1 / 10

2013 CMT RESULTS

Riverside School, Greenwich, CT. 2013 CMT RESULTS. (Connecticut Mastery Tests). Grade 3 – Top scores at goal in math and reading for the district. Outperformed the DRG A district average at the goal level. Math 97.5% vs. 87.4% Reading 88.8% vs. 82.4% Writing 86.3% vs. 81.0%

yuri
Download Presentation

2013 CMT RESULTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Riverside School, Greenwich, CT 2013 CMT RESULTS (Connecticut Mastery Tests)

  2. Grade 3 – Top scores at goal in math and reading for the district. Outperformed the DRG A district average at the goal level. • Math 97.5% vs. 87.4% • Reading 88.8% vs. 82.4% • Writing 86.3% vs. 81.0% Percentage at Mastery (goal) Results vs. DRG (Demographic Reference Group) A(Darien, Westport, New Canaan, Weston, Wilton, Redding, Ridgefield, and Easton)

  3. Grade 4 – Top scores at goal in math and reading for the district. Outperformed the DRG A district average at the goal level. • Math 92.9% vs. 91.1% • Reading 91.6% vs. 86.7% • Writing 90.6% vs. 85.9% Percentage at Mastery (goal) Results vs. DRG (Demographic Reference Group) A(Darien, Westport, New Canaan, Weston, Wilton, Redding, Ridgefield, and Easton)

  4. Grade 5 – Top scores at goal in math, reading, writing, and science for the district. Outperformed the DRG A district average at the goal level. • Math 96.3% vs. 91.4% • Reading 95.1% vs. 89.0% • Writing 95.1% vs. 85.6% • Science 96.3% vs. 88.4% Percentage at Mastery (goal) Results vs. DRG (Demographic Reference Group) A(Darien, Westport, New Canaan, Weston, Wilton, Redding, Ridgefield, and Easton)

  5. TOP RANKED SCHOOL Students at Goal or Above #1 school in Math and Reading (all grades) #1 school in Writing and Science (grade 5) Riverside as compared to State • RANKED #8 OF 523 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS • Top 1.5% of all elementary schools in the state • SchoolDigger rating is 5/5 stars for both Riverside and Eastern Middle School • Eastern Middle School ranked 6 out of 255 middle schools in the state AS REPORTED BY SCHOOLDIGGER.COM 2012 (waiting for 2013 ranking) Riverside as compared to Greenwich

  6. Over the last 4 years of CMT testing, student performance, grades 3 – 5, percentage at advanced in Reading is as follows: 2009-10 40% 2010-11 45% 2011-12 45% 2012-13 47.4% Reading at Advanced

  7. Our School Improvement Plan (SIP) Student Outcome Indicator Results from 2012-2013: Reading CMT Advanced Level for students moved from 45% to 47.4% (overall goal to move to 50%)

  8. Overall School Improvement Team Goal for 2012-2013(in support of the district goal of 83% of grade 3 students at goal in reading by ‘14-’15): Grade 3 students achieved 88.8% in reading at goal or above (top 3rd grade in district).

  9. Our School Improvement Plan (SIP) Student Outcome Indicator Results from 2012-2013: 90% of K, 1, 2 students to be independently reading within the GPS grade level range as measured by spring 2013 F & P benchmark assessment. 100% of K students within range in spring. 89% of Grade 1 within range in spring. (With ESOL students taken into account – over 90%) 93.3% of Grade 2 within range in spring.

  10. If you have additional questions about your child’s individual performance on the CMT, please contact your child’s teacher. Thank you!

More Related