SESAR and the Military Venice – 28 October 2011

1. SESAR and the Military Venice – 28 October 2011 View of the Military ATM Board (MAB) SESAR and its implications on the Military Air Component Presentation by: BrigGen Hans-Georg Schmidt, Chairman MAB

2. Introductory Remarks • Significant differences • Airspace structure (present, future, changes) • Organisation ATM System (separate, integrated) • Role of military • Military development * • Seize of force • Airspace requirements • „Flexibility Margin“ ** • Civil • Military • Driving factors (civil, commercial, military) • Procurement (cycle, organization, new sytems?, adaptation)

3. Military Share of total traffic 2010German airspace Total Traffic mil share

4. Introductory Remarks • Significant differences • Airspace structure (present, future, changes) • Organisation ATM System (separate, integrated) • Role of military * • Military development • Seize of force • Airspace requirements • „Flexibility Margin“ ** • Civil • Military • Driving factors (civil, commercial, military) • Procurement (cycle, organization, new sytems? adaptation)

5. Coordina-tion of detailed require-ments • Adjust-ment of require-ments Short-term changes Allocation of Airspace Proposal for Solution Forecast of traffic flow Weekly schedule Airlines at best x-3 hours Airlines today Airspace Planning Cycle ASM Rerouting of GAT and OAT ATFCM Flying activity User X Week before X - 1 day X - 2 hours X - 7 days

6. Introductory Remarks • Significant differences • Airspace structure (present, future, changes) • Organisation ATM System (separate, integrated) • Role of military • Military development • Seize of force • Airspace requirements • „Flexibility Margin“ • Civil • Military • Driving factors (civil, commercial, military) • Procurement (cycle, organization, new sytems?, adaptation)

7. Roles and responsibilities of the Military ATM Board (MAB)

8. Roles and Responsibilities of the Military ATM Board* • States agreed that MAB is their pan-European military focal point for ATM matters • MAB develops harmonized pan-European military views and positions for civil-military ATM coordination • MAB is part of the EUROCONTROL Organisation, since EUROCONTROL is the only civil-military ATM organisation in Europe and has the largest reach in regard to the pan-European Dimension * The Military ATM Board consists of the military ATM directors of the ECTL member States (EC, NATO, S-JU and EDA are invited as observer)

9. MAB is part of EUROCONTROL, which allows to reach almost all European States ECAC NATO Iceland Azerbaijan European Union/EDA Georgia Estonia San Marino EUROCONTROL Austria Cyprus Finland Ireland Malta Sweden Belgium Bulgaria Cz. Rep. France Denmark* Germany Greece Hungary Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain United Kingdom Armenia Bosnia-Herzegov. FYROM Moldova Monaco Montenegro Serbia Switzerland Ukraine Albania Croatia Norway Turkey Canada United States

10. Strategic Level Advice and Participation* Working Level Advice and Participation Roles andResponsibilitiesof the Military ATM Board Other Organisations EUROCONTROL PC Works vice-versa for Civil coordination requests with Military EU/EC DG EASA MAB ANSB S-JU NMB MAB-Support CMIC AAB MAB-Guidance EDA CMAC Expert-Teams Mil Focus Groups NATO Mil–Mil ATM Coordination Harmonized pan-European military positions for Civ-Mil ATM Coordination * In SSC via States

11. The Aims of SES ATM Research (SESAR)

12. } Need for new systems Potential Capacity with current concept New Solutions from R&D Capacity with current system Short/Medium Term Programmes Why SESAR ?match Capacity with Demand for civil Air Transport Traffic The Problem for civil Air Transport Closing the capacity gap

13. Reasons for Delays 2009 figures

14. SESAR is a Paradigm Shift A320 SESAR ConOps – from ATC to Trajectory Management Future Past Today Radar Know the current and estimate planned a/c positions Procedural Estimate the current and planned a/c positions Trajectory Know & share the current and planned a/c positions

15. SESAR Goals vs. military Needs SESAR Goals • Triple the capacity by 2020 • Half cost • Environmental impact per flight – 10% • Increase safety by a factor 10 • 99% flights within 15 minutes of timetable • Military Needs • Military compliance with its needs without SESAR already today! • Level of operational flexibility must remain as today • Minimize (exclude) additional budgetary constraints

16. SES/SESAR – simplistic Overview • Airspace is a finite resource • More capacity can only be gained by • Putting more a/c in available airspace (e.g. less separation) • Making more airspace available (e.g. ASM & FUA) • SESAR develops concepts of operation and technical enablers to match capacity with future demand • Deployment is not simply implement what SESAR has developed, it requires in addition: • Validation that developments have met requirements • Safety & Security assessments • Regulatory amendments • Industrialization, Standardization & Certification • Cost-Benefit Analysis • Competitive Markets for required investments

17. SESAR – Challenges for the Military

18. SESAR – Challenges for the Military • Can the Military stay away from SESAR, since they do not need it? • Can the Military use the National Security and Defence “Joker” to justify non-participation? • NO • Political / economic pressure • Preserve current / future military requirements

19. SESAR – Challenges for the Military • Areas of Military Engagement • More capacity can only be gained by • Putting more a/c in available airspace (e.g. less separation) • Make more airspace available(e.g. ASM & FUA) • SESAR develops concepts of operation and technical enablers to match capacity with demand and military needs • Deployment requirements: • Validation that developments have met requirements • Safety & Security assessments • Regulatory amendments • Certification, Standardization & Industrialization • Cost-Benefit Analysis>>keep cost low • Competitive Market Inquiry for investments >> keep cost low

20. SESAR – Challenges for the Military • The military must engage / harmonize with • Relevant military State authorities • Relevant international organizations in support of States • EDA • EUROCONTROL • NATO • EU military Staff • Combine/complementefforts • avoid duplication

21. SESAR – Challenges for the Military • SUPPORT to States from international organizations i.a.w. their AoRs and expertise: • ASM & FUA – EUROCONTROL • Concepts of operation & Mil Ops Requirements – EUROCONTROL including NATO requirements • Technical enablers – EDA i.a.w. Mil Ops Requirements • Validation – EUROCONTROL i.a.w. Mil Ops Requirements • Safety assessments – EUROCONTROL + EASA • Security assessments – EUROCONTROL + NATO • Regulatory amendments – EUROCONTROL • Industrialization, Standardization & Certification – EDA • Cost Analysis – EDA • Competitive Markets – EDA in support of national procurement

22. SESAR – Challenges for the Military • Military deployment until further notice remains a State matter • States need sufficient information for their deployment decisions • The Military SESAR Forum (MSF) could be a viable option, • If • Relevant military State authorities participate • Operators • Engineers • Procurement • All relevant international organizations provide work-results from/for their Area of Responsibility • MSF reach can be expanded to include the pan-European, NATO member and PfP dimension

23. Questions C/MAB C/MAB