1 / 30

Building a Better IT Support Model for Success at Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Discover strategies from Indiana University of Pennsylvania to succeed in a complex computing environment. Learn implementation tactics, transitioning to continuing operations, and current success strategies for IT professionals.

yule
Download Presentation

Building a Better IT Support Model for Success at Indiana University of Pennsylvania

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building a Better IT Support Model:Making Banner Work Presented by: Bill Balint, Indiana University of Pennsylvania

  2. SessionGoal To acquaint attendees with strategies developed at IUP that provide success in the face of an increasingly complex computing environment – particular focus on the IT professional. Implementation strategies will be examined as will transitions that allow for successful continuing operations.

  3. Topics of Discussion/Agenda Slide • Indiana University of Pennsylvania – Banner-related Profile • Primary implementation challenges • Steps to combat those challenges • Migration from implementation to continuing operations • Current strategies for success

  4. About IUP • 14,200 students, 1,800 employees • Largest Member, 14-school Pa. State System (PASSHE) • Doctoral I • 3 campuses; graduate center; clock-hour programs • Located in Indiana, Pa.

  5. Banner at IUP • Banner 7.x • Implemented 1998-2000 • All five baseline modules • Four web self-service products • Banner Xtender Solutions, Workflow • Eight major satellite packages (facilities, Id Card, etc.) • Some 100 custom-written programs and web applications • Substantial custom-built data warehouse • Oracle 9i, 10g App. Server • Linux as of Nov., 2006

  6. Implementation Challenges • Aggressive timeframe • New functionality desired immediately: “Where’s the fancy stuff we paid for that the sales people showed us?” • Tight Budgets • Extra costs maintaining legacy environment in addition to implementation costs • Inadequate Staffing • Keep all current systems running and implement at the same time with the same people

  7. Remedies • Perfect World • Add more time • Get more people • Spend more money • Real World • Policy Decisions • Personnel Distribution • Technology Investments

  8. Sample Key Policy Decisions • Define overall business needs immediately • Integrated system, web-based services, redeploy IT staff, etc. • Determine “gap fill” strategy immediately • Build, buy, modify or do without

  9. Sample Key Policy Decisions • Go by the “textbook” and modify from there • Sungard has done this many times before • Trust them, but hold them accountable! • Make quality count from the start • Exclusive time commitment by staff, appropriate consulting levels, written list of specific deliverables

  10. IUP Implementation Core Personnel • Project Leadership • Executive Steering Committee • Empowered and Available • Steering Committee Chair • Contract issues, problem resolution • Project Manager • Daily operations, problem escalation • “The person that worries about the project every day”

  11. IUP Implementation Core Personnel • Implementation Teams (One per module) • Directors of impacted offices • Work Team chairs • Responsible for INB, web self-service, interfaces • Cross-team groups formed for Workflow, Luminus, ODS/EDW, Xtender if required • Work Teams • Temporary or ad-hoc • Build validation tables, evaluate reporting needs, create training • Functional/Technical mix

  12. IUP Implementation Extended Personnel • Technical Support • Manages all technical resources • Installs, upgrades, work team assignments, etc. • Ensures that DBAs and developers are properly trained • Deploys viable technical infrastructure • Coordinates functional training on tool set • Banner navigation, reporting tools, etc.

  13. IUP Implementation Extended Personnel • Quality Reviewer • Auditing and systems knowledge, independent assessments • Project “outsider” • Data Integration Team • Data standards, data integration issues • IR functions/data warehouse • ODS/EDW if applicable

  14. IUP Banner Implementation Structure

  15. Migrating to Continuing Operations - Functional • Executive Steering Committee • Individuals partner with CIO in oversight role • Prioritizes deployment of custom-built solutions, Banner enhancements, other packages, upgrades, etc. • Process Teams • Re-configured into operations groups (student, resource, institutional advancement, financial aid) • Ensures smooth on-going operations, tests upgrades, enhancements, new products, etc.

  16. Migrating to Continuing Operations - Functional • Data Integration Team exists on an “as needed” basis • Warehousing, IR, address, duplicate Ids, etc. • Quality Reviewer, Project Manager, Work Team members • Return to pre-project roles

  17. Migrating to Continuing Operations - Technical The emerging Banner-related computing environment… • is more complex… • Workflow, XTender Solutions, Luminus, ODS/EDW, etc. • requires expertise in more technologies… • Oracle 10G DB, XML, Messaging, OAS • requires a true 24 x 7 support strategy… • Most of the above in a web-based world …But resources to support it are not growing

  18. Building Blocks For Success • Reduce User Support Needs • Fast, Effective Support Triage • Create Redundant Expertise • Long-range Planning • Enterprise Upgrades • Professional Development

  19. Sample Support Reduction Techniques • Rely on “Sungard Higher Education” technology • For Banner: Pro*C, PL/SQL, web self-service products, limited MS-Access solutions • Other applications: interfaces, separate schemas, etc. • Actively Lobby For Increase in Functional Knowledge/Skill • New hires, new job descriptions, training program • Special help for ‘the willing and able’

  20. Sample Support Reduction Techniques • Build reference web pages and specialized training material • Ad-hoc reporting, letter generation, “How To” documents • Emphasize Operational Support • Registration, fiscal year-end close, payroll cycles, etc.

  21. Sample User Support Page

  22. IUP IT Triage System • Create a Help Desk for all IT Services • All calls and resulting actions documented in tracking software • Creates knowledge base • Invest in tools that prevent/help correct problems • DBA support software, code management • Help Desk Support • Level I – student worker • Level II – generalist • Level III – expert • Level IV - vendor • Route large support requests to quarterly ranking

  23. IUP Triage System

  24. Build Redundant Expertise • Each module/sub-module assigned to primary and backup support person • Finance, HR, Advancement, Financial Aid, Admissions, Registrar, A/R, “Other” student functions • Primary support is responsible for all knowledge transfer to the backup • Documentation, 1-on-1 meetings • Support requests routed to backup at times to help that person gain expertise

  25. Enterprise Upgrade Planning • Maintain Upgrade Calendar with executive approval • Create functional and technical timelines as far in advance as possible • Prepare Infrastructure Changes Well in Advance • Oracle 10G, desktop requirement compliance

  26. IT Staff - Professional Development • Cast a wide, yet cost-effective net • Traditional – conferences, instructor-led training, Banner help and release guides, Listserves, periodicals, etc. • Non-traditional – home-grown knowledge base, web-based instruction, internal knowledge transfer sessions and web pages, industry web sites, etc. • Make professional development part of employee evaluation

  27. Benefits To The Institution • Efficient, documented customer service • Call tracking -> Knowledge Base • Objective rationing of IT resources • Quarterly rankings, help desk call results • Planning and professional development help staff navigate change – which can directly lead to productivity enhancements

  28. Summary • Large-scale software implementations are stressful, costly and difficult • The migration to continuing operations is also challenging • The Banner-related computing environment is also becoming more complex, further taxing IT staff • However, strategies do exist that can help achieve excellence in utilizing their enterprise information systems

  29. Questions?

  30. Contact Information Bill Balint Interim Chief Information Officer Indiana University of Pennsylvania Email: wsbalint@iup.edu Phone: 724-357-7854

More Related