420 likes | 498 Views
Distance Course for Training Trainers in the Use of Flexible Learning and PBL Rolf Carlsson Roza Dumbraveanu Ulla Högberg Göran Karlsson Bengt Olsen. Content. Course aims Pedagogical models Mechanics course Course objectives Mechanics distance course Course structure
E N D
Distance Course for Training Trainers in the Use of Flexible Learning and PBL Rolf Carlsson Roza Dumbraveanu Ulla Högberg Göran Karlsson Bengt Olsen
Content • Course aims • Pedagogical models Mechanics course • Course objectives Mechanics distance course • Course structure • Course operation • Participant activities • Metaphors to use • Crucials • Pros and cons • International project cooperation
Rolf Carlsson Rolf Carlsson Datakonsult AB, Sweden e-mail: Rolf.Carlsson@centrinity.se Roza Dumbraveanu State University of Moldova, CHISINAU, Moldova e-mail: roza@usm.md Ulla Högberg University of Karlstad e-mail: ulla.hogberg@kau.se Göran Karlsson Department of Mechanics, KTH e-mail: karlsson@mech.kth.se http://www.mech.kth.se/~karlsson Bengt Olsen Centrinity AB, Kristallen, SE-752 38 UPPSALA, Sweden e-mail: Bengt.Olsen@centrinity.se http://www.centrinity.se
Constructivism Knowledge must be constructed by the learner; it cannot be supplied by the teacher Instructivism – Constructivism
Main course objective 1(5) Have such knowledge of the use of ICT and flexible education that they independently can plan and carry out education using ICT
Main course objective 2(5) Have got such experiences that they can foresee and forestall problems that usually occurs in education implemented with ICT
Main course objective 3(5) In a pedagogically creative way use the possibilities that ICT offers
Main course objective 4(5) • Comprehend that the important components in • a successful flexible education are • Technology • Organisation • Pedagogy • Economy
Main course objective 5(5) Comprehend which the critical factors for success are and the new role of the teacher
Course structure 1(6) • 20-40 partipants per course • On-line preparatory course • Solving start-up technical problems • Learning FirstClass • Planning the homework assignment
Course structure 2(6) • One day introductory conference • “Get together” • Course presentation • Lectures on Distance learning, Group communication and special features • Small group planning • Questions about FirstClass • Evaluation
Course structure 3(6) • Distance education (4 weeks) • Conferences • Seminars • Homework assignments • Problem of the week
Course structure 4(6) • Mid-course meeting • Video-conferencing about PBL • Course problems discussed • Systems/platforms information • Group work
Course structure 5(6) Distance education continued (4 weeks)
Course structure 6(6) • Breaking-up day • Experiences • How to avoid the problems we have had? • Deeper studies in special areas • Moderator’s role and activities • Evaluation and “how can we make this course better” • Collegial network?
Conference structure • Café • Staff-room • Bulletin board • Student room • Directory • Seminars • Assignments (7) • Group rooms • Library • System questions • Pedagogical room • Evaluation • Competition
Assignments Dead-lines with one - two weeks intervals • Grouping on basis of interest • Seven assignments for all groups • 1. Arguments pro and con • 2. Planning your own project • 3. Pedagogics and learning styles • 4. Problem based learning • 5. Your own assignments • 6. Your own Conference structure • 7. Your own Study guide
Seminars Society and organisations Reproduction-Construction Technology • Other groups • Every group is three weeks responsible for • Formulating seminar problems • Monitoring that the other groups participate • Summarize the discussions • Applying ideas from PBL
Participant activity 1(5) Relative activity per weekday
Participant activity 2(5) Total number of messages per week DLU11 Participants’ and intructors’ activities distributed on weeks Number of entries Week
Participant activity 3(5) Total number of messages per hour DLU11 Participants’ activities distributed on hours 20 Number of entries 40 20 0 0000-0001 0002-0003 0003-0004 0004-0005 0005-0006 0006-0007 0007-0008 0008-0009 0009-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-1300 1300-1400 1500-1600 1600-1700 1700-1800 1800-1900 1900-2000 2000-2100 2100-2200 2200-2300 2300-2400 1400-150 Hour
Participant activity 4(5) Different conferences activity
Participant activity 5(5) Number of messages per participant (all messages)
Course administration • Manager • Course leader • Course assistant • Subject expert
Agora Huddinge • Computer Science Basic and Continuation course • Windows, Word, Excel, computers and their effect on individuals, groups and society • 60 hours of study during 16 weeks • 36 students (21 male and 15 female) • Technical requirements • IBM compatible computer with Internet connection • Windows 3.x or Windows 95 • MS Word 6.0 or better • MS Excel 5.0 or better
ICTI Virtual Consultancy Mind maps with MindManager
Check that everybody has got functioning access and has been able to log in. Clear admission requirements (in subject, computer experiences and the English language – since many entered links refer to sites using English). Be sure that everybody has understood the course aim, its goal and its objectives. Inform about the necessity to devote daily time to course. Some experience points to remember 1(6)
Optional course/s in general computer training, word processing etc. Check (and if necessary train) general computer literacy. Not too many participants (max. 40). Not too large groups (3-5 participants per group). Introduce group members to each other at first course meeting. Some experience points to remember 2(6)
Appoint a responsibility leader for each group. Let the group members sign a contract about their responsibilities to the group and peers. Continuously stress participant accountability.a Assist so that client-server connectivity functions. Inform about activity need and consequences (for the inactive and others) if that is not followed. Some experience points to remember 3(6)
Do not encourage participants to send you personal e-mails, but rather use group communication with the fellow learners. In this way distance learning does not require more instructor effort than conventional teaching. Support individual searching but collaborative learning. Request absent messages (in e.g. a specific conference). Some experience points to remember 4(6)
Give technical support, particularly in the beginning. Check participant presence and contact if necessary. Not too many conferences in the beginning, better to split or start new ones later. Some experience points to remember 5(6)
Not too large homework assignments. Assist participants to reduce their too high personal self-demands on form quality. Check quality of work and react if necessary. Some experience points to remember 6(6)
Distance studies can be combined with other activities. Lower cost for companies; ordinary job can partly continue. Access to a large pool of available course via the network. Individual curriculum can be designed. Social contacts through meetings, network group work and discussion conferences Participants’ opinions 1(3) Pros
Instructors not trained for this form. Still teaching colleges continue to train for traditional teaching. Distance studies require more participant discipline. Increased dropout risk. Companies do not understand what it is. Participants’ opinions 2(3) Cons
Companies believe it is very expensive. Companies believe in intensive courses at isolated places. Lack of human social contacts Participants’ opinions 3(3) Cons
Participant accountability: contracts, moderator Project oriented learning Peer communication Face-to-face gatherings Activate Instructor in background but reacts Conclusions