140 likes | 228 Views
On the source of the diffuse background light in HUDF. Tuguldur Sukhbold Dr.Henry C. Ferguson Timothy Dolch Space Telescope Science Institute Aug 19, 2010. HUDF. Zodiacal Light >90%. Possible Sources.
E N D
On the source of the diffuse background light in HUDF TuguldurSukhbold Dr.Henry C. Ferguson Timothy Dolch Space Telescope Science Institute Aug 19, 2010
Possible Sources Low Z Galaxies VS Low z Galaxies (e.g. Kashlinsky et al. 2005) (e.g. Thompson et al. 2007) • Zodiacal Light • Faint Structures • Data not high resolution and crowded • Detector Issues • Method of Analysis
New in this Summer Work • New set of data: UDF 05-01 & UDF 05-02 (Illingworth et al. 2010) • New method of analysis: P(D) • Improved Simulation
Processing • Iteratively remove detector blemishes • Combined dithered images with some masking • Transfer combined image back to original image geometries and subtract • Smooth and detect blemishes or persistence • Mask and recombine for the final image • Create pure noise images in original detector coordinates • Gaussian statistics okay for these images; match sky background • Predicted RMS matches measured RMS to within a few percent • Combine these just as for the real images • Mask the detected sources
Analysis: P(D) • Create a shuffled version of the image • Unmasked pixels are randomly shuffled, removing correlations • For both the shuffled and unshuffled version: • Convolve the masked images with kernels of various sizes • Compute the histogram of pixel intensities P(D) • Subtract the shuffled P(D) from the unshuffled P(D). • Excess is amplified when kernel matches the characteristic size of the sources
Simulation Inclination Position angle Tune 2 parameters: • Slope of the Galaxy count • Size of the galaxies
Validation The galaxy count slope and the sizes are recovered
Preliminary Results • Previously result on UDF-main: • F105W: α = 0.7, r = 0.24’’ • F125W: α = 0.65, r = 0.24’’ • F160W: α = 0.65, r = 0.24’’ • New Result on UDF-main: • F160W: α = 0.6, r = 0.12’’ • New Results on UDF 05-01: • F105W: α = 0.6, r = 0.12’’ • F125W: α = 0.6, r = 0.30’’
Future Directions • More sophisticated models • Galaxy redshift and SED distributions • Galaxy Clustering • Limiting magnitude variation • Change arrays • Better calibration of detector issues: hot pixels, persistence and bad cosmic ray rejections
References • Abraham et al. 1998 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AGM....14..E08A) • Bock et al. 2006 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006NewAR..50..215B) • Illingworth et al. 2010 (http://archive.stsci.edu/proposal_search.php?mission=hst&id=11563) • Kashlinksy et al. 2005 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PhR...409..361K) • Thompson et al. 2007 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...657..669T)