190 likes | 459 Views
Don Mitchell, FNAL. 3.9 GHz Cryomodule for DESY. Don Mitchell, FNAL. 3.9 GHz Cryomodule Design. Design effort currently on cavity processing and testing fixtures.Effort will then focus on completing the following design details: helium vessel, bladetuner, magnetic shields, and misc. coldmass components; all of which are at the 90% - 95% level of completion.
E N D
1. Design Status of Fermilab SRF Cryomodules 3.9 GHz (for DESY)
&
TTF III+ (kit from DESY)
&
FNAL Generation III+
&
ILC T4CM
Don Mitchell, FNAL
January 11, 2006
2. Don Mitchell, FNAL 3.9 GHz Cryomodule for DESY
3. Don Mitchell, FNAL 3.9 GHz Cryomodule Design Design effort currently on cavity processing and testing fixtures.
Effort will then focus on completing the following design details: helium vessel, bladetuner, magnetic shields, and misc. coldmass components; all of which are at the 90% - 95% level of completion
4. Don Mitchell, FNAL TTF III+ is our design referencefor ALL 1.3 GHz Cryomodules
5. Don Mitchell, FNAL TTF III+ Cryomodule
6. Don Mitchell, FNAL Americanized TTF III+ Cryomodule
7. Don Mitchell, FNAL Americanized TTF III+ (cont.) Work has begun on:
Cryostat Vessel
Cavity
Helium Vessel
Main Couplers
8. Don Mitchell, FNAL ILC Design Considerations Move quad package to middle of cryomodule to achieve better support and alignment.
Shorten cavity-to-cavity interconnect and simplify for ease of fabrication and cost reduction. Possible superconducting joint.
Minimize direct heat load to cavity through MC.
Simplify the assembly procedure.
MLI redesign to reduce hands-on labor costs.
More robust to survive shipping.
Reliability of tuner motors in cold operation.
Etc. (we’ve heard many suggestions)
9. Don Mitchell, FNAL
10. Don Mitchell, FNAL ILC Generation 4 (not the final ILC design) Small changes to address major concerns.
Magnet alignment and vibration issues.
Cryomodule with and without magnet pkg.
Possible option for separate magnet cryovessel
11. Don Mitchell, FNAL
12. Don Mitchell, FNAL
13. Don Mitchell, FNAL T4CM Proposed Cavity w/ Bladetuner
14. Don Mitchell, FNAL
15. Don Mitchell, FNAL
16. Don Mitchell, FNAL Proposed 4th Generation Design 2 Vessels, ? 1293.8 mm in length (w & w/o Magnet package)
Cavity string supported and aligned by 3 support posts.
Magnet independently aligned but still supported from the 300mm HGR pipe. (HGR Pipe may need to be resized)
Support post locations may be identical in both vessels to simplify the tooling.
HOM absorber in interconnect region.
Smaller cav-to-cav connection (71.8mm)
BPM, Quad magnet, and steering magnets are combined into onemagnet package. Total length currently assumed to be 1222 mm.
TTF III cavity utilizes short end-tube for both ends. Length reduced by 37mm.
Possible use of Bladetuner due to the shortened cavity length.
New Magnetic Shield design.
All ports and flanges will be metric and ISO style.
17. Don Mitchell, FNAL T4CM will differ from Type III+ in the following general areas Cavity iris-to-iris spacing reduced to 283 mm
Reduces length from 12.20 to about 11.8 m, get ~0.75 packing (but increased magnet length negates this save in overall length, in fact, making T4CM 356.4 mm longer)
Slow tuner modified to allow closer cavity-to-cavity spacing (could mean switching to bladetuner design, but choice still open)
Fast tuner -- new design
Quad/corrector/BPM package under center post, hung from 300 mm tube, not on rollers (diverging from X-FEL)
Two major module types, one with quad and one without
18. Don Mitchell, FNAL More differences of T4CMfrom Type III+ Interconnect features modified to accommodate input coupler at end of cryostat.
Quad current leads may be new, with local impact on thermal shields and vacuum vessel ports. May need access ports as well.
Provisions for quad power lead connection at center of module.
Some pipe sizes will be increased for lower pressure drops with high flow rates -- would like to retain long cryogenic unit lengths up to limit of 300 mm pipe and cryo plants. Present effort includes re-analysis of heat loads, flow rates, and cryogenic system thermal process.
19. Don Mitchell, FNAL Some critical open design issues Quad/corrector/BPM package is a major unknown right now and goes into the heart of the module
Tuner details, slow and fast, but especially fast tuner
Vibrational analysis, which will be compared to measurements for verification of the model for future design work
Development of module and module component test plans
Verification of cavity positional stability with thermal cycles
Design of test instrumentation for the module
Robustness for shipping, analysis of shipping restraints and loads, shipping specifications
Active quad movers(?) A complication
20. Don Mitchell, FNAL Probable Design Schedule 3.9 GHz Cryomodule Design Completion: 2nd QTR 06
BCP fixture processing currently underway
Small design modifications needed to cryomodule components
Drawings must be checked, approved, and released
Few resources available at this time
Americanized CRYO III+
3 to 4 months of detail drawings Feb – May ’06
~ 3 detailers and 1 engineer
ILC T4CM
12 - 24 months (2006 - 2007)
1st international meeting in January 2006, CERN
Assign responsibilities (FNAL to possibly take lead)
Engineering issues must be primary focus
Magnet/BPM package (internal or external to cryomodule)
Vibration issues
Tuners, etc.
Integrate into module design
Designers will get involved once engineering issues are solved