1 / 11

A Socioeconomic Baseline Assessment of the Pribilof Islands

A Socioeconomic Baseline Assessment of the Pribilof Islands. Marine Science Symposium January 2007. Project Background. Research supports the Pribilof Islands Collaborative (PIC).

zalman
Download Presentation

A Socioeconomic Baseline Assessment of the Pribilof Islands

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Socioeconomic Baseline Assessment of the Pribilof Islands Marine Science Symposium January 2007

  2. Project Background • Research supports the Pribilof Islands Collaborative (PIC). • Issues of common concern among the stakeholders are declines in fur seal and seabird populations, diminishing halibut catches, and the attendant effects on the local communities. • In 2004, the PIC identified several socioeconomic data gaps that would help the PIC and others plan for and mitigate eventual fishery management measures and enhance local stewardship of marine resources.

  3. The Pribilof Islands - Methods The overarching objectives of this research are to: • Establish the value of the halibut and other fisheries in the Bering Sea – both to the region as a whole and to the islands. • Identify community and island-specific impacts of changes in fisheries. • Document history of and potential for local environmental and economic stewardship of marine resources. • Quantify the economic importance of subsistence harvests of halibut, fur seals and other resources.

  4. The Fisheries • A 2005 NOAA study found that St. George did not meet any of the 11 criteria established for identifying fishing communities in Alaska, and St. Paul only met 3 criteria. • Evidence suggests that both islands very much used to be fishing communities, but have undergone changes in recent years that may have reduced the role of fisheries • More survey respondents “used to be” fishermen (27%) than are currently fishermen (16%). • In 1999, CBSFA employed 177 people. In 2004, they had 87 employees. • In 1999, total revenues for the City of St. Paul were $3.67 million. In 2005 the total revenues were $590,000. • In 1999, total general fund revenues to the City of St. George were $1.2 million, but in 2004 were only ~$40,000. • CDQ groups have been and continue to be large contributors to the economies of both islands.

  5. Subsistence: Consumption • 80% consume subsistence food occasionally or more. • For 65%, subsistence foods account for 20% or more of overall consumption. • Cost (St. George) and taste (St. Paul) are the primary reasons for consumption of subsistence foods. Other major reasons are health and culture/tradition.

  6. Subsistence: Culture/Tradition • The majority of subsistence harvesters (81%) share their harvests at least occasionally. • The majority of individuals on St. George (70%) and St. Paul (84%) who do not participate in subsistence harvests receive subsistence food from others. • Personal choice (St. George) and natural factors (St. Paul) are most likely to affect participation in subsistence harvests.

  7. The Environment and Environmental Stewardship • 44% of St. Paul respondents feel the environmental quality is “very good” or “extremely good”. Only 31% of St. George respondents feel similarly. • The majority of respondents on St. George (81%) and St. Paul (63%) feel that, at least to some degree, the environmental quality of the islands is getting worse. • 42% of St. George respondents and 62% of St. Paul respondents currently participate in environmental stewardship activities.

  8. The Economy • Approximately 75% of respondents work at least part-time, with another 12% of respondents being retired. • 70% of respondents have lived off-island at some point during their life. • We analyzed census data from 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 for all Alaska communities to look for relationships between population, income and unemployment. • The majority of respondents believe the economy is getting worse.

  9. Conclusions • There is not a simple, stable socioeconomic “baseline” for the Pribilof Islands; however, • The use of methods to gather local and traditional knowledge provided key information not previously available. • Results showed that residents of the Pribilof Islands are keenly aware of changes that are occurring on their islands. • A repeat of this study in five or ten years would give some indication of trends in comparison with the baseline we’ve established.

  10. Special Thanks and Acknowledgements To • The people of St. George and St. Paul • The Pribilof Island Collaborative and its members • The Traditional Council of St. George and Tribal Government of St. Paul • Our on-island project partners, Max Malavansky Jr., Aquilina Lestenkof, Phillip Zavadil and Haretina Porath • Stephanie Martin • The North Pacific Research Board

  11. Questions or Comments?

More Related