540 likes | 699 Views
Chapter 4: Brain evolution. Frederick L. Coolidge & Thomas Wynn. How Brains Evolve. The Role of Genes. What are genes? Genes are the blueprints controlling the morphology and physiology of organisms. Genes are composed of DNA sequences
E N D
Chapter 4: Brain evolution Frederick L. Coolidge & Thomas Wynn
How Brains Evolve The Role of Genes • What are genes? • Genes are the blueprints controlling the morphology and physiology of organisms. • Genes are composed of DNA sequences • These DNA sequences code for the production of amino acids • Amino acids combine to form proteins • Until recently, phenotypic trait expression was thought to be the result of one or more genes working together.
How Brains Evolve The Human Genome Project • The “human genome project” has demonstrated that humans possess drastically less genes than scientists expected • Scientists originally estimated that the human genome must consist of hundreds of thousands of individual genes • In actuality, researchers found that humans possess somewhere between 20,000 to 25,000 • Scientists originally overestimated the number of genes due to a misunderstanding of the way in which genes operate
How Brains Evolve The Role of Genes • Genes serve more functions than originally assumed • Structural genes • Directly control trait expression through amino-acid specific coding • “Re-edit” genes • Change the sequence of base pairs • Regulatory genes • Control the order and timing in which other genes are activated or deactivated • E.g., BF-1 – cell divisions in cortical neuron development
How Brains Evolve The Chimpanzee Genome Project • The chimpanzee genome has revealed a 95-99% genetic similarity between human and chimpanzee DNA. • So then why are the two phenotypically so different – in both anatomy and behavior? • The inability for the current understanding of DNA to explain the clear differences in phenotypic expression has led to the development of a new field of research: • Epigenetics
How Brains Evolve The Role of Experience • Environment also plays a role in the development of brains and cognition • Two developmental periods • Pre-natal • Post-natal
How Brains Evolve Pre-natal Environment • Changes in the uterine environment can affect the sequence and rate of development • Fetus hormonal environment • E.g., Androgens produced during male development • Maternal experience • Diet and toxins • Level of stress • Personal experience • Birth • Often includes several minutes of oxygen deprivation
How Brains Evolve Post-natal Environment • After birth, the brain continues to develop more neurons and connections between neurons • Apoptosis • Programmed cell death • Pattern determined by experiences of newborn • The brain is a plastic organ that learns in response to experience • Synaptic pruning • Reduction in the number of overproduced or weak neuronal connections
How Brains Evolve Post-natal Environment • Consistent and heavily “exercised” portions of the brain are awarded more neurons and axons • Effect of mental exercise is greater in children than adults • Environment and experience can only influence brain development within the limits set by genes • E.g., language learning in infant bonoboKanzi • Developed ability to understand human speech • Unable to produce syntactical constructions using more than 4 symbols
How Brains Evolve The Role of Natural Selection • Natural selection is the primary mechanism of evolutionary change. • Differential reproduction • Individuals who reproduce successfully pass more genes on to the next generation than those who do not. • Natural selection increases or decreases the frequency of genes that already exist. • It cannot create change without novel material that provides an evolutionary advantage
How Brains Evolve Mutation • Changes in the chemical make-up of a gene (DNA) that produce small effects on anatomy and physiology • This is caused by: • Toxins • Natural or artificial radiation • Errors during duplication and cell division • Mutations are only rarely “good” • Most mutations are either bad or neutral • They are such a common occurrence that good results occur often enough by chance
How Brains Evolve Effects of Mutations • Regulatory genes • Small mutations in regulatory genes can produce dramatic changes in anatomy • Structural genes • Gene duplication • The sequence of base pairs is duplicated, doubling the DNA length • Duplicated anatomical structures form that can serve new functions • If any small change yields a reproductive advantage its frequency will rapidly increase. Gene Duplication
How Brains Evolve Heritability Revisited: Epigenetics • A new field of behavioral genetics that recognizes that not all methods of heritability involve traditional DNA models • Previous models were restricted to • Single dominant/recessive genes • Single regulatory genes • Additive genetic patterns • Definition by Bird (2007) • The structural adaptation of chromosomal regions so as to register, signal, or perpetuate altered activity states
How Brains Evolve Heritability Revisited: Epigenetics • Epigenetics recognizes that phenotype changes across generations can result from: • RNA • Chromatin • “Junk” DNA • Interactions among DNA strands • Still unrecognized methods of heritability
How Brains Evolve Heritability Revisited: Epigenetics • Researchers began studying non-DNA methods of heritability to figure out why monozygotic twins do not always have identical vulnerability to genetic illnesses. • Pembrey et al. (2006) • Transgenerational epigenetic heritability • The enhanced working memory capacity that led to the development of modern executive functions could be the result of a neural mutation or an epigenetic event.
