1 / 31

Non invasive ventilation and LV dysfunction

Non invasive ventilation and LV dysfunction. Fekri Abroug ICU. CHU F.Bourguiba Monastir. Tunisia. How can cardiogenic pulmonary edema-induced respiratory dysfunction aggravate cardiac dysfunction and circulatory failure ?. Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema. WOB . Exaggerated decrease

zea
Download Presentation

Non invasive ventilation and LV dysfunction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non invasive ventilation and LV dysfunction Fekri Abroug ICU. CHU F.Bourguiba Monastir. Tunisia

  2. How can cardiogenic pulmonary edema-induced respiratory dysfunction aggravate cardiac dysfunction and circulatory failure ?

  3. Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema WOB Exaggerated decrease in pleural pressure at inspiration Hypoxemia

  4. Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema WOB Hypoxemia risks of myocardial ischemia risks of critical organs hypoperfusion

  5. Viires et a. J Clin Invest 1983

  6. Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema WOB Exaggerated decrease in pleural pressure at inspiration Hypoxemia Increase in LV afterload

  7. Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema WOB Exaggerated decrease in pleural pressure at inspiration Hypoxemia Increase in LV afterload risks of myocardial ischemia risks of decrease in Stroke Volume

  8. Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema WOB Exaggerated decrease in pleural pressure at inspiration Hypoxemia Increase in LV afterload decrease in CaO2 risks of myocardial ischemia risks of critical organs hypoperfusion risks of decrease in Stroke Volume Risks of aggravation of cardiac dysfunction (vicious circle) and of circulatory failure

  9. How can positive pressure ventilation improve cardiac dysfunction and circulatory failure in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema?

  10. Positive pressure ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema WOB Exaggerated decrease in pleural pressure at inspiration Hypoxemia decrease in CaO2 risks of myocardial ischemia risks of critical organs hypoperfusion risks of decrease in Stroke Volume Postive pressure ventilation by breaking the vicious circle prevents aggravation of cardiac dysfunction and of circulatory failure

  11. NIV and Cardiogenic Pulmonary edema (CPE) • NIV: important tool in ARF • Reduces the need for invasive ventilation • Reduces IMV complications • Reduces ICU complications, stay, mortality • CPE common medical emergency • NIV increases cardiac output • Improves gaz exchange • Decreases endotracheal intubation • Trends towards decrease in mortality

  12. Clinical goals in CPE • Improve systemic oxygen saturation • Reduction in LV preload • Reduction in LV afterload • Oxygen through high flow facemask • Morphine • Diuretics • nitrates

  13. CPAP is effective in CPE unresponsive to medical RxPoulton Lancet 1936 • Increase in inspiratory and expiratory flow and pressure • Increases Vt • Unloads inspiratory muscles • Improves alveolar ventilation • Reexpands flooded alveoli • Counteracts intrinsic PEEP • Prevents micro-atelectasis • Improves the P-V curve relation • Increases in intrathoracic pressure reduces the left ventricular preload and afterload • Increases cardiac output in CHF

  14. Both CPAP and bilevel non-invasive ventilation proved effective in treating CPE Better than conventional oxygen therapy

  15. Intubation rate: 5% vs 33% (p=0.037) N=19 N=18 Resolution time: p=0.002

  16. 130 patients attending the ED for CPE • Randomized to • O2: n=65 • NIPSV: n=65 • Primary endpoint: need for intubation • Secondary endpoints: mortality, physiological variables

  17. Intubation rate: 25% vs 20% (p=0.5) • Mortality: 14% vs 8% (p=0.4) • Subgroup analysis: no difference P=0.01

  18. CPAP vs Conventional medical treatment: intubation rates NNT=7

  19. CPAP vs Conventional medical treatment: death rates NNT=8

  20. BiPAP vs Conventional medical treatment: intubation rates

  21. BiPAP vs Conventional medical treatment: death rates

  22. How does CPAP compare with Bi-PAP?

  23. CPAP vs BiPAP: intubation

  24. CPAP vs BiPAP: mortality

  25. 36 patients with CPE and hypercapnia (in the ED) • Randomization to CPAP (n=18) or NIPSV (n=18) • Endpoints: • Endotracheal intubation • Death rate • Resolution time (SpO2>96%, BR<30)

  26. Role of NIV in CPE due to LV diastolic dysfunction

  27. In all types of CPE, CPAP improves oxygenation • In LV diastolic dysfunction, this occurs through a decrease of LV diastolic volume (preload) and in MAP • In LV systolic dysfunction, CPAP both decreases preload and increases LVEF

  28. Greetings from Monastir

More Related