1 / 16

Update on Z’-> τ τ -> τ jet+ τ jet analysis

Update on Z’-> τ τ -> τ jet+ τ jet analysis. Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir Singh(P.U.,India). Outline. Introduction. Work done. List of cuts. Low statistics problem. Scale factor determination.

zelda-rutledge
Download Presentation

Update on Z’-> τ τ -> τ jet+ τ jet analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on Z’->ττ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir Singh(P.U.,India) India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  2. Outline • Introduction. • Work done. • List of cuts. • Low statistics problem. • Scale factor determination. • Calculation of expected no. of events surviving at some luminosity using • the idea of factorization. • No. of events at 100pb-1 for signal and background. • Conclusions & future plans. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  3. Introduction • New heavy gauge bosons( Z’, W’ etc.) occur quite frequently in the extensions of Standard Model like • Superstring, Grand unified theories(GUTs), Extra dimensions etc. • LHC offers a very good opportunity to search for Z’ bosons at TeV mass scale even with reasonably • low luminosity in electron and muon final states and simultaneously final state involving τ-pair will • be searched for. • But tau final states are complicated --> more difficult. The reach from tau-pair will be slightly worse • for same luminosity but its still a highly desirable result. • The signal extraction over the QCD background seems possible because the τ’s from the Z’ are • expected to be highly boosted due to high Z’ mass and the QCD cross section decreases with the increase • in the Pt. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  4. Work done • Using CMSSW_3_1_6 at the moment. The signal samples(MZ’ = 500 GeV/c2) are • private production lying at FNAL : • /zprimeTauTau500_7TeV_STARTUP31X_V4_GEN-SIM-RAW/eluiggi- • zprime500TauTauReco-1eb7407c99912735250bc247a04c22ce/USER • Binned QCD dijet background MC samples are taken from official Summer09 • production : • /QCDDiJet_Pt20to30/Summer09-MC_31X_V3_7TeV-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • /QCDDiJet_Pt30to50/Summer09-MC_31X_V3_7TeV-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • Up to • /QCDDiJet_Pt3000to3500/Summer09-MC_31X_V3_7TeV-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • Presently I am studying the MC data and trying to devise a selection criteria that • can reduce the QCD dijet background to an acceptable level. There is nice • improvement over the previous results !! • The selection criteria is shown in the next slide. • Presenting work regularly in the CMS High Pt Tau Group’s weekly meetings. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  5. List of cuts • Skim criteria for QCD: • 1) Reconstructed PFTau with leading π or ɣ Pt > 5.0 GeV/c • 2) At least one tau pair with DR(τ1,τ2) > 0.7 • At analyzer level: • 1) |ητ1| & |ητ2 |< 2.1 2) τ crack cut (τ’s in the cracks are not considered). • 3) Ptτ1 & Ptτ2 > 15.0 GeV/c • Electron veto [ H3X3/Plead > 0.03, H3X3/P lead is the ratio of energy deposited in the HCAL 3X3 • cluster in R < 0.184 around ECAL impact point of leading track and the Lead track momentum , • tau lead track minimum hits = 10] • 5) Muon veto • 6) Lead track Pt of τ1 & τ2 > 5.0 GeV/c • 7) Tau isolation : isolation cone size = 0.5, (i) sum Pt max. of tracks =1.0 GeV/c • (ii) sum Pt max. of gammas =1.0 GeV/c, Pt threshold for tracks = 1.0 GeV/c, Pt threshold for • gammas = 1.5 GeV/c. • 8) 1 prong requirement. • 9) Opposite sign requirement i.e. q(τ1)*q(τ2) < 0 • 10) -1.0 < CosΔφ(τ1 , τ2 ) < -0.95 • 11) M(τ1 ,τ2 ) > 200 GeV/c2 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  6. Low statistics problem • The problem that arises while dealing with QCD MC samples is of low statistics(very • few events survived after all the cuts). • This problem can be tackled by using the idea of factorization. • For factorization some cuts/requirements have to be chosen that are uncorrelated or • least correlated to the each other as well as with other cuts after them in the normal • sequence of cuts. • For this purpose tau Isolation, opposite sign requirement & 1 prong requirement are • chosen as “Factorization Variables” as they seem to be the suitable candidates satisfying • above requirements. • The idea is to loosen the factorization variables so as to gain more statistics & then • apply a “Scale Factor” corresponding to each of the factorization variable set “Tight” to • the final calculations of the estimates at certain luminosity. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  7. Scale factor determination Events Analyzed = Ni Events Analyzed = Ni Apply all cuts with particular fact. variable set “tight” Apply all cuts with all fact. variables set “loose” There is one scale factor per factorization variable Events passing above cuts = Nfloose Events passing above cuts = Nftight Scale Factor = Nftight/Niloose N(L) = σ*L*Scale Factor*Nfloose /Ni India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  8. Nomenclature for factorization • Tau signal cone size = 0.07, Isolation cone size  0.5, • Pt threshold for tracks = 1.0 GeV/c , Pt threshold for gammas = 1.5 GeV/c • (a) Tight tracker isolation  sum Pt max. of all the tracks = 1.0 GeV/c • (b) Loose tracker isolation  sum Pt max. of all the tracks = 5.0 GeV/c • (c) Tight ECAL isolation  sum Pt max. of gammas = 1.0 GeV/c • (d) Loose ECAL isolation  sum Pt max. of gammas = 5.0 GeV/c • (e) Tight 1 Prong requirement  requires both τ’s to undergo 1 Prong decay. • (f) Loose 1 Prong requirement  No 1 Prong requirement on both τ’s. • (g) Tight OS requirement  opposite sign requirement on two τ’s. • (h) Loose OS requirement  No opposite sign requirement on two τ’s. • (i) All loose cuts  All factorization variables set loose + other cuts. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  9. Events survived at different selection levels India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  10. Calculation of N@L & ΔN@L • Scale factor corresponding to a particular factorization variable say tau tracker isolation in this case, is defined as the ratio of no. of events passing all cuts for the sample with tau tracker isolation set tight divided by the no. of events passing all cuts for the sample where all factorization variables are set loose. • N(L) is calculated as : • N(L) = cross section*B.R.*Luminosity*εfilter*εskim*εcum_loose* Scale Factor(i) • The uncertainty in N(L) is calculated as: • ΔN = W*εtotal_cum_loose*εfilter*sqrt[ (Δεcum_loose/εcum_loose )2+ (ΔS.F.(i)/S.F.(i))2 ] , • where, W = cross section*B.R.*Luminosity* Scale Factor(i), • εfilter = 1, εskim = No . of events left after skimming/Total no. of events before skimming, εcum_loose = No. of events left after all cuts with all fact. variables set loose/No. of events after the skimming, εtotal_cum_loose = No. of events passing all cuts with all factorization variables set loose/No. of events in the sample. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  11. N@100 pb-1 • Only lower Pt hat bins up to Pt hat 230 to 300 GeV/c are found to • contribute significantly. Details are given in the back up slides. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  12. Visible mass • Some more efforts needed to nail down the QCD background !! India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  13. Conclusions & Future plans • The results are quite improved over the previous ones!! • Next step is to discover some new cuts/requirements to reduce the QCD • background more to get better signal over background ratio. • Possible candidates are: • Pt asymmetry, Isolation cone size, Pt threshold of tracks & gammas, Leading • track Pt cut, impact parameter. • To study the other possible backgrounds once the QCD background is • hammered down to an appreciable S/B ratio. • To optimize the cuts for betterment of S/B ratio. • To analyze the LHC collision data. India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  14. Back Up India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  15. Pt hat bin 20 to 30 GeV/c Scale factor for Tight tracker isolation Scale Factor=0.07527 +- 0.02736 Scale Factor=0.05663 +- 0.008923 Scale Factor=0.03597 +- 0.01117 Scale Factor=0.04446 +- 0.003935 Scale Factor=0.04598 +- 0.01123 Scale Factor=0.05155 +- 0.01296 Scale Factor=0.05455 +- 0.01157 Scale Factor=0.08444 +- 0.01311 Scale Factor=0.07264 +- 0.01277 Scale Factor=0.06164 +- 0.0199 Scale Factor=0.05917 +- 0.01815 Scale Factor=0.0608 +- 0.01094 Scale Factor=0.08216 +- 0.0133 Scale Factor=0.07194 +- 0.02192 Scale Factor=0.08609 +- 0.01614 Scale Factor=0.1149 +- 0.02621 Scale Factor=0.07006 +- 0.02037 Scale Factor=0.109 +- 0.02495 Scale factor for Tight 1 Prong requirement Scale Factor=0.2258 +- 0.04336 Scale Factor=0.09985 +- 0.01157 Scale Factor=0.04676 +- 0.01266 Scale Factor=0.02077 +- 0.002723 Scale Factor=0.02011 +- 0.007526 Scale Factor=0.01031 +- 0.005921 Scale Factor=0.01039 +- 0.005168 Scale Factor=0.01333 +- 0.005407 Scale Factor=0.007264 +- 0.004179 Scale Factor=0.0137 +- 0.00962 Scale Factor=0.005917 +- 0.0059 Scale Factor=0.006289 +- 0.00362 Scale Factor=0.01408 +- 0.005709 Scale Factor=0.007194 +- 0.007168 Scale Factor=0.006623 +- 0.004667 Scale Factor=0 +- 0 Scale Factor=0 +- 0 Scale Factor=0.01923 +- 0.011 Scale factor for tight ECAL isolation Scale Factor=0.6452 +- 0.04961 Scale Factor=0.5469 +- 0.01922 Scale Factor=0.4496 +- 0.02984 Scale Factor=0.4111 +- 0.009393 Scale Factor=0.4195 +- 0.02645 Scale Factor=0.3505 +- 0.02797 Scale Factor=0.3844 +- 0.02479 Scale Factor=0.3267 +- 0.02211 Scale Factor=0.2809 +- 0.02211 Scale Factor=0.2671 +- 0.03662 Scale Factor=0.2663 +- 0.034 Scale Factor=0.2704 +- 0.02034 Scale Factor=0.2817 +- 0.02179 Scale Factor=0.223 +- 0.03531 Scale Factor=0.2384 +- 0.02452 Scale Factor=0.2432 +- 0.03527 Scale Factor=0.2484 +- 0.03448 Scale Factor=0.2436 +- 0.03437 Pt hat bin 3000 to 3500 GeV/c India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

  16. Pt hat bin 20 to 30 GeV/c Scale factor for Tight opposite sign requirement Scale Factor=0.4624 +- 0.0517 Scale Factor=0.5052 +- 0.0193 Scale Factor=0.4928 +- 0.02998 Scale Factor=0.5055 +- 0.009544 Scale Factor=0.5029 +- 0.0268 Scale Factor=0.4948 +- 0.02931 Scale Factor=0.4753 +- 0.02545 Scale Factor=0.5 +- 0.02357 Scale Factor=0.5448 +- 0.0245 Scale Factor=0.5205 +- 0.04135 Scale Factor=0.5089 +- 0.03846 Scale Factor=0.5451 +- 0.0228 Scale Factor=0.5023 +- 0.02422 Scale Factor=0.4892 +- 0.0424 Scale Factor=0.4834 +- 0.02876 Scale Factor=0.473 +- 0.04104 Scale Factor=0.5032 +- 0.0399 Scale Factor=0.4936 +- 0.04003 N@100ipb N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 300to380 = 0.126091 +- 0.0560588 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 380to470 = 0.0151465 +- 0.00924629 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 470to600 = 0.00590631 +- 0.00468418 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 600to800 = 0.000547898 +- 0.000563139 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 800to1000 = 8.25997e-05 +- 5.04538e-05 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 1000to1400 = 4.48505e-05 +- 2.0122e-05 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 1400to1800 = 4.14146e-07 +- 4.39461e-07 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 1800to2200 = 1.89291e-08 +- 1.40319e-08 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 2200to2600 = 0 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 2600to3000 = 0 N@100ipb for QCD Pt hat 3000to3500 = 1.05541e-14 +- 6.77639e-15 Pt hat bin 3000 to 3500 GeV/c India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai

More Related