1 / 21

Efficacy of Topical Drug Therapy for Monkey B Virus Exposure

Efficacy of Topical Drug Therapy for Monkey B Virus Exposure. R Eberle Center for Veterinary Health Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK. Monkey B Virus. Macacine herpesvirus 1 Naturally occurring in genus Macaca Symptoms similar to HSV in humans

yul
Download Presentation

Efficacy of Topical Drug Therapy for Monkey B Virus Exposure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Efficacy of Topical Drug Therapy for Monkey B Virus Exposure R Eberle Center for Veterinary Health Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK

  2. Monkey B Virus • Macacine herpesvirus 1 • Naturally occurring in genus Macaca • Symptoms similar to HSV in humans • Serious disease is rare in natural host

  3. Monkey B Virus: Zoonotic Infections • First isolation from human case in 1932 • About 50 documentedhuman cases total • Infection usually acquired from macaques via bites or scratches • ~80% fatal if untreated, ~20% with immediate drug therapy • Was a “Select Agent” – govt controlled research (now removed from list)

  4. Current Treatment for Zoonotic BV Infections • All drugs were developed to treat HSV, not BV • Immediate post-exposure prophylactic treatment is oral ACV or oral ValACV • If any clinical symptoms are evident treatment is i.v. ACV or i.v. GCV • If CNS signs evident treatment is i.v. GCV • There is no scientific evidence that these represent optimal treatment regimens

  5. Comparative Drug Efficacy – In vitro Drug EC50 ACV 23.3 ± 4.3 AraA (Tox)5.7 ± 1.6 BUdR >200 BVDU >200 CDV 12.4 ± 2.1 EDU 14.2 ± 5.8 HBPG >200 GCV 18.4 ± 3.6 IUdR (Tox)1.3 ± 0.5 PCV 11.3 ± 1.4 PFA >100 TFT (Tox) 1.3 ± 0.2

  6. BV Mouse Model • 10-12 gm female Balb/c • Shave flank • Scarify skin • Apply 105 PFU BV (~10 LD50) • Observe 2x/day, 14-21 days • Drugs given over 7 day course Systemic = inject i,p. Topical = transdermal PLO gel

  7. BV Mouse Model: Neurological Scoring & Clinical Signs of Infection Score Clinical Neurological Signs • Abnormal tail-lift reflex (curling of ipsilateral foot/leg) • Paresis of ipsilateral hind leg, still alert & active • Paralysis of ipsilateral hind leg, still alert & active • Bilateral hind limb paralysis, scruffy coat, not very active • Immobile, tremors, dead or requiring euthanasia Normal Abnormal

  8. Systemic Efficacy ACV, PCV & EDU Start drugs day -1 for 7 days; i.p. injection 2x/day

  9. Systemic Efficacy GCV & CDV Start drugs day -1, i.p. injection 2x/day 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 CDV (mg/kg/day) 100, 50, 25, 12.5,6.2,3.1, 1.6 Percent Survival GCV (mg/kg/day) 200, 100,50,25 0 7 14 0 7 14 Days Post-Infection

  10. Neurological Symptoms GCV & CDV Start drugs day -1 for 7 days; i.p. injection 2x/day

  11. Effect of Delaying Start of Drug Therapy Virus in DRG 100 80 60 40 20 0 Virus in Spinal Cord CDV (25 mg/kg/day) GCV (100 mg/kg/day) Percent Survival -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Start of Drug Regimen (DPI)

  12. Conclusions • ACV, EDU & PCV not effective • GCV & CDV effective • Only when treatment started before virus gets into CNS • CDV more effective than GCV • CDV effective dose ~10 fold lower than GCV • High CDV doses can prevents development of clinical neurological signs

  13. Implications • To be effective treatment must start before virus invades CNS • Best to prevent virus from reaching CNS • Most effective drugs are also toxic • Cannot use drugs most effective against BV • GCV & CDV are also toxic, so treatments are in-patient • Use of less effective drugs may be bad • Ineffective inhibition mayallow virus to replicate & invade nervous system • Infection becomes harder to treat effectively once neurological symptoms become evident

  14. Possible Alternative Approach: Topical Drug Treatment? • Some toxic drugs can be used topically • Patients can self-medicate • Lower cost (out-patient) • Easy to administer, likely high patient compliance • Can initiate treatment soon after exposure • Early peripheral treatment may stop virus from accessing the nervous system

  15. Trial Topical Drug Treatment 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 Neurological Score 5% GCV 5% CDV Days PI Days PI 0 7 14 21 0 7 14 21 Treatment started at: 3 hr PI 6 hr PI 24 hr PI

  16. Screening of Drugs for Topical Efficacy 100 80 60 40 20 0 All drugs at 3% Start treatment at 4 hr PI 3x/day for 7 days % Survival Veh ACV PCVGCVCDVTFTRRIIUdR EDU Abrv

  17. Comparative Drug Efficacy: Survival 100 80 60 40 20 0 5% 3% 1% 0.3% 0.1% Vehicle Start drug treatments at 24 hr PI 3x/day for 7 days RRI 0 7 14 Days Post-Infection 100 80 60 40 20 0 100 80 60 40 20 0 CDV GCV 0 7 14 Days Post-Infection 0 7 14 Days Post-Infection

  18. Comparative Drug Efficacy: Neurological Signs 0 1 2 3 4 5 5% 3% 1% 0.3% 0.1% Vehicle Start drug treatments at 24 hr PI 3x/day for 7 days RRI 0 7 14 Days Post-Infection 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 CDV GCV 0 7 14 Days Post-Infection 0 7 14 Days Post-Infection

  19. Future Experiments • Dual drug regimens: GCV + RRI CDV + RRI • Dual drug efficacy once BV is in CNS • Temporal efficacy of CDV suppression of BV replication in the skin

  20. Acknowledgements Collaborators/Personnel: Dr Lara Maxwell Dr George Wright Darla Black Vet Pharmacol CEO GLSynthesis Lab Manager Funding: Dolphin Fdn, ACLAM Fdn

  21. Questions?

More Related