1 / 13

Report on Performance Evaluation of the National Fish Habitat Board

Report on Performance Evaluation of the National Fish Habitat Board. Cecilia Lewis, FWS Ryan Roberts, NFHP March 9, 2014. Evaluation Overview . Survey sent to 196 individuals made up of Board, FHPs, Fish Chiefs & NFHP Committees 28% completed the survey (57 individuals).

yoshi-fuller
Download Presentation

Report on Performance Evaluation of the National Fish Habitat Board

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report on Performance Evaluation of the National Fish Habitat Board Cecilia Lewis, FWSRyan Roberts, NFHP March 9, 2014

  2. Evaluation Overview Survey sent to 196 individuals made up of Board, FHPs, Fish Chiefs & NFHP Committees 28% completed the survey (57 individuals)

  3. Evaluation Topic Areas • General (information about respondent) • Leadership and Coordination • Support for FHPs • Delivering Funding • Measuring and Communicating Status and Needs of Habitat • Board Operations • Board Leadership

  4. Evaluation Scale • Two-part questions • Performance • Importance of the topic • Scale of 1 to 10 • 1 = Low performance • 10 = High performance • Option to choose zero (0), indicating “don’t know” or “no opinion”

  5. General Questions Overview Employer Primary Role Partnership Engagement Board meeting Attendance

  6. Leadership and Coordination Mobilizing National Support (Q2) • Performance – 44% (25) • Importance – 95% (54) Selected comment(s) “We have made some progress here and have the right partners at the table. [What] has not been done is to provide a clear picture of what we want over a 5 year period.”

  7. Leadership and Coordination Overseeing action and follow-through (Q4) • Performance – 51% (29) • Importance – 82% (40) Selected comment(s) We have done okay in this important area but our criteria are so watered down that it does not take much effort to do so.

  8. Supporting FHPs Improving Effectiveness of FHPs (Q8) • Performance – 58% (33) • Importance – 84% (48) Selected comment(s) • “The meeting in Portland was an excellent idea. Should be held annually.” • “Consider partnering with NCTC or other fed agency edcenters.”

  9. Supporting FHPs Developing Criteria for Allocating Funds (Q9) • Performance – 46% (26) • Importance – 84% (48) Selected comment(s) “It seems like FWS has more authority over where the funding is going than the national Board.”

  10. Delivering Funding Developing expanded sources of funding (Q11) • Performance – 14% (8) • Importance – 95% (54) Selected comment(s) • “This is one of the biggest failures of the Board.” • “I haven't seen much board success here, but am aware the board is developing plans to become more active in this area…”

  11. Board Operations Holding Effective Board Meetings (Q18) • Performance – 40% (23) • Importance – 81% (46) Selected comment(s) • “Definite improvement since the first year period…” • “The Board meetings cover all of the essentials and really require[s] improved engagement by some members of the Board…”

  12. Board Operations Standing Committees (Q20 a-d) Most respondents selected “Don’t know” or “No opinion” • Science and Data – 21% (12) • Communications – 39% (22) • Partnership – 46% (26) • Funding – 46% (26)

  13. Next Steps • Discuss evaluation results • Interpreting results • Determine which areas will require Board action • Moving forward • Determine how to address action items • Formulate decision points for next Board meeting

More Related