1 / 17

Sarah Cotterill, Peter John, Liz Richardson Institute for Political and Economic Governance

Sarah Cotterill, Peter John, Liz Richardson Institute for Political and Economic Governance www.civicbehaviour.org.uk Presentation to Randomised Controlled Trials in the Social Sciences: Evaluating Policy Interventions, York 2009.

yoshi-byers
Download Presentation

Sarah Cotterill, Peter John, Liz Richardson Institute for Political and Economic Governance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sarah Cotterill, Peter John, Liz Richardson Institute for Political and Economic Governance www.civicbehaviour.org.uk Presentation to Randomised Controlled Trials in the Social Sciences: Evaluating Policy Interventions, York 2009 Pledge campaigns to encourage charitable giving: a randomised controlled trial

  2. Literature Review Research design Pilot study Next steps Overview

  3. Climate Change Pledge Schemes Pledgebank.com / We Are What We Do. Local Pledges CLG Community Contracts & Pledgebanks Policy context

  4. Cotterill & Richardson (2009) Pledgebanks Desk Review http://www.communities.gov.uk Measuring success of pledge campaigns: Publicise an issue - increase awareness; Success in attracting pledges (petition); Collecting data on individuals; Change behaviour Defra, 2008 Pledgebanks Desk Review

  5. Pledges and behaviour change • Commitment to a type of behaviour can lead people to identify as someone who behaves in that way – and lead to change • (Bator and Cialdini 2000) • Community Based Social Marketing • Commitments work best if: written down, public, groups, voluntary. • Combine with other marketing approaches • (McKenzie-Mohr and Smith, 1999) • Foot-in-the-Door techniques

  6. Pledges and behaviour change 2 • Observational studies suggest: • Asking people to pledge can raise recycling rates - but may just be the personal contact (Reams & Ray 1993; Thomas 2006) • Pledging can promote seatbelts (Geller, 1989) and cycle helmets (Ludwig 2005) as part of a promotional campaign. • People more likely to stick to a non-smoking pledge if they were already thinking about it (Hallaq et al, 1976) • Pledging can encourage voter registration and voter turnout (Greenwald et al 1987 – small experiment)

  7. Can a pledge scheme encourage people to adopt civic behaviour? Research Questions: Are those who are asked to make a pledge more likely to later carry out the activity, compared to people who were not asked to pledge? Does making it public encourage people to pledge and carry out the activity? Research Design

  8. Needs a civic behaviour that is observable, measurable, available across a large popn; Charitable donation: books Community Heart Children’s books and used mobile phones Measurement issues Drop-off points; postage Contamination: provide book/phone bags Who is the book/phone from - unique identifiers Outcome measure

  9. Residents in Woodhouse Park, Manchester Postcode list & PO Address Finder - exclude airport & businesses. Sampling unit = Households Approx 4772 households (2001 census) 53% social housing (1950s council estate); 39% owned. 79% house/bungalow; 21% flats 9th (of 32) most deprived ward in Manchester (2007 IMD) Population

  10. Control Group – invited to donate a children’s book or phone Pledge Group – asked to pledge that they will donate a children’s book or phone Pledge plus Publicity Group - asked to pledge that they will donate a children’s book or phone AND told the list of pledgers/donors will be published Randomisation

  11. Sample sizes • Need to know … • What proportion of control group will donate? • Difference between control and treatment response? • Institute of Fundraising, marketing companies • We could guess … … Need to pilot

  12. Purpose: Check viability of larger experiment; estimate group sizes; test out letters, pledgecards, drop-off arrangements. 163 households in Woodhouse Park Random allocation to 3 groups: Control Group – asked to donate book/phone Pledge Group – asked to pledge a donation Pledge Group – postage paid Drop off at library, community centre or post. Pilot Study September 2009

  13. Outcome = % returning a book/phone Treatment = being asked to pledge. So assume Intention to Treat analysis? Analysis at household level Simple comparison between 3 groups Control, pledge, pledge + publicity Analysis

  14. Depending on outcome of pilot …. Larger experiment November 2009 Next Steps

More Related