1 / 28

Tae-Sun Park Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS) in collaboration with

More-effective EFT: Electroweak response functions of A=2,3,4. Tae-Sun Park Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS) in collaboration with Y.-H. Song , K. Kubodera, D.-P. Min, M. Rho L.E. Marcucci, R. Schiavilla, M. Viviani, A. Kievsky, S. Rosati.

zelda
Download Presentation

Tae-Sun Park Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS) in collaboration with

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. More-effective EFT: Electroweak response functions of A=2,3,4 Tae-Sun Park Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS) in collaboration with Y.-H. Song, K. Kubodera, D.-P. Min, M. Rho L.E. Marcucci, R. Schiavilla, M. Viviani, A. Kievsky, S. Rosati TSP et al., PRC67(’03)055206,nucl-th/0208055 Y.-H. Song and TSP, nucl-th/0311055 K. Kubodera and TSP, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. vol.54 (2004) KIAS-Hanyang 2004@KIAS

  2. J. Bahcall’s challenge: “... do not see any way at present to determine from experiment or first principle theoretical calculations a relevant, robust upper limit to the hep production cross section.” (hep-ex/0002018) hep: 3He + p !4He + e+ + e Q: Can EFT be a breakthrough ?

  3. hep history (S-factor in 10-23 MeV-b unit): Schemetic wave functions ’52 (Salpeter) 630 Single particle model ’67 (Werntz) 3.7 Symmetry group consideration ’73 (Werntz) 8.1 Better wave functions (P-wave) ’83 (Tegner) 425 D-state & MEC ’89 (Wolfs) 15.34.7 analogy to 3He+n ’91 (Wervelman) 57 3He+n with shell-model Modern wave functions ’91 (Carlson et al.) 1.3 VMC with Av14 ’92 (Schiavilla et al.) 1.4-3.1 VMC with Av28 (N+)  S0 = 2.3 (“standard value”) ’01 (MSVKRB) 9.64 CHH with Av18 (N+) + p-wave PRL84(’00)5959, PRC63(’00)015801

  4. What’s wrong with the hep ? • 1. Pseudo-orthogonality : • |4He' |  = |S4:most symmetric • |3He + p' |  = | S31:next-to-most symmetric • S4 | gA ii i | S31=0. : (Gamow-Teller) • h1B-LOi is difficult to evaluate : • We need realistic (not schematic) wave functions. • h1B-LOi is small : h1B-LOi»hMEC (N3LO)i • Meson-exchange current (MEC) plays an essential role. • 2. MEC is highly model-dependent, hsoft 1-exchangei =0(Ã a generic feature of GT operator).

  5. MEC in EFT (Heavy-baryon ChPT) • MEC= N2LO+N3LO +  (N2LO=0 for GT), • N3LO= (hard 1-exchange) + (r) ()ij • Long-range part (hard 1-exchange) is well-known. • The value of  is not fixed by symmetry, and should be determined either by QCD or by other experiments. • Once the value of  is fixed, no other uncertainty left.

  6. Nuclear matrix element in EFT M=hfEFT| OEFT |iEFTi • |EFTi is yet to come ! • Schematic wave functions are not good. • A few accurate phenomenological wave functions available. • How we can go further ?

  7. We are thus forced to look at the possibility to study M=hfphen| OEFT | ipheni • Can it work ?

  8. How we do with  ? • Model-dependence  cut-off dependence: M()=hf | O() | ii = Mnon-CT () + () hf | (r) | ii . • Model-dependence resides in short-range, which we explore in terms of . • Consider another known process which depends on  : M0exp =M0non-CT () + () h0f | (r) | 0ii . This step determines the value of  for a given  and a. •  have strong dependence on , but independent of the details (quantum numbers, A, Z, ...) of the process.

  9. RG-invariance •  M()= hf | O() | ii = 0 ? • O(’) = O() + c0(r) + c2r2(r) +  , thus equivalent (up to N3LO) to replace ()!(’) = () + c0, which has no effect in matrix elements. We will check the RG-inv. numerically.

  10. Model-invariance ? • M(a)= hf(a) | O | i(a)i : a-independent ? • (a: model-index) • Vlow-k: if we limit our model space to k < , then all the accurate phenomenological potentials are equivalent. Hlow-k = U(a)y H(a) U(a) is a-independent, |(a)i = U(a) |low-ki M(a)= hlow-k | Uy(a)O U(a)| low-ki = hlow-k | O(a) | low-ki We also expect O(a) = Olow-k() + d0(r) + d2r2(r) + , since the finite range-part is dictated by the chiral symmetry.

  11. Contents • Brief review on heavy-baryon chiral perturbation theory • CT contributions to the currents at N3LO • Results: • isoscalar M1 (M1S) in n+p! d+ • pp (p+p ! d + e+ + e) • hep (3He + p !4He + e+ + e) • hen (3He + n !4He + ) • Discussions

  12. Heavy-baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory 1. Pertinent degrees of freedom: pions and nucleons. Others are integrated out. Their effects appear as higher order operators of p’s and N’s. 2. Expansion parameter = Q/LcQ : typical momentum scaleand/orm,Lc : mNand/or4p fp3. Weinberg’s power counting rule for irreducible diagrams.

  13. CT contributions to the currents at N3LO • g4S : isoscalar M1 • d, spin observables(np! d+), (3He)+(3H), hen,... • g4V : isovector M1 • (np! d+), (3He)-(3H), hen,... • pp, hep, tritium-b decay (TBD), m-d capture, n-d scattering, … .

  14. Isoscalar M1 (M1S) inn+p! d+ • Due to pseudo-orthogonality, 1B-LO is highly suppressed, NLO=N2LO=0. • At N3LO, there appear CT (g4S ) and 1-exchange. • The value of g4S is determined from the exp. value of d. • Aspects of the actual calculation: • Argonne v18 wave functions. • Hardcore regularization, (3)(r) !(r-rC)/(4 r2), rC» 1/ . • Up to N3LO and up to N4LO. • No experimerimetal data yet: it can be in principle measured via the spin observables, but requires ultra-high polarizations. TSP, K. Kubodera, D.-P. Min & M. Rho, PLB472(’00)232

  15. Results(M2B/M1B) of M1S, up to N3LO cf) J.-W. Chen, G. Rupak & M. Savage, PLB464(’99)1

  16. Results(M2B/M1B) of M1S, up to N4LO

  17. pp process • 1B-LO is not suppressed, NLO=N2LO=0. LO À N3LO. • Most solar neutrinos are due to pp process. • At N3LO, there appear CT ( ) and 1-exchange. • The value of is determined from exp. value of TBD rate. • Bridging different A sector, A=2 $ A=3. • Aspects of the actual calculation: • CHH method with Argonne v18 + Urbana X. • Gaussian regularization, exp(-q2/2) • No experimerimetal data yet: Coulomb repulsion makes it difficult at low-energy. TSP, L. Marcucci,..., PRC67:055206,2003, nucl-th/0106025

  18. Results(M2B/M1B) of the pp process

  19. hep process • 1B-LO is strongly suppressed, NLO=N2LO=0. LO » N3LO. • Highest-E solar neutrinos are due to hep process. • At N3LO, there appear CT ( ) and 1-exchange. • The value of is determined from exp. value of TBD rate. • Bridging different A sector, A=3 $ A=4. • Aspects of the actual calculation: • CHH method with Argonne v18 + Urbana X. • Gaussian regularization, exp(-q2/2) • No experimerimetal data yet: Coulomb repulsion makes it difficult at low-energy. • Required accuracy: order of magnitude. TSP, L. Marcucci,..., PRC67(’03)055206, nucl-th/0107012 K. Kubodera & TSP, Ann. Rev. N&P Sci. vol.54, ’04

  20. Results(M2B/M1B) of the hep process

  21. hepS-factorin10-23 MeV-barn: • Shep(theory)=(8.6  1.3) • hepneutrino flux in 103 cm-2 s-1 : • fhep(theory) = (8.4  1.3) • fhep(experiment) < 40 • Super-Kamiokande data, hep-ex/0103033

  22. The hen (3He + n  4He + ) process • Accurate experimental data are available for the hen • The hen process has much in common with hep : • The leading order 1B contribution is strongly suppressed due to pseudo-orthogonality. • A cancellation mechanism between 1B and 2B occurs. • Trivial point: both are 4-body processes that involve 3He + N !4He. Q: Can we test our hep prediction by applying the same method to the hen process ? Y.-H. Song & TSP, nucl-th/0311055

  23. Results(M2B/M1B) of the hen process

  24. hen history s(exp)= (55 ±3) mb, (54 ± 6) mb 2-14 mb : (1981) Towner & Kanna 50 mb : (1991) Wervelman (112, 140)mb : (1990) Carlson et al ( 86, 112)mb : (1992) Schiavilla et al s(our work)= ??(See Young-Ho Song’s talk)

  25. Discussions • Developed an EFT method which enables us to do a systematic and consistent EFT calculation on top of accurate but phenomenological wave functions. • Confirmed the RG-invariance numerically to a very satisfactory degree. • Also demonstrated the convergence of chiral expansion in the isoscalar M1 channel of the np! d, check for other proceeses are future works. • For all the cases we have studied, our method works quite well • extremely high accuracy in 2-body processes, • the first accurate & reliable theory prediction for the hep and hen, • -d (S. Ando etal., PLB555(’03)49), -d (S.Nakamura etal, NPA707 (’02)561,NPA721(’03)549)

  26. Compared to Hybrid model approaches: (Chemtob-Rho type of current-algebra based phenomenological current operators + phen. wave functions) • systematic & consistent expansion scheme • full control on the short-range physics • ,,, • Compared to Pure EFT approaches: • more flexible and more powerful • ... ! so, we are calling our method as More-effective effective field theory (MEEFT)

  27. Invitation for dinner Those who have not taken dinner last night with Prof. Rho are invited for dinner tonight !

More Related