150 likes | 318 Views
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice. U Y A P. NATIONAL JUDICIARY INFORMATICS SYSTEM SOME FACTS OF UYAP. Court System of Turkey. Constitutional Court. General Ciriminal Courts Felony Courts Magistrate Specialized Courts. Higher Courts. Criminal Courts. First Instance courts.
E N D
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice U Y A P NATIONAL JUDICIARY INFORMATICS SYSTEM SOME FACTS OF UYAP
Court System of Turkey Constitutional Court • General Ciriminal Courts • Felony Courts • Magistrate • Specialized Courts Higher Courts CriminalCourts First Instancecourts Supreme Court • Peace courts • General civil courts • Specialized courts CivilCourts TaxCourts Administrative Courts (Regional) of Appeal Council of State Administrative Courts
Average duration of assize in Turkey before UYAP. İn the past: General Courts : Penal : 266 days Civil : 241 days C.o. Cassation Penal : 283 days Civil : 86 days Council of State : 460 days The duration of the cases has been shortened significantly thanks to UYAP
The number of disputes in Turkey 1.416.739 PROSECUTIONWRITS 4.314.766 PROSECUTIONPREPARATION 2.673.374 CRIMINAL CASES 2.180.305 CIVIL LAWCASES 390.312 ADMINSTRATIVE CASES 9.640.669 ENFORCEMENT CASES 20.616.164 GRAND TOTAL All these disputes have been processed by UYAP
CABLE LAYING • All judiciary units were connected to with each other via sole central network. This connection was provided through territorial lines and satellite. These connection types are the substitutes for each other. Cable was laid in 807 units to deliver 45.778 connection points across Turkey. ANKARA
UYAP with Numbers 4.500.000 lines of Code More than 3000 user interfaces More than 4000 reports and document templates
UYAP with Numbers • All over the Turkey, 123 out of 133 Heavy Penal Court Centres, 21 out of 25 Administrative Regional Courts, 435 out of 575 small county courts and all of the Penitentiary and Detention Houses have been rolled out until now and the rest of them will have been rolled out at the end of 2007. • There are currently 34.250 users (judges, prosecutors and other staff) doing their all judicious job by using system and this number has been rising day by day. • All units have carried out their all processes via UYAP from the beginning of dissemiation (26.04.2004) and 24.714.923 files have been entered via UYAP until now. In all of the units taken into operation, nearly more than 50.000 new files are being entered to the system every day. • The number of documents has been exceeded more than 65 million and nearly 200.000 new files are being added everyday • The number of e mail account is 90.000 and there 55.000 active e mail users in the system and 250.000 e mails are being processed everyday . • 18.992 lawyers have been registered to lawyer’s portal and 4517 of them use this system actively.
General Characteristics • n-tier architecture, web-based, centralized system, • Object-oriented software development technology, • Java and J2EE V1.3 architecture, • User interface by applets, • Word processor, digital sign, coded documents • Single sign-on, • Using smart cards during login and access to improve security • Integration with other systems in e-goverment scope, • Menu and work flow driven processes within the system
General Characteristics Can support multiple platforms All Framework of the Project deployed to Oracle Application Server at Automation of Election Information System Adaptable to changing laws UYAP Framework Oracle Application Server Deployed with no need to modification
THE SAVİNGS OF UYAP İN 2006 (example) UYAP has enhanced the authority of the state, ensured victims to reach the justice immediately, and made easy to punish offenders as they deserved. As a result public confident has been achieved in justice services thanks to transparent and rapid justice, causing stability and peace in the society and growth in the economy.Those mentioned developments, in terms of their consequences are progresses augmenting the confidence of the citizens for the judiciary and show that the impact is sustainable. The value of the services provided through UYAP can not be assessed only on costly bases.. However, through UYAP some consequences assessable on costly bases are achieved in the above: