640 likes | 886 Views
07/09/2012. A. K. Paul. 2. Rating in Marine (Hull and Cargo) Insurance Portfolio. PastPresentFuture. 07/09/2012. A. K. Paul. 3. History of Marine Insurance. AncientRichnessVarietyInterest. 07/09/2012. A. K. Paul. 4. . Role of Marine Insurance. Overseas and internal tradeLinked with banking and
E N D
1. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 1 IRDA Seminar on proposed De-tariffing programme in Non-Life Insurance 13th to 14th March, 2006
Hotel Taj Krishna
Hyderabad
2. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 2 Rating in Marine (Hull and Cargo) Insurance Portfolio Past
Present
Future
3. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 3 History of Marine Insurance Ancient
Richness
Variety
Interest
4. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 4 Role of Marine Insurance Overseas and internal trade
Linked with banking and shipping
Ship-owners / merchants not legally bound to insure
Hardly any choice, due to modern methods of financing
5. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 5 Categories of Marine Insurance Cargo
Hull
6. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 6 Peculiarities of Marine Underwriting Insure any commodity that can be moved from one place to another
7. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 7 Knowledge required by Marine Underwriter All types of cargo
Susceptibility of cargo
Conditions at various places
Packing
8. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 8 Ability of Marine Underwriter Decide and tell at a glance
Terms of cover
Rate of premium
9. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 9 Importance of information Unlikely to complete Proposal Forms
Elicit as much relevant information
Correct assessment of risk
Decide upon rates
Decide upon terms of cover
10. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 10 Pooling of knowledge Marine Cargo Underwriters are individualists
Little desire to pool their knowledge
In fact, active resistance against such objective
11. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 11 Reason for resistance Varied nature of cargo
Varying terms of cover
Varied individual experience
International nature of transaction
12. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 12 Challenges of Cargo Underwriting Very competitive
Compelled to accept risks at very thin rates
Yet ensure profitability
13. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 13 Rating factors Basis of valuation
Physical properties / sensitivities
Condition and packaging
Residual value
Normal and expected losses
Recoveries from carriers
14. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 14 Rating factors (continued) Modes of transportation – pre and post ocean
Duration of cover
Length
Route
Transshipment
Port conditions / facilities
Inland transits
15. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 15 Rating factors (continued) Physical environment enroute / destination
Seasons
Storage conditions
Socio-economic environment
Past claims experience
Conditions of insurance / deductibles
16. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 16 Hulls As per English practice
Air-borne crafts
Water-borne crafts
17. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 17 Subject matter of Hull Insurance Air-borne crafts with their machinery – Aviation Hull Insurance
Water-borne crafts with their machinery – Marine Hull Insurance
18. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 18 Reasons for separation Different trading environment
Ever-increasing sophistication
19. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 19 Basis of Marine Hull Policy Time
Voyage
20. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 20 Marine Hull categories for rating / underwriting Major ocean-going fleets
Inland vessels
Fishing vessels
Ocean-going sailing vessels
Fixed jetties and pontoons
21. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 21 Marine Hull categories for rating / underwriting (continued) Builders’ risk
Ship-repairers’ liability
Port crafts
Offshore properties / activities
22. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 22 Factors for rating Hull risks Physical features
Type of construction
Age / repair cost
Size
Class
23. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 23 Factors for rating Hull risks (continued) Physical features (continued)
Value
Overall
Per ton
Country of registration
Flag of convenience
Nature of cargo carried
24. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 24 Factors for rating Hull risks (continued) Physical features (continued)
Engine power / Navigational equipment
Area of operation (Trading zone)
Climatic conditions (Lay-up periods)
Purpose for which the vessel is engaged
25. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 25 Factors for rating Hull risks (continued) Ownership / management quality
Experience
Loss / claims record
Financial stability
Size of fleet
Moral hazard
Type of crew engaged
Unduly high insured value
26. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 26 Factors for rating Hull risks (continued) Conditions of insurance, including quantum of deductible
27. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 27 To make profitable Hull Insurance portfolio Specialised class of business
Demands extreme underwriting caution
To be handled by technical experts
Judicious selection of risks
28. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 28 Risk information Completed Proposal Form necessary in all cases
29. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 29 Terms of Insurance for vessel / fleet Varying from TLO / CTLO to ALL RISKS
As per Standard Hull Clause
30. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 30 Extent of cover Ocean-going vessels
Full conditions
Coastal / inland crafts
Limited cover
31. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 31 Hull premium Rate per cent of Sum Insured
Components
Total loss
Other than total loss
32. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 32 Payment of Hull premium Hull Insurance effected for 12 months
4 quarterly installments
Full annual premium payable if Total Loss
33. 07/09/2012 33
34. 07/09/2012 34
35. 07/09/2012 35
36. 07/09/2012 36
37. 07/09/2012 37
38. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 38 Total Loss Trends By number, by tonnage, as %age of world fleet:-
Downward trend
Despite the losses of 2002, overall improvement in recent years.
Trend arrested in 2002
The most influential factors:-
Age & weather
39. 07/09/2012 39
40. 07/09/2012 40
41. 07/09/2012 41
42. 07/09/2012 42
43. 07/09/2012 43
44. 07/09/2012 44
45. 07/09/2012 45
46. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 46 Partial Loss Trends Machinery / Engine Room Damage
Highest frequency
Highest overall cost to Underwriter’s book
All age and vessel types
Underwrite – Loss Prevention & Risk Assessment
Do we consider engine types enough?
Are we happy with class surveys of engines?
Should we be covering machinery at all?
Should there be a (25%) coinsurance for machinery?
An allowance for betterment in respect of older tonnage?
47. 07/09/2012 47
48. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 48 Market Results Worldwide Acute Results
6 – 8 years of appalling losses
Implications
Capital withdrawal
Collapse of hull insurance market
Dramatically reduced choice for shipowners
Remedy
Increase rates urgently
49. 07/09/2012 49
50. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 50 Casualty, Shipping & Underwriting Statistics Marine Hull Insurance Market still losing money internationally
Shipping world is relatively unchanged
Greater exposure
Rating wholly inadequate
Capital withdrawal imminent
Brave underwriting required
Shipowners can afford to pay for healthy market
Urgent action required now for Market survival
51. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 51 Underwriting Pattern Of Marine Risks
52. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 52 International Scenario Largely Non-Tariff Throughout The World – Basically Governed By Demand And Supply.
53. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 53 Hull The Flat Hull Market Has Seen Little Improvement In Terms Of Profitability For Hull Insurers – Thus Few New Entrants.
Claims Front – Cost Impact Is Affecting Those Insurers Writing Large Lines.
High Risk Construction Risks Being Tackled By Good Risk Management.
54. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 54 Cargo Fierce Competition Has Led To A Debilitating Slump In Cargo Premiums.
55. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 55 Indian Scenario
56. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 56 Past In India, Marine Cargo Business Used To Be Fully Tariffed Till A Few Years Ago.
But, In Course Of Time, All The Tariffs For Different Cargo Risks / Commodities Have Been Gradually Dismantled Completely – Including War Risks And Strikes, Riot And Civil Commotion Risks.
Hull Tariff Has Also Been Withdrawn Recently.
57. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 57 Present Market Is Extremely Soft, Driven By Intense Competition.
Even Adverse Claims Experience Is Not Reflected In The Renewal Terms – Fear Of Loss Of Fire And Engineering Businesses, Which Are Still Profitable Portfolio.
This Practice Needs To Be Deprecated.
58. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 58 Future The Two Profitable Portfolio – Fire And Engineering - To Be Detariffed In January, 2007 – Likely To Result In Lower Premium Incomes.
Thus, The Subsidy Lent To The Marine Business By Such Profitable Portfolio Should Reduce.
59. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 59 Marine Insurance Underwriting Being Truly Experience-Based, Each Insurer Will Need To Define Its Underwriting Philosophy And Develop Its Own Database.
60. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 60 Hopefully,Adventurous Acceptances Will End And The Volatile Marine Market Will Attain Balance.
Ultimately, The Sense, Intuition And Imagination Of The Marine Underwriter Will Prevail.
61. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 61 IRDA, In Its Developmental Role For The Betterment Of The Industry – Should Guide The Insurers, Providing Meaningful Statistics (Internal And International) On The Behaviour Of Various Risks And Underwriting Results Of Individual Portfolio.
62. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 62 “The Key To Successful Underwriting Is To Ask When You Have Doubts.
The Worst Thing You Can Do When You Smell A Fish Is To Use Deodorant.
Use Your Nose Instead, And Search Until You Have Found And Eliminated The Bad Smell From Your Book.”
63. 07/09/2012 A. K. Paul 63 Thank you