Evolutionary Psychology • Evolutionary psychology focuses on the role that natural selection played in determining specific features of human cognition. • Human cognition is seen as “massively modular” • Consisting of a large number of specific abilities that have evolved to solve specific evolutionary problems. • E.g., Space constancy (Silverman et al., 2000) • Evolved to solve problems in wayfinding when hunting
Evolutionary Psychology • Research and theory are based on the assumption that our minds evolved long ago in conditions very different from those in the modern world. • Important features used to study the evolution of cognitive abilities • 1. The target ability is narrowly circumscribed • 2. Natural selection is the only mechanism invoked • 3. The evolutionary reasoning is based on “reverse engineering”
The Role of Constraint • Natural selection can only work on pre-existing variation • Because of the incremental nature of this variation, the existing structures and behaviors of an organism constrain the possible solutions to an adaptive problem. • Nature rarely starts from scratch • It is far easier, and far more cost-effective, to tweak the extant system. • E.g., Vertebrate land adaptation • Mutations of older genes that control more fundamental structures and functions would not be able to produce a viable offspring.
The Role of Constraint • Exaptation • When faced with adaptive problems, existing structures commonly evolve new functions • E.g., feathers – from thermal regulation to flight • Exaptation has been responsible for many changes in the evolution of the human brain and cognition • Brain exaptation • E.g., Hippocampus – from spatial orientation and navigation to declarative memory formation • Cognitive exaptation • E.g., Facial recognition – from mate recognition and assessment to complex social communication
The Metabolic Trade-off • Neural tissue is very “expensive” to maintain • Requires large numbers of calories • Every increase in the quantity of neurons will have a metabolic cost • In order for a brain to evolve in size, the organism must either: • Decrease the caloric demands of some other tissue • Evolve a way to acquire calories more efficiently • E.g., Trade-off between brain size and digestion • Brains must provide selective advantages to evolve beyond the minimum size and organization necessary for the organism’s continued success.
Summary • Within structural and metabolic constraints, natural selection and mutation have shaped the vertebrate brain into a remarkably complex organ. • We now know that brain and cognitive evolution need not have been long, slow, gradual processes. • Natural selection is still the primary agent of change, but the complex interrelationship between structural and regulatory genes yields long-term patterns that are anything but simple.
Methods of Study Methods for Studying Evolution • 1. The comparative method • 2. Paleontology • 3. Archeology • 4. Reverse engineering
Methods of Study The Comparative Method • The comparative method uses similarities and differences between living organisms to reconstruct the sequences of divergence in evolutionary history. • E.g., What is the sequence of evolutionary divergence of a dog, a lion, a horse, and a penguin?
Evolutionary Tree of Divergence Dog Lion Horse Therapsid Diapsid Penguin Ichtheostega
Methods of Study Homologous and Analogous Characteristics • Organisms can resemble one another for two very different reasons: • Homologies • They have a common ancestor from whom they inherited their similarities • Analogies (Homoplasies) • They have adapted over time to doing similar things in similar environments • It is usually possible to identify differences in basic anatomy that prevent us from mistaking analogies for homologies. • Comparative DNA has become the most important tool for identifying homologous relationships
Methods of Study Ancestral and Derived Characteristics • Comparison of “ancestral” and “derived” characteristics can give us a much clearer understanding of divergence • Ancestral characteristics • Shared by all members of a group with a common ancestor • Derived characteristics • Differentiate a sub-group from members of an ancestral group • These are relative terms, and their reference varies according to the level of specificity of the question. • E.g., Mammals, primates, humans and the neocortex
…because all primates are mammals. The neocortex is an “ancestral” characteristic.
