1 / 12

Organizational Structures For Decision Support and Reporting

Organizational Structures For Decision Support and Reporting University of Missouri Reporting Task Force March 13, 2003. Institutions Explored. University of Illinois University of Kansas University of Michigan University of Minnesota University of Wisconsin-Madison.

zahir-hart
Download Presentation

Organizational Structures For Decision Support and Reporting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Organizational Structures For Decision Support and Reporting University of MissouriReporting Task ForceMarch 13, 2003

  2. Institutions Explored • University of Illinois • University of Kansas • University of Michigan • University of Minnesota • University of Wisconsin-Madison

  3. Overall Impressions • Transaction Systems and Decision Support Functions are Separate but Coordinated • Institutions Have Established New Processes, Functions, Units, Roles • Efforts to Create Decision Support Environments are University-Wide and Cross Organizational Boundaries • Institutions Have Developed In-depth Reporting and Data Access Strategies and Plans • Institutions Have Developed Integrated Data Stores

  4. University Characteristics University Size (Number of Students) UI KS WI MI MO MN 28,849 41,507 53,000 60,556 65,800 56,572

  5. University Characteristics Number of Campuses Fewer Greater WI KU MI UI MN MO

  6. University Characteristics Decision Support Solution Home System - Centric Campus - Centric WI MN UI KU MI KU MI MN WI UI Centralized De-Centralized Decision Support Solution Orientation

  7. University of Illinois http://www.ds.uillinois.eduhttp://www.ds.uillinois.edu/dw_strategies.asp Transaction Systems Data Store AVP – Planning & Budget AITS UI-Integrate Project Staff AVP – Administrative Information Technology Services Decision Support Office X-Campus Steering Team Strategic Mgmt Team Functional Staff Technical Staff

  8. University Of Kansas http://www.ku.edu/~oirp/demis.shtmlhttp://www.ku.edu/~vcinfo/DataWarehouse/KMIDTF%20Full%20Report.htm DEMIS Transaction Systems Data Warehouse Office of Institutional Research and Planning

  9. University of Michigan http://www.mais.umich.eduhttp://www.umich.edu/~uip/sdp Data Warehouse MAIS Reports Provost, EVP Acad. Affairs EVP, CFO ODS Transaction Systems Michigan Admin. Info. Services * Enterprise Application Services* Leadership and Administration* Systems Divisions (HR, FIN, Stud.)* Technical Infrastructure* User Services

  10. University of Minnesota http://www1.umn.edu/oit/enterprisemanagement UM - Reports EVP and Provost Transaction Systems Data Warehouse Office of Information Technology Project Mgmt Office Enterprise Mgmt Systems Other Units Application Development and Maint.Enterprise Web DevelopmentInformation Management Systems

  11. University of Wisconsin-Madison http://wiscinfo.doit.wisc.edu/infoaccess InfoAccess Query Library/Brio Transaction Systems Office of the Chancellor Data Warehouse DoIT Office of Quality Improvement

  12. Overall Impressions - Restated • Transaction Systems and Decision Support Functions are Separate but Coordinated • Institutions Have Established New Processes, Functions, Units, Roles • Efforts to Create Decision Support Environments are University-Wide and Cross Organizational Boundaries • Institutions Have Developed In-depth Reporting and Data Access Strategies and Plans • Institutions Have Developed Integrated Data Stores

More Related