130 likes | 700 Views
606 CMR 14.00: Criminal Offender and Other Background Record Checks - Emergency Regulations EEC Board Meeting December 10, 2013. 1. Background Record Checks Processed by EEC. MA Criminal Offender Record Information Checks (CORI)
E N D
606 CMR 14.00: Criminal Offender and Other Background Record Checks - Emergency Regulations EEC Board Meeting December 10, 2013 1
Background Record Checks Processed by EEC • MA Criminal Offender Record Information Checks (CORI) • Department of Children and Families (DCF) Background Record Check NEW - Sex Offender Registry Information (SORI) checks with the MA Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB) database NEW - Fingerprint-based checks of the state and national (Federal Bureau of Investigation) criminal history databases
Emergency Regulations Are NOW Required • To comply with the legislative mandates of Chapter 459 of the Acts of 2012 as amended by Chapter 77 of the Acts of 2013 • To establish processes for conducting SORI and fingerprint-based checks • To provide guidance with respect to review of findings and dissemination of results
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address SORI and Fingerprint Checks • As a condition of an offer of employment, an applicant must now satisfactorily complete a Background Record Check (BRC) investigation that includes the CORI, DCF, SORI and fingerprint-based check review. • Applicants will acknowledge that, as a pre-employment condition and periodically thereafter, personal data elements will be submitted to the SORB database, in order to determine if they are Level 2 or Level 3 Registered Sex Offenders. • Applicants will be required to consent to a state and national criminal history database review and submit to a fingerprint-based scan within an established period of time.
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address SORI and Fingerprint Checks – cont’d • Background Record Check Frequency • CORI and DCF checks must be run whenever an initial offer is made and at least every 3 years for those employees who have maintained continuous employment, unless the employer determines a greater frequency. • SORI checks must be run whenever an employment offer is made and shall be run periodically by EEC. • Fingerprint-based checks must be run with the same frequency as CORI and DCF checks with the following exceptions: • candidates who have resided outside of MA during their employment period; • candidates who have disclosed new criminal charges; and • candidates who have a break in employment with an EEC licensed, approved or funded program of one or more years.
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address SORI and Fingerprint Checks – cont’d • Findings From SORI Checks • If the SORI check indicates that a Candidate is a Level 2 and/or Level 3 Sex Offender, the finding will be treated as a presumptive disqualification. • A Candidate may submit written documentation from the Candidate’s Criminal Justice Official concluding that the Candidate does not pose an unacceptable risk of harm (if not available, the Hiring Authority may seek assessment of the Candidate’s risk of harm from a qualified mental health professional) • If written documentation is accepted, EEC would then perform a Discretionary Review. • After the Discretionary Review, EEC shall notify the Candidate and the Employer whether or not the Candidate is suitable for hire.
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address SORI and Fingerprint Checks – cont’d • Findings From SORI Checks – cont’d • No Candidate may be hired in any capacity nor begin work until the SORI check is completed. • Should EEC determine, through an address match, that an individual who is a Level 2 or Level 3 Sex Offender resides in a family child home, EEC will immediately refer this information to the Licensing staff for appropriate action. Note: Since April 2013, EEC has submitted monthly address lists of EEC licensed programs to SORB. Since November, EEC has submitted approximately 27,000 names of individuals newly hired or employed in EEC licensed or funded programs for a SORI check.
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address SORI and Fingerprint Checks – cont’d • Findings From FBI Background Record Checks • Results of a Candidate’s FBI check will be provided to EEC. • EEC will review the results of the FBI check and will determine whether the Candidate poses an unacceptable risk to children. • The hiring authority may allow a Candidate, whose CORI and DCF checks have been approved by the Hiring Authority and who has been deemed suitable by EEC following a SORI check, to begin conditional employment and have unsupervised contact with children at the discretion of the program. • Following review of the FBI data, EEC will notify the hiring authority whether or not the candidate is suitable for hire.
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address SORI and Fingerprint Checks – cont’d • Findings From FBI Background Record Checks – cont’d • If the Candidate is hired, the Hiring Authority must document in the employee’s personnel file the date on which the EEC suitability decision was received and must notify EEC of the date on which the employee began employment. • If EEC deems the candidate unsuitable, the Hiring Authority must terminate the conditional employee's employment within fourteen (14) days of such notice, unless EEC informs to terminate sooner.
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address SORI and Fingerprint Checks – cont’d • Background Record Checks for Transportation Service Personnel • Background Record Checks for transportation service personnel who are employees of an EEC licensed, approved or funded program will be conducted and documented in accordance with the provisions for candidates for employment with the potential for unsupervised contact with children. • EEC licensed, approved or funded programs that contract for the provision of transportation services must: • Include in their contract provisions for the review of CORI and DCF background records for all personnel providing transportation services to the program; and • Assure that EEC renders a suitability decision related to SORI and fingerprint-based check for all personnel providing transportation services to the program.
Proposed Regulatory Changes to Address Gap in Existing Regulations • Notice of a 51A report • If a 51A investigation results in a supported 51B report, the family child care licensee, assistant, and/or in-home non-relative caregiver must immediately stop providing care, pending a complete BRC review. • An employee, volunteer, intern, or transportation provider shall not have any unsupervised contact with children pending a complete BRC review.