The expanded visual cortex is a “derived” characteristic.
…because all humans are primates. The expanded visual cortex is now an “ancestral” characteristic.
The ability of the human hippocampus to form declarative memories is a “derived” characteristic.
Methods of Study Ancestral and Derived Characteristics • When neuroscientists compare the brains of closely related forms, there are usually few obvious differences in gross anatomy • There are often variations in neural functioning due to much less visible neuroanatomical differences • The principles of “ancestral” and “derived” characteristics can also be applied to the evolved functions of cognitive abilities • Derived traits • Explained by circumstances that our ancestors encountered after the split from apes • Ancestral traits • First identify which common ancestor evolved the ability • Explained by circumstances that our common ancestors encountered
Methods of Study The Comparative Method • Comparative evidence allows us to frame evolutionary questions correctly. • E.g., Why, in an evolutionary sense, can humans follow the gaze of another individual? • An ancestral ability of all anthropoids that evolved as an aid for solving complex social problems. • The comparative method is useful to identify unique and shared characteristics. • To better understand how and why these features evolved, it is important to consider evidence from other methods of study.
Methods of Study Paleontology • Paleontology is the study of prehistoric life, including organisms’ evolution and interaction with each other and their environments. • Paleontologists identify and interpret fossils. • They strive to reconstruct the environment in which an organism lived through analysis of sediment, and the identification of other fossilized animals and plants
Methods of Study Fossils • The fossil record • Hard body parts are more likely to fossilize • Soft body parts have usually been consumed or decayed long before burial • The soft-tissue of brains do not fossilize very often, but skulls and crania do. • These fossils are used to measure brain size • Natural sedimentary casts • Filling the reconstructed cranium • Endocasts
Methods of Study Brain Size • The most commonly used measure of brain difference in evolutionary science is brain size. • Animals with large brains exhibit more complex behaviors than those with small brains • Brain size is easy to measure using brain weights, imaging techniques, and endocranial volume. • Brain size in vertebrates is correlated to body size. • Meeting the demands of a larger body requires a larger brain • Larger brains do not necessarily indicate more intelligence
Methods of Study Brain Size • When comparing the brain sizes of two animals, we must also know their body size. • It is difficult to compare fossils of terrestrial vertebrates for two reasons: • Lack of tissue – muscles, organs, etc. • Finding complete skeletons is rare • Paleontologists must calculate body size relative to living organisms • Allometric relationships further complicate brain measurements. • Body size increases faster than brain size • Smaller organisms have larger relative brain sizes
Methods of Study Brain/Body Size Relation • There is a direct and predictable relationship between brain size and body size. • It can be described mathematically or graphically • Y = kXa • Y = Brain weight • X = Body weight • k = “Scaling” constant • a = Exponent describes the slope of regression line
Brain/Body Size Relationship:Mammals • The solid regression line represents predicted brain size for body size • Mammals that fall above the regression line are typically more encephalized
Brain/Body Size Relationship:Vertebrates • Mammals fall around a regression line that is farther up on the y-axis. • They tend to be more encephalized than fish, reptiles, and birds. • Mammals experienced an increase in brain power for two reasons: • Internal body temperature regulation requires neurological resources • Reliance on learned behavior rather than programmed instinctual responses
Methods of Study Encephalization Quotient • The Encephalization Quotient (EQ) is the primary way in which brain size is compared • EQ tells us the difference between actual and predicted size • Any size increase beyond predicted values should reflect excess capacity not devoted to regulating basic metabolic functions • EQ is most useful at the general taxonomic level • It does not take into account different reasons for encephalization • E.g., Humans and dolphins
Methods of Study Endocasts • An endocast is a liquid latex cast of a reconstructed cranium • Reflects external brain features impressed on the cranial bone • Gross features of brain anatomy are usually preserved. • E.g., Overall size/shape, lateral fissure, and the major lobes • Less pronounced features are often impossible to detect reliably. • E.g., Gyri and sulci
Methods of Study Evidence from Endocasts • Paleoneurologists focus on two types of evidence from endocasts: • 1