1 / 11

HOW DO WE STUDY POLITICAL LEADERS ?

HOW DO WE STUDY POLITICAL LEADERS ? . THE BIG QUESTIONS: What exactly is a typology, and why is it useful to classify leaders? What are some of the best known typologies for studying political leaders? What is the difference between a “normative” typology and an “empirical” one?

yori
Download Presentation

HOW DO WE STUDY POLITICAL LEADERS ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HOW DO WE STUDY POLITICAL LEADERS?

  2. THE BIG QUESTIONS: What exactly is a typology, and why is it useful to classify leaders? What are some of the best known typologies for studying political leaders? What is the difference between a “normative” typology and an “empirical” one? How do historians, social scientists, and psychologists differ in their approach to studying leadership?

  3. SOME INITIAL POINTS: What can Malcom Gladwell’s spaghetti talk tell us about classification? (http://www.ted.com/talks/malcolm_gladwell_on_spaghetti_sauce.html ) Classifying is worth doing because it can help us to better understand why leaders do what they do and to predict behaviors Identifying the correct categories is as important as correctly classifying leaders into them There isn’t one type of leader… There are types. There isn’t one type of leadership…There are types. Different classification schemes will help us to group leaders for different purposes Mixing methods can make for good social science. Rather than going to Italy to understand the historical origins of spaghetti sauce, or doing a deep “case study” of Ragu and Prego, Gladwell’s friend collected a lot of data from a lot of observations.

  4. HOW CAN DO WE CLASSIFY GOOD LEADERS USEFULLY? NORMATIVE AND EMPIRICAL SCHEMES

  5. WE’VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT SOME EMPIRICAL CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES: There are leaders who alter somewhat the direction of history, and there are the really rare ones that create a new historical path. Most leaders in democracies do neither… Why? There are leaders who are couldn’t change history, those who were necessary to change it, and there are those whose presence alone has changed history Conservative vs. radical or “progressive” leadership (going backwards vs. going forward)

  6. THINKING ABOUT REGIMES AND TYPES OF LEADERS? ARISTOTLE’S TAKE

  7. Max Weber—a famous sociologist—focused on how leaders can be categorized by their claim to authority:

  8. CAN WE CLASSIFY MODERN LEADERS BY REGIME TYPE? LUDWIG’S TAKE (see esp. pg. 41) Tyrants (aka despots) Monarchs Visionaries (aka social engineers or totalitarians) Authoritarians Transitional leaders (sometimes called modernizing leaders) Democrats

  9. HOW DO PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO STUDYING LEADERSHIP DIFFER FROM COMPARATIVE STUDIES? Deductive (using observations, comparativists deduce principles from cases) vs. inductive reasoning (using principles, political psychological approaches usually predict a specific leader’s behaviors) Why does the historian or psychologist typically focus on just one leader rather than comparing large numbers? (Not Hermann, though) What kind of evidence do psychological studies of political leadership typically look at? Especially when looking from afar? The systematic study and mapping of personality types Early life biography, writing and speeches, interviews Medical histories Evidence from the interaction with others

  10. WHAT PSYCHOLOGICAL VARIABLES MOST INFLUENCE A LEADER’S BEHAVIOR? Motives. What big goals cause a particular leader to seek and use power?Achieving excellence? Establishing relationships with others or one’s “in-group”? Using power to influence others? Cognitive style. How does a particular leader think about problems and make judgments? How complex is her thinking and problem solving? How open is she to new and/or contradictory information? How well does she classify problems correctly and draw upon, order, and integrate different sources/types of information?

  11. WHAT PSYCHOLOGICAL VARIABLES MOST INFLUENCE A LEADER’S BEHAVIOR? Core beliefs/values (Operational code)What are this person’s givens?Efficacy vs fate? Good/Evil vs. subjective view? Life is about little problems vs. life is about large struggles? Others are motivated by carrots or sticks? Personality traits (and types, including “disorders,” which are clusters of traits) . What habitual elements (e.g. and patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion) drive the leader? Has the leader developed a personality disorder? Examples of traits: agreeableness, distrust/Examples of a disorder: paranoia, obsessive compulsiveness, narcissism

More Related