220 likes | 769 Views
Increasing the Yield of Fat Extracted from Processed Foods With Petroleum Ether. Jacob Glaspey Nathan Horter. Fat Extraction Methods. Laursen and Mernitz (1) – petroleum ether Folch Method (2) – chloroform-methanol Super Critical Fluid (3). Lower Toxicity Lower Cost Less Complicated.
E N D
Increasing the Yield of Fat Extracted from Processed FoodsWith Petroleum Ether Jacob Glaspey Nathan Horter
Fat Extraction Methods • Laursen and Mernitz (1)– petroleum ether • Folch Method (2) – chloroform-methanol • Super Critical Fluid (3)
Lower Toxicity Lower Cost Less Complicated Quantitative Well Tested Less Time Required for Extraction Method Advantages Petroleum Ether Chloroform-Methanol
Low Yield Time Intensive More Toxic Higher Cost Method Disadvantages Chloroform-Methanol Petroleum Ether
Goals of Our Investigation We want to: • Increase the yield of petroleum ether extraction. • Keep the complexity, cost, and hazards close to those of the control method. • Be able to use our new method as an improved educational method.
Control • The volume of the petroleum ether solvent is 10 mL. • The sample was extracted in the solvent for 1 hour. • The extract was then dried overnight and weighed.
Our Experiments • Experiment A – We increased the length of time of extraction. • Experiment B – We increased the volume of solvent used. • Experiment C – We altered the Folch Method by using petroleum ether instead of chloroform-methanol
Experiment A • The length of time of extraction was increased from 1 hour to 2 hours. • This experiment was designed to determine if the rate of the fat being pulled into solution was the limiting factor of the control.
Experiment B • The volume of the solvent was increased from 10 mL to 20 mL. • This experiment was designed to determine if the saturation of the solvent was the limiting factor of the control.
Experiment C • The volume of the solvent was increased from 10 mL to 20 mL. The solvent and sample were then washed after the extraction with 4 mL of de-ionized water. • This experiment was designed to determine if the procedure of the Folch method could improve the yield of our extraction.
Statisticawhatsit? • We calculated whether our experiments produced significant increases over our control using a two sample t test. • The t value from these tests gave us a value of P. • P is the probability that the two results are the same due to random variation.
Significance of Results • Experiment B increased the yield by 11%. (P<.005) • Experiment C increased the yield by 21%. (P<.001)
Future Experiments We’ll try: • Drying the sample before extraction • Using an acid digest on the sample before extraction • Testing other low toxicity solvents • Incorporating an extraction apparatus
Soxhlet Extractor • Known to increase yield to > 90%. • Classroom availability? • A little expensive. • VERY time consuming. (Around 16hrs for pet ether.) camel.campbell.edu/~chemistry/ faculty/jung/
Sonicawhatsit? • It’s SONOCHEMISTRY. • It (Jon, that is) may be of use to us. • Sonication of the sample to decrease particle size may increase yield. • Emulsifying the pet ether with the sample by sonication may increase yield. • It may cause chemical reactions that break down fat. Nonetheless… • Please Jon, help us.
OK, WE’RE DONE.
Resources • Laursen, Sandra; Mernitz, Heather. “Would You Like Fries With That? The Fuss About Fats In Our Diet”. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2000. New York. • Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Sloane-Stanley, G.H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1957, 226, 497-509. • Eller, Fred J.; King, Jerry W. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Fat from Ground Beef: Effects of Water on Gravimetric and GC-FAME Fat Determinations, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry; 2001; 49(10); 4609-4614.
Any QUESTIONS?