1 / 9

WP 2 : Technology transfer in JI TETRIS PROJECT TEAM MEETING

WP 2 : Technology transfer in JI TETRIS PROJECT TEAM MEETING. Jin Lee, Research Associate Jake Schmidt, International Program Manager 21 June 2006, Amsterdam. JI Projects in the Pipeline. As of 17 January 2006:

zedekiah-louis
Download Presentation

WP 2 : Technology transfer in JI TETRIS PROJECT TEAM MEETING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP 2 : Technology transfer in JITETRIS PROJECT TEAM MEETING Jin Lee, Research Associate Jake Schmidt, International Program Manager 21 June 2006, Amsterdam

  2. JI Projects in the Pipeline • As of 17 January 2006: • 53 projects in pipeline for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia, & Ukraine • 8,401 ktCO2e per year • In the meantime : • 94 projects in pipeline for these countries • 11,743 ktCO2e per year • Analysis is slightly out of date, but still relevant to our study

  3. Decreasing data certainty Methodology: Technology Transfer in JI • Same criteria as WP5 on CDM: • Country origin of technology • Data origin: PDDs, contact with project developers • Possibilities: European Union, Host country, Other countries (Japan, USA, etc), No data • New or improved technology • Looking at current technologies used in host countries • Based on PDD, independent data on the country conditions • Capacity building or knowledge transfer • Based on PDD and expert judgment

  4. Technologies Used – Share of GHG Reductions

  5. Technologies Used - Number of Projects

  6. Technology Transfer: Origin of Technology

  7. Technology Transfer - New or Improved

  8. Technology Transfer: Capacity Building/Knowledge Transfer

  9. Conclusion • Majority of tech transfer from EU-25 countries; followed by US • Over one third of the projects use technology from EU • Relatively little technology transfer—both “hard” and “soft”—took place in biomass, fossil fuel switching, and geothermal JI projects. • More technology transfer—both “hard” and “soft”—took place in energy distribution, methane capture, N2O destruction, and fugitive emission utilization. • In only 32% of the projects, new or improved technology is used • Capacity building or knowledge transfer appears to have taken place in small share of the projects

More Related