90 likes | 137 Views
Explore Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis and how deprivation and privation affect attachment, development, and behavior. Learn about the challenges in distinguishing between them and the potential long-lasting effects of maternal deprivation.
E N D
Deprivation & privation www.psychlotron.org.uk • Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis • The effects of privation (institutionalisation, extreme cases) • The extent to which privation effects can be reversed
Deprivation & privation www.psychlotron.org.uk • Researchers distinguish between: • Deprivation – an attachment forms but is then discontinued • Privation – no opportunity is given for attachments to form • In practice it is difficult to distinguish between them completely
Maternal deprivation hypothesis www.psychlotron.org.uk • Based on Bowlby’s ideas: • Attachment is important for survival • Prototypes for later relationships • Predicts developmental difficulty if the attachment relationship goes wrong: • General developmental problems • Specific issues with social development
Maternal deprivation hypothesis www.psychlotron.org.uk “Prolonged deprivation of a young child of maternal care may have grave and far-reaching effects on his character…similar in form…to deprivation of vitamins in infancy.” Bowlby (1953)
Maternal deprivation hypothesis www.psychlotron.org.uk • Spitz (1945) • Children in orphanages • Signs of ‘anaclitic depression’ • Apathy, withdrawal, helplessness, low appetite • Survival rates of children raised in prison better than those raised in orphanages
Maternal deprivation hypothesis www.psychlotron.org.uk • Spitz & Wolf (1946) • 100 psychologically normal children in long-term hospital care • Most showed signs of depression • Recovered quickly if period of hospitalisation was less than 3 months
Maternal deprivation hypothesis www.psychlotron.org.uk • Bowlby (1946) • Comparison of ‘delinquent’ (i.e. criminal) and ‘disturbed’ children • 32% of delinquents had an ‘affectionless character’ • Apparent inability to relate to others • 86% of these had experienced maternal deprivation
Disruption to attachment process Inability to form relationships with others Delinquent or criminal behaviour www.psychlotron.org.uk Lack of moral constraints on behaviour
Maternal deprivation hypothesis www.psychlotron.org.uk • Criticisms of Bowlby (1946): • Retrospective data • ‘Affectionless’ diagnosis made by Bowlby – possibility of bias • Great variation in duration of separation from mother • Overemphasised the fact of separation at the expense of the reasons for separation