410 likes | 583 Views
Taking Action to Restore Water Quality in New Hampshire's Coastal Region: Threats, Problems, and Solutions. . A Presentation to the Southeast Watershed Alliance (SWA)Prepared by the SWA Advisory Committee. Presentation Overview. Part I
E N D
1. Issues Solutions Concerns Impacts Spell out smart acronym. Spell out smart acronym.
2. Taking Action to Restore Water Quality in New Hampshire’s Coastal Region: Threats, Problems, and Solutions
3. Presentation Overview Part I – Regional Water Quality Problems
Water Quality Status and Trends
Regulatory Drivers
Part II – Taking Action
Pollution Sources
Solutions
Define “drivers”Define “drivers”
4. We live in a beautiful and healthy state #3 on 2008 list of healthiest states
#2 in percent forest cover
7th lowest in per capita energy consumption
New Hampshire has more than 17,000 miles of rivers and streams, over 1,000 lakes, and 294 miles of ocean and estuarine coastline.
5. We have major challenges ahead Land use – sprawl
Water quality – stormwater
Habitat loss – fragmentation
Infrastructure – water and sewer systems
Climate change – precipitation and sea level
These challenges all come together in our watershed.
6. The Physical “Piscataqua Region”
7. Fix northwood label on numerous towns. 3 statesFix northwood label on numerous towns. 3 states
8. If you live near any of these red bodies of water, DES/EPA will be regulating. If you live near any of these red bodies of water, DES/EPA will be regulating.
9. PREP Indicators Report
10. Dry Weather Bacteria Concentrations Have fecal coliform bacteria levels in the Great Bay Estuary changed over time?
Yes. Bacteria levels in Great Bay decreased significantly in the 1990s but have not changed in the past 10 years. Water quality standards for swimming and shellfishing are not being met in all areas.
11. Advisories at Tidal Bathing Beaches
12. Toxic Contaminants in Shellfish Tissue Have the concentrations of toxic contaminants in the tissues of shellfish changed over time?
Yes. The concentrations of PAHs have increased by 51% in Portsmouth Harbor and by 218% in the Piscataqua River over the past 16 years. Concentrations of other contaminants are declining.
13. Nitrogen in Great Bay Have nitrogen concentrations in Great Bay changed significantly over time?
Yes. The total nitrogen load to the Great Bay Estuary has increased significantly. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations have increased in Great Bay by 44% in the past 28 years. Delete these Q and A slides if graph makes same point. Delete these Q and A slides if graph makes same point.
14. Nitrogen Loads to the Great Bay Estuary
15. Nitrogen, Suspended Solids, and Chlorophyll-a in Great Bay Highlight non-point source pollution impacts.Highlight non-point source pollution impacts.
16. Dissolved Oxygen How often do dissolved oxygen levels in the estuary fall below state standards?
Rarely in the bays and harbors but often in the tidal rivers.
17. Dissolved Oxygen at Datasondes
18. Eelgrass Has eelgrass habitat in Great Bay changed over time?
Yes. Eelgrass cover in the Great Bay has declined by 37% between 1990 and 2008 and has completely disappeared from the tidal rivers, Little Bay, and the Piscataqua River.
19. Eelgrass in Great Bay in 2008
20. If you live near any of these red bodies of water, DES/EPA will be regulating. If you live near any of these red bodies of water, DES/EPA will be regulating.
21. Impacts on Communities Regulatory fines for non-compliance
Drinking water threats – quantity and quality
Increased expense for drinking water treatment
Unsustainable water withdrawals
Increased flooding impacts
Toxic cyanobacteria blooms in ponds/lakes
Loss of rural aesthetics (sprawl, traffic, etc.)
Loss of wildlife habitat and diversity
Preventing problems is cheaper than fixing them
22. Regulatory Drivers Clean Water Act Requirements (EPA/DES) - Impairments Identified - Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) - Loading allocations - Municipal stormwater (MS4) permits - Residual Designation Authority
Instream flow regulation
Stressed subwatersheds (too many withdrawals) MS4 = municipal separate storm sewer systemMS4 = municipal separate storm sewer system
23. Part II – Taking Action Pollution Sources
Solutions
24. Major Causes of Water Quality Impairments Water Quality
Problems
25. Pollution Source: Stormwater Runoff Solutions:
Protect natural stream/wetland buffers
Preserve wetlands and natural areas
Minimize impervious surfaces
Stormwater retrofit projects
Effective regulatory stormwater management requirements for all new development and re-development- Low Impact Development techniques- Maximize on-site infiltration- Require water quality treatment
26. Pollution Source: Transportation (oils, carbon, nitrogen, road salt) Solutions:
Invest in mass transport
High efficiency/alternative vehicles
Smarter transportation planning
Stricter NOx tailpipe emissions requirements
Stormwater treatment
27. Pollution Source: Energy Production (burning fossil fuels) Solutions:
Transition to renewable energy
Stricter NOx emissions requirements
28. Pollution Source: Wastewater Treatment Plants Solutions:
Treatment plant upgrades to remove nutrients
Couple nutrient removal with commodity production (e.g. algae) Insert sewage treatment plantInsert sewage treatment plant
29. Pollution Source: Septic Systems (typically only remove ~25% of N) Require best available technology for new or replacement systems (~50% N removal)
Larger setbacks from surface waters to let vegetated buffers take up N and bacteria
30. Pollution Source: Landscaping Fertilizer Solutions:
Reduce/eliminate fertilizer use
Buffers and setbacks from surface waters
Slow-release fertilizers
Minimize lawns, utilize low-N species
Rain gardens
31. Pollution Source: Agriculture Solutions:
Sustainable on-site fertilizer application
Minimize inorganic N fertilizer use
Proven best management practices (e.g. sediment and erosion control)
Manure containment
Buffers along waterways
Organic farming Show picture of dairy and horse farmsShow picture of dairy and horse farms
32. Big Picture Solutions – Land Use is Key Population growth and increases in impervious surfaces (i.e. pavement) increase pollution
36. The Piscataqua Region Environmental Planning Assessment Evaluated every municipality in the region for:
Wildlife Habitat Protection
Wetland Protection
Shoreland Protection
Stormwater Management
Erosion & Sediment Control
Drinking Water Protection
Floodplain/Hazard Planning
Impervious Surface Limits
Non-Regulatory Conservation Efforts
37. Shoreland buffer requirements vary dramatically by stream size and among town jurisdictions.
Shoreland buffer requirements vary dramatically by stream size and among town jurisdictions.
Shoreland buffer requirements vary dramatically by stream size and among town jurisdictions.
Shoreland buffer requirements vary dramatically by stream size and among town jurisdictions.
38. Local Stormwater Management Requirements Add list of PREPA topics? Add list of PREPA topics?
41. Issues Solutions Concerns Impacts Spell out smart acronym. Spell out smart acronym.