedures • Identify planning requirements for a multinational response to a HA/DR scenario • Practice and refine procedures and protocols for the use of MPAT information sharing networks and collaborative planning tools.

  7. COS CPG 1 CPG 2 CPG 3 CECG TE-3 SUSTAIN / IMPROVE

  8. CHIEF OF STAFF • SUSTAIN • IMPROVE

  9. CPG 1TE-3 • SUSTAIN • Continue to Provide Briefing Templates • Balanced Mix of expertise/talent within CPGs • Encouragement of Participants to work beyond their areas of expertise • IMPROVE • Solicit Real World HA/DR experiences • Better Horizontal Co-Ordination within the CPGs • More Emphasis on Explanation of the Process

  10. CPG 2TE-3 • SUSTAIN • Red Cell is a Effective Tool to Bring out Operational Issues • Daily Collection of AAR is a Good Way to Consolidate Comments • Ice-Breaker Social a Must • IMPROVE • Highlight MPAT Homepage • Need to Finalize Exercise Scenario and Send Out in Advance to Allow For Preparation • Create More Opportunity for Odyssey Training

  11. CPG 3TE-3 • SUSTAIN • Optional Pre-TE Academics Session • Use of Consolidated Briefing Teams • Cultural / Area Tour by Host Country • IMPROVE • Time Allocated by the Mission Analysis Process • Availability of Additional Planning Products/Information • Common Terminology / Planning Process • Use of the CATS-TYR Simulation

  12. CECG • SUSTAIN • Use of Odyssey for RFI Submission and Response • Maintain Dedicated Personnel for CECG • IMPROVE • Create Form That Provides a Summary of All RFI Responses • Provide Stronger Database on Country Background, Political Subdivisions, Emergency Management Systems, etc.

  13. THE MECHANICS OF MPAT

  14. WORKSHOP SCHEDULE • The program for MPAT TE 3 is a good template for future exercises. It has a good balance of both work and cultural interaction. • A social event post formulation of CPG to facilitate better interaction from beginning

  15. ACADEMICS • Crisis Action Planning Academics with previous MPAT products should be available in the internet for participants. • The deliverables for each stage of the planning process should be stated clearly to ensure a more focused deliberation and presentation in the interest of time. • The assignment of responsibility and the format for presentation be informed to the participants early enough (before the exercise) for sufficient preparation. • Review Cdr’s guidance to assure distinguishable COAs

  16. GROUP SIZE • CPG was too large, either break CPGs into sub groups or have more CPGs

  17. MPAT TE- 3 Workshop Goals • Develop procedures for MPAT support to MNF operations • Develop MPAT teamwork and habitual relationships • Improve multinational interoperability and cooperation • Provide a forum for the discussion of national HA/DR response capabilities • Practice computer network, distributed information sharing and collaborative planning

  18. CLOSING REMARKS • MG LEE • COL STUART • COL FERRELL

More Related