80 likes | 169 Views
X-Ray Gratings Mission. Flight Mirror Assembly Thermal Mike Choi 19 – 23 March 2012. Thermal Difference from IXO or AXSIO. All flight mirror assembly (FMA) modules in this study have gratings IXO had a CAT X-Ray Grating Spectrometer (XGS) study at IDL in May 2009
E N D
X-Ray Gratings Mission Flight Mirror Assembly Thermal Mike Choi 19 – 23 March 2012
Thermal Difference from IXO or AXSIO • All flight mirror assembly (FMA) modules in this study have gratings • IXO had a CAT X-Ray Grating Spectrometer (XGS) study at IDL in May 2009 • Only 4 of 24 FMA outer mirror modules had gratings • Most mirrors have direct view of metering structure • Grating typically has low emittance and significant thermal impact • Mirrors have direct view of gratings instead of metering structure • Gratings form a thermal radiation barrier between mirrors and metering structure
Thermal Model Mirror Module Non-Conductive Pre-Collimator: 13.6 cm Tall Mirrors Grating
Worst Hot Case Temperature Predictions: EOL and 0˚ Pitch ˚C ˚C Mirror Segments No Heaters On Metering Structure. Heaters On Conductive Portion of Pre-Collimator and Module Walls. Heater Power : 450 W peak (315 W average) for 16 Mirror Modules and Gratings.
Worst Cold Case Temperature Predictions: BOL and -45˚ Pitch ˚C ˚C Mirror Segments No Heaters On Metering Structure. Heaters On Conductive Portion of Pre-Collimator and Module Walls. Heater Power : 470 W peak (329 W average) for 16 Mirror Modules and Gratings.
Heater Power Summary *Average is peak multiplied by 70% per GOLD Rules. **Heater resistance is sized based on Vmin2/R=470 Pitch or roll has small impact on heater power because: ·FMA is thermally isolated from spacecraft bus. ·Grating surfaces facing metering structure have low emittance.
FMA Heater Power Prediction • Worst cold case heater power prediction is 470 W for 16 mirror modules and gratings • Mirrors have no heat gain from metering structure which has no active heater control • Heater power may be reduced by increasing non-conductive pre-collimator height • For example, increasing height from 13.6 cm to 18.6 cm reduces heater power from 470 W peak (329 W average) to 421 W peak (295 W average) • Difference from IXO: IXO FMA had heaters on metering structure and pre-collimator/module walls • Mirror modules had no gratings • Mirrors gained heat from both heated metering structure and pre-collimator/module walls • Heater power for metering structure reduces heater power for pre-collimator/module walls
Heater Control for Metering Structure: Conclusion and Recommendation • It is assumed that gratings have low emittance surfaces facing metering structure • They reduce heat radiation between mirrors and metering structure • Presently emittance is assumed to be 0.1 • Unlike IXO or AXSIO, if emittance of gratings is low (about 0.1 or less), active heater control on metering structure close to FMA is not required • Heater power prediction for 16 mirror modules with gratings is 470 W peak (329 W average) • Heater power may be reduced by increasing non-conductive pre-collimator height (e.g., increasing height from 13.6 cm to 18.6 cm reduces heater power from 329 W to 295 W average) • Heaters on metering structure would be required if emittance is not low • Measure emittance of gratings and repeat thermal analysis if it is significantly larger than 0.1 • Refine heater controller set points in thermal model to meet 20˚C±0.5˚C or better