1 / 23

Catherine Dwyer and Constance Knapp Information Systems Pace University New York

“Any Time, Any Where” Faculty and Curriculum Development: Using Asynchronous Learning Tools Beyond the Classroom. Catherine Dwyer and Constance Knapp Information Systems Pace University New York. The problem . Participants are separated by great distances Have conflicting schedules

yukio
Download Presentation

Catherine Dwyer and Constance Knapp Information Systems Pace University New York

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “Any Time, Any Where” Faculty and Curriculum Development: Using Asynchronous Learning Tools Beyond the Classroom Catherine Dwyer and Constance Knapp Information Systems Pace University New York

  2. The problem • Participants are separated by great distances • Have conflicting schedules • Need secure log in • Must learn new skills • Need easy access to documents and resources • Have to collaborate on group projects

  3. The solution • Many administrative faculty tasks share characteristics of online courses • Reapply one technology for similar circumstances • Use distance learning tools (Blackboard, e-mail list serve, video conference, web log) to support faculty and curriculum development

  4. The Story of Three Projects • Faculty training and instructor resource site • Support blended course with new curriculum • Major revision of undergraduate Information Systems Curriculum • Allow faculty on campuses 35 miles apart to collaborate on IS major • Teaching Portfolio Workshops • Faculty development effort to assist in creating portfolios used for tenure and promotion

  5. Blackboard sites • Pace University is made up of five schools, including school of computing (CSIS) • Several distance learning programs administered by CSIS (NACTEL, Doctor of Professional Studies) • CSIS Blackboard server is used to host the CIS101 faculty site and the IS faculty site

  6. CSIS Blackboard Server • “Development” server, has been used for development of new courses • University also has a “production server” that hosts undergraduate and graduate courses • Go to http://bb5.csis.pace.edu/ • Sign on with username cis101password guest

  7. Pace’s Introduction to Computing (CIS 101) • The problem: • New curriculum and course structure, new topics • Addition of one hour online content • 1300 students in 60 sections per semester • Mostly part time faculty • Four campuses separated by 35 miles • The solution • CIS 101 Faculty Resource Site

  8. Resource Site Contents • Syllabus and class schedule • Training for first time online instructors • Practice tests and model exams • Solutions to homework and end of chapter exercises • Publisher instructor resources • Suggested discussion board topics and questions • Links to other resources • Weekly PowerPoint slides

  9. Faculty Access Statistics • Combining Fall 2002, Spring 2003 statistics • Every CIS101 instructor accessed the site • Average number of uses was 13 per instructor • Minimum number was 1, maximum number was 25

  10. Student Satisfaction • Indirect measure of success of faculty resource site is increase in student satisfaction with CIS101 • Comparing same instructor anonymous survey results • Average increase in student satisfaction of 20%, some increasing by as much as 48%

  11. IS Faculty Site • Spring 2003 IS Department undertook major revision of program • Conversion to all 4-credit courses • Update of topics and content

  12. The Changes • Changed the course sequence • Dropped two courses • Modified six courses • Added one new course • New curriculum rolled out Fall 2003

  13. IS Department • One department split between two campuses 35 miles apart • One urban (downtown NYC) • One suburban (Pleasantville in Westchester County) • Face to face meetings were nearly impossible to manage

  14. IS Faculty Blackboard Site • Each full time IS faculty is an instructor on the site • Host minutes and documents for revision • Also extensively used list serve to communicate and send around drafts

  15. How we used site • Document repository • Referred to site during video conferenced meetings • Also used site during end of semester face to face meeting where we produced 6 revised and 1 new syllabi in one day

  16. IS Faculty Access Statistics • 80% of full time IS faculty have accessed the site • Faculty used the site on an average of seven separate occasions • Minimum of one access and a maximum of 22 • This compares very favorably to participation in faculty meetings

  17. Teaching Portfolio Workshop • Face-to-face workshops run at one location over four days • Faculty mentor works with a group of “mentees” to develop a teaching portfolio • Faculty find it hard to make a four day commitment

  18. The Electronic TPW • The workshop begins with a face-to-face meeting between mentor and participants • Blackboard is used to facilitate additional meetings • Participants submit versions of their portfolios electronically

  19. Teaching Portfolio Site • The workshop is run like a class with many teachers • Each mentor is grouped with his/her “mentees” • Discussion boards could be used within groups • The site directs participants to other resources on the Web

  20. Analysis of TPW • Blackboard site didn’t add the value that we anticipated • Much higher drop out rate than face-to-face workshops • Allowed faculty to participate who otherwise would not be able to • Workshop format works better face-to-face

  21. What Worked • Works great as a document repository • Created a “quick and dirty” knowledge community • Any time, any where technology allowed greater participation and collaboration in curriculum and faculty development

  22. What Didn’t Work • Discussion board hardly used at all • Small groups for TPW didn’t use the Blackboard site • Multiple instructor access made IS faculty site very disorganized

  23. Conclusions • Need “friendly” Blackboard administrator • High comfort level with Blackboard translated into greater acceptance and use of resource • Practical and natural extension to the application of these tools

More Related