1 / 12

Context

Going for growth Feedback to Council Monday 28 th October 2013 Richard Dale Executive Director of Finance and Programme Lead. Context. 2012/13 performance was good: strong I&E and balance sheet Healthy outlook for 2013/14 and good forecasts for later years Student recruitment excellent

zach
Download Presentation

Context

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Going for growthFeedback to CouncilMonday 28th October 2013Richard DaleExecutive Director of Finance and Programme Lead

  2. Context • 2012/13 performance was good: strong I&E and balance sheet • Healthy outlook for 2013/14 and good forecasts for later years • Student recruitment excellent • Research income back on track Opportune moment to look at size and shape • Thriving in the new dispensation • Strong cash balances • Emerging evidence of capacity constraints • Weak income growth in recent years

  3. The case for growth • There is a correlation between reputation and size • There is a correlation between research quality and size • We have been losing market share • We need to be larger to be cost effective • Impact on the local economy And why not? • We are a popular choice for students • We have freehold development land • We have lots of cash and capacity to borrow

  4. RG ranking vs income

  5. RG research GPA vs income

  6. Total income 2001 – 2012 (2001/02 = 100) Overall position in Russell Group: 14th in 2001/02, 18th in 2011/12 Research income in Russell Group: 16th in 2001/02, 17th in 2011/12

  7. What we won’t be doing … • We won’t sacrifice quality for quantity: academic excellence and student experience remain paramount • We won’t sacrifice our commitment to research led teaching • We won’t take our eye off the ball from existing commitments including responding to this year’s growth in student intake • And we won’t undertake any new projects without sufficient staff - academic, support and project management - to ensure their success.

  8. The story so far … • EB mini away day 25th May • Presentation to lay members of Council 17th June • Follow up EB discussion 4th July • Creation of “long list” July/August • EB away day 23rd September • Initiation of programme management October • Initial feedback to Council 28th October • Creation of SIG November • Feedback to heads of unit 21st November • Initial feedback to Senate 26th November • Further discussions at Senate/Council TBA

  9. Programme objectives • Grow the University’s total income from £400m in 2012/13 to £500m by 2017/18 • Enable simultaneous progress on initiatives to improve academic quality, student experience and research excellence • Identify and address resource constraints including buildings, equipment and staff

  10. The initial project list New degrees • Sports and exercise science (CD) • Physics (SH) • International Management Programme (CH) • Logistics and Supply Chain Management(CH/SH) • Media/Culture Lab (CH) Strategic developments • MOOC’s (SC) • Engineering curriculum (SH) • Xiamen (ER/CH) • London (ACS) • INTO NUMed (ACS) • Science Central (SH) • Innovation (NW) • US MBBS provision (CD) • Philanthropy (CD/AK)

  11. Questions to address • Do the proposals enhance quality and reputation? • Do the proposals maintain a strong teaching/research balance? • Are the proposals realistically achievable? • Are the proposals worth the effort? • Will the proposals be financially sustainable in the long term? • Do we have capacity to deliver? • Quality of school/institute leadership • Project management capacity • Estate and infrastructure capacity • Academic capacity

  12. Next steps • Request for input for NU Connections and directly • Initial feedback to Senior Officers Group, Heads of Unit Forum, Council and Senate • Creation of Special Interest Group (SIG) • Creation of programme management processes and governance • Identify and implement quick wins to address resource issues arising from this year’s growth • Deep dive to create business and academic cases for initial project list • Report back to Council and Senate early next year – an ideal topic for the next joint meeting?

More Related