340 likes | 519 Views
Politics and the Causes of the Civil War. Introduction. Begin to see political division before the United States is formed as a nation
E N D
Introduction Begin to see political division before the United States is formed as a nation From the Declaration of Independence through the firing on Fort Sumter, North and South struggled to make compromises that would strengthen the bond between the regions. North looked at slavery as a “peculiar institution” that did not jive with founding documents. South viewed slavery as a significant part of their heritage and culture
Early Sectional Examples Regarding Slavery Declaration of Independence Northwest Ordinance of 1787 The United States Constitution Missouri Compromise Tallmadge Amendment
Political Parties of the 19th Century • Jackson creates the Democrats • Opponents create the Whigs • Free Soil Party • American Party (Know Nothings) • Republican Party
Democratic Party • Embraced labor theory of value: the proceeds of wealth should go to the person that creates the product • Did not like wage labor thus had problems with industrialization • Turned workers into slaves • Embraced immigrants: they were votes • Championed individual rights • Supported separation of church and state (Catholic immigrants applauded) • Opposed temperance • Slavery issue split • State government • Opposed tariffs, transportation improvements, national bank
The Whigs • Internal improvements • Tariffs to protect American industry and labor from low-wage foreign competition • Centralized banking system • Many embraced temperance – sober up America • Believed public schools provided opportunity for all Americans to achieve success – provided an education for all – rich or poor • Had a southern contingent of wealthy land owners who opposed Jackson’s catering to the yeoman farmers
End of the Whigs • Taylor was an apolitical war hero elected because of name recognition • Anti-Jackson party without a clear vision on slavery • Party members split into newly formed parties: 1. Free Soilers 2. Know Nothings – American Party 3. Republicans
Free Soilers • Created from Conscience Whigs and anti-slavery Democrats • Advocates of free soil, (availability of land to all in the west), free speech, and free men (abolition of slavery) • Nominated Martin Van Buren as president in 1848 and John P. Hale in 1852 • Kept issue of abolition alive, but little impact otherwise
Know Nothings • Formed in the 1850’s of frustrated Whigs and Democrats • The were what they were against: anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant • WASPS and Nativists • Opposed to large influx of Germans and Irish on the east coast in the 1840’s • Only presidential candidate: Millard Fillmore in 1856 • Split on slavery issue – not their priority • Favored temperance • Opposed taxes for parochial schools • Increase naturalization laws
Expansion Expansion of the borders further than the Louisiana Purchase caused sectional issues because the question of slavery in the territories Texas Oregon Territory Southwest
Texas Independent nation in 1836 Wanted to be annexed by US They were a slaveholding nation (mostly Americans) North didn’t want them Andrew Jackson did not want to upset the Mexican government The 1844 election of James Polk John Tyler annexed Texas in 1845 Texas was the 28th state and 15th slave state – upset balance of power
Polk • Promised 4 things • Acceptable substitute for national bank – established an independent treasury for government funds • Lower tariff rate – (Walker Tariff – 1846) • Get Oregon Territory from British • Get SW from Mexico
Mexican American War – 1845-1848 Polk wanted to acquire the California and Oregon territories He negotiated with the British to get the Pacific Northwest He went to war with Mexico to get California and the Southwest Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ceded California territory (modern day SW United States)
Unintended Consequences of War Will the new territory acquired from the treaty be slave or free? Why doesn’t Missouri Compromise apply? Wilmot Proviso Slavery would not be permitted in any territory acquired from the Mexican-American War. Southerners were not happy about this
Compromise of 1850 - Intro 1849 - Gold Rush California reached its population quota to apply for statehood California applied as a free state Southerners did not support Henry Clay and Daniel Webster came up with a solution
Compromise of 1850 - Terms Admit California as a free state Texas/New Mexico border dispute Federal government forgave $10 million of Texas debt New Mexico gets territory in question New Mexico and Utah formed into federal territories - popular sovereignty Slave Trade would be abolished in the District of Columbia Strengthen the Fugitive Slave Act Placed burden of proof on the African-American to prove his/her freedom Provided federal funds for the effort Created harsh punishments for whites who aided escaped slaves $1000 fine, 6 months in jail
Compromise of 1850 – Resolution It is debated in Congress Support Daniel Webster Opposition Salmon Chase and William Seward Jeff Davis Zach Taylor Congress voted it down Stephan Douglas tried to push it through as five separate pieces of legislation and all five pass Taylor had died, Fillmore supported the bill Civil War is averted for now
Problems with the Compromise of 1850 Fugitive Slave law breaks down South’s big win from Compromise North… Interfered with slave catchers Tried to nullify the Fugitive Slave Act Sympathy for African Americans in courtrooms North was out to get them in their eyes
The Kansas-Nebraska Act and Popular Sovereignty, 1854 Stephan Douglas (Illinois) proposed wanted to be President – win southern votes owned great deal of Chicago real estate His idea: divide Nebraska territory into two territories and let Popular Sovereignty determine free/slave issue Douglas has influence in the Senate and is able to win support for this. It functionally shuts down the Missouri Compromise. Problems Leads to Bleeding Kansas
Bleeding Kansas (1854-1859) Pro-slave and free-soilers immigrate to Kansas New England Aid Society Missouri border ruffians Fierce struggle between the Lecompton Government (pro-slavery) and the Topeka Free Government Tremendous amount of vigilantism and bloodshed Sack of Lawrence Pottawatomie Creek Bleeding Kansas proved that popular sovereignty is not working in Kansas
Whigs are Dead • Southern Whigs form Constitutional Union party or become Know Nothings • Northern Whigs become free soilers or Republicans • Free soilers don’t last – too divided on all other issues • Know-Nothings don’t become a big party • Immigration decreases in 1850s • Slavery is clearly a bigger deal
Republican Party • Founded in Ripon, WI - 1854 • Kansas-Nebraska caused Abe Lincoln to go into politics and join the Republicans • Anti-slavery • Whiggish in economics – favored federal banks, internal improvements, promoting industry • Encouraged western settlement with land grants
Rise in political tension: Sumner & Brooks Spring 1856: Senator Charles Sumner (Mass) Incendiary remarks against Southerners; targeted Andrew Butler (SC) Preston Brooks – Southern Rep in the House Comes to Senate and beats Sumner unconscious with a cane on the Senate floor. Traumatic event and engages the national press Northerners argued that this is the type of violence that is produced from slavery This attitude makes it difficult to come to an agreement on sectional issues.
Ostend Manifesto • Expand South • Polk tried in 1848 to buy Spain • Filibusters Spanish consider offering emancipation to slaves on Cuba • Southerners feared emancipation so close to US • American diplomats meet in Ostend, Belgium • Suggest that Spain sell, otherwise possible invasion • Northern papers are tipped off and go crazy • Pierce administration renounced idea from pressure • K-N Act hurt Pierce’s popularity
The Dred Scott Story Slave of a military physician (John Emerson) - Missouri. In 1834 - moved to Illinois and territory of Wisconsin. In 1838, Scott returns to Missouri, resides with is owner until the owner dies Since slavery was illegal in territories north of the 36/30 parallel, sues in Missouri courts
The Dred Scott Decision, 1857 Missouri lower court (St. Louis County) ruled in his favor - 1850 Missouri State Supreme Court overturned the decision - 1852 Elevated to the Federal Supreme Court in 1856 Ruling: Southern Justices dominated the Supreme Court (5-4). Ruled 6-3 against Scott. Roger Taney (pronounced Tawney) Chief Justice said, Slaves don’t have a right to sue in a federal court Applied the full faith and credit clause Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because only states had the right to determine whether they want to be free or slave.
The Justices & Dred Scott • Supreme Court making policy??? • Five pro-southern justices • President James Buchanan influenced one Northern justice • Buchanan’s influenced was highly improper
Implications of Dred Scott Slave holders could in theory go anywhere they want in territories with their property (slaves) The decision makes the slavery issue worse Northerners outraged This is a blow to northern democratic supporters of popular sovereignty Southerners supported this decision but are upset with Northern reaction
Lecompton Constitution • Proslavery government writes a proslavery constitution for the state • Anti-slavery citizens boycott vote • Governor of Kansas implored Buchanan to reject the Constitution • Buchanan encouraged Congress to approve it • Stephan Douglas opposed it • Caused issues between the two • Congress rejected the Constitution - 1857
John Brown Religious fundamentalist and Abolitionist Believed that he had to do the work of God His mission was to eliminate slavery. He separated God’s law and the United States law Spoke in New England He raised money from Abolitionists Developed plan to raid the South Would cause a general uprising of slaves. Eventually that would lead to a war that would eliminate slavery
John Brown’s Raid, 1859 Oct 16th-18th at Harpers Ferry ,Va (now West Va) He recruited a 21 armed men and captured the federal arsenal hoping to incite a slave rebellion Virginia militia with some United States Marines (under Col. R.E. Lee) retake the armory wounding & killing several of Brown’s men. Brown is captured The slave uprising he had hoped for never happened
The Aftermath Most northerners saw this as the act of a madman The south feared that this was the first of many attacks What happened to Brown? Tried for treason and murder under Virginia State laws, not federal laws He was treated as a sane, deadly serious threat to the south and a murderer. Convicted and scheduled to be hung on Dec. 2nd 1859. It was widely covered by the press He rejected all attempts to free him, commute his sentence, or pardon him.
Public reaction North Brown was martyred by abolitionists in the north Ralph Waldo Emerson said “John Brown will make the gallows as glorious as Jesus made the Cross.” On the day of his execution, church bells tolled, cannons fired, sermons were preached South Sees his actions as treasonist One Southern Journal said “The North has sanctioned and applauded theft, murder and treason in the body of John Brown Lynchings increase South felt they were under siege from the North It further separated the two sections of the country This split the democratic party along sectional lines