360 likes | 509 Views
The Dawn of Creation and the Beauty of the Universe. Wichita State University April 6, 2010 Steven Beckwith University of California. Hubble 1929. Expansion of the universe. H 0 = 73 km/s/Mpc. H 0 = 500 km/s/Mpc. H 0 = 73 km/s/Mpc. 300,000. Redshift cz (km/s). Riess, Press,
E N D
The Dawn of Creation and the Beauty of the Universe Wichita State University April 6, 2010 Steven Beckwith University of California
Hubble 1929 Expansion of the universe H0 = 73 km/s/Mpc H0 = 500 km/s/Mpc H0 = 73 km/s/Mpc
300,000 Redshift cz (km/s) Riess, Press, & Kirshner (1996) 30,000 3,000 1,000 100 10,000 Distance (Mpc) Expansion history of the universe Constant in past (expected) Slower in past (big surprise!) Farther in the past Perlmutter et al. (1999) Riess et al. (1998)
Galaxy Clusters & Dark Matter 1: Determine the mass in stars from the light 2: Determine the gravitational mass needed to bind the energies of the galaxies (from the velocities): kinetic energy = -½ gravitational energy Zwicky found that: Mgravity ~ 50 Mstars
t0 = 13.73 ± 0.12 Gyr The Standard Cosmology tot = 1.0 ± 0.1 h≈71.9 ± 2.6 M = 0.258 ± 0.030 L = 0.742 ± 0.030 b = 0.02273 ± 0.00062 ns = 0.963 ± 0.014 TCMB = 2.726 ± 0.010 ºK zreion = 11.0 ± 2.6
The Universe at 300,000 years T = 2.726 K DT = 3.35 mK DT = 18 µK DT = 6 µK The Cosmic Microwave Background
Waves & Prefered Scales Wave amplitude spectrum Amplitude 1/5 m-1 1 m-1 5 m 1 m direction f(Hz)
Temperature fluctuation power (mK2) Size scale of fluctuations 90º 2º 0.5º 0.2º 1º
8.8 3.3 1.8 1.0 0.8 Tnow 13.7 Gyr Ultra Deep Field Tthen (Gyr) UDF Skywalker http://www.aip.de/groups/galaxies/sw/udf/
Debra Elmegreen and colleagues (2005) Galaxy Morphologies Chain Clump-cluster Double Tadpole Spiral Elliptical
B V i z Galaxy Distances: The Lyman Break 912 A V z = 0 13.7 Gyr B i z z = 1 5.9 Gyr z = 4 1.6 Gyr B-dropout z = 5 1.2 Gyr Steidel et al 1999, ApJ,462, L17
i-Drop Morphologies Milky Way at high redshift Galaxies when the universe was <1 billion years old
z850 Dropouts (z ~ 7, 780 Myr) Oesch et al. 2010, arXiv:0909.1806v2
Discovering New Phenomena After Fig. 3.10 in Cosmic Discovery, M. Harwit 1010 Detection technology 108 Telescope technology Electronic James Webb Space Telescope Sensitivity Improvement over the Eye 106 Photograpic Hubble Space Telescope 104 Short’s 21.5” 102 Rosse’s 72” Mount Wilson 100” Mount Palomar 200” Soviet 6-m Herschell’s 48” Slow f ratios Huygens eyepiece Galileo 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Year of observation
JWST HST & JWST Census of galaxies: 5 < z < 20 Re-ionization of universe HST SNAP Galaxy sizes, shapes & luminosities: 0 < z < 10 Creation of “beauty” Expansion history: 0 < z < 2 Dark matter vs. time & space TMT LSST Dynamics of assembly & composition: 0 < z < 5 Expansion history: 0 < z < 1 Wide-field surveys with small telescopes: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, Evolving Structure
Structure develops as gravitational collapse competes with anexpanding universe. 1 Gyr z=6 3.3 Gyr z=2 13.7 Gyr z=0 The growth rates depend on the way that gravity acts within the expansion history. Discrepancy between the growth rate of structures predicted by general relativity during the expansion of the universe would be a smoking gun for New Physics. Image credit: V. Springel
Remnant structure from early sound waves Longitudinal "wave" Transverse "wave" Predicted galaxy distribution Cosmic Microwave Background Expected wavelength = 150 Mpc = standard ruler The spectrum of “wavelengths” in the distribution of matter (galaxies) tells us how the frozen in pattern of early sounds waves has evolved with universal expansion.