210 likes | 385 Views
Outline for a ONS micro-data access and release strategy. Richard Laux, Paul J Jackson NSID. New strategy. Advice is requested : On scope and coverage of the strategy On how and when any strategy should be communicated On what timescale any strategy should be implemented
E N D
Outline for a ONS micro-data access and release strategy Richard Laux, Paul J Jackson NSID
New strategy Advice is requested : • On scope and coverage of the strategy • On how and when any strategy should be communicated • On what timescale any strategy should be implemented • On the preferred change process
Where we are - Policy An ONS Micro-data Policy is in preparation : • Draft agreed by SPC in July • Defines, and makes distinct, micro-data ‘release’ and micro-data ‘access’ • Provides a matrix relating access method to User, purpose, and disclosiveness of data. • From which can be derived the best access solution: • Licensed use via an archive • Off site - access agreements • Off site - remote access • On site - laboratory / secondment
Where we are - Regulation Micro-data Release Panel. • In place to regulate all release and all access to ONS micro-data. • Proved concept • Offer completeness of audit • Checks for Code and Protocol compliance in all cases • Has accumulated an ONS-wide knowledge of customer demand, user needs, data availability, and quality of service.
Where we are - Licensed use Current practice : • Social survey data are deposited at UKDA as a matter of course. • Census SARs deposited at CCSR • Suitable for low-risk / low utility micro-data only. • Minimal set-up cost • Low maintenance • The full potential of the UKDA is not realised.
Where we are - Off site Current practice : • Intra-GSS access under SLAs • Other researchers and LAs • Ad-hoc arrangements (approx 50 per annum) for non-GSS research institutions. • Suitable for medium-risk / medium-utility microdata. • High maintenance. • Confidential data leaves ONS - requires meaningful control, and compromises what we can pledge • Not consistent across ONS
Where we are - remote access Current practice : • Welsh Assembly access to IDBR • NOMIS • (Future) NeSS and Census commissioned outputs • Suitable for analysing high-risk / high-utility microdata. • High set-up cost • Low maintenance (if crude rules are applied to outputs). • Confidential data does not leave direct ONS control • not popular with expert research users • in silos
Where we are - laboratory Current practice : • BDL • CRAB • LS • Suitable for high-risk / high-utility micro-data. • No confidential data leaves ONS • High set-up and high maintenance (mostly in screening applicants and disclosure checking outputs) • Inconvenient for many users unless there are labs distributed around the country • In silos, and not consistent in ONS
Where we are - International Current practice : • Dennis Trewin paper sets out a framework for micro-data access • ONS not at the forefront • But does have the expertise either in prototypes or in silos.
Strategy is needed - User demand Evidence based policy making requires : • Bespoke statistics to meet very specific policy needs, • Small area statistics for devolved decision making, • Longitudinal statistics to monitor policy delivery, • Interdisciplinary statistics to describe inter-agency initiatives, • Validation by the academic research community, • High quality data, improved by feedback from expert users.
Strategy is needed - more demand Vast increase in the number of agencies performing this work : E.g. - North East Regional Information Partnership consists of around 50 agencies working for North East public service authorities - all of which have stated a need for access to unperturbed, high-utility, multi-source micro-data. And claim to be able to use it.
Strategy 1. Present micro-data access as a single corporate service. • A single route for all users, via the website, directing them to the optimum solution for their stated needs and their status.
Strategy 2. Provide a spectrum of solutions based on a transparent matrix of User type, purpose, and disclosiveness of data. • Enhanced use of the UK Data Archive. • Intra-GSS off-site access under agreements • A corporate remote-access facility • A corporate on-site laboratory • A number of franchised laboratories across UK
Strategy 3. Make micro-data access a horizontal specialism. • Regulation is already horizontal (MRP) • SDC standards same across the service. • A single ‘micro-data access team ’ drawn from existing services across the Office • Delivers user screening, advice, training, output checking - on behalf of the Office. • Single point of contact and relationship with Users
Strategy 4. Build remote access lab and on-site data lab into the design for CORD and CORM • A window into CORD: no silos of micro-data • A common language for analysing data 5. Seek funding support from the wider research community
Enhanced UKDA • Recommend : • Sources to require that all micro-data that can lawfully be deposited at UKDA should be placed there, • in a form suitable for management on our behalf and/or on our instruction, • its use regulated by MRP or a Sources Policy body.
Intra GSS • Recommend : • Ensure all GSS members use an SLA relating to data supply. • Ensure the SLA is annexed by a data access agreement • Ensure all pledges allow for our data to flow within the GSS.
Remote Access • Recommend : • Support the BDL Expression of Interest as a corporate facility for remote access to high-utility micro-data • Build in Tau-Argus • Develop standardise and practicable SDC criteria for outputs.
Laboratories • Recommend : • Make BDL/CRAB a corporate facility within the modernised ONS • Sources to place all relevant micro-data within the facility on request • Tau-Argus plus SDC standard criteria • (ESRC grant?)
Benefits • Many users, especially in the Regions, are users of statistics in general, not particular sources of statistics. A single point of contact will lead them to the best sources. • Many users don’t want the responsibility of having micro-data in their possession - remote facilities and laboratories will be welcomed. • Better use of UKDA is very efficient for ONS • Corporate solutions are better for ONS, and better for users too. • Corporate solutions are more likely to get financial support from the User community • Corporate solutions can react in a rapid and consistent way to legal and policy changes.
Advice • On scope and coverage of the strategy • On how and when any strategy should be communicated • On what timescale any strategy should be implemented • On the preferred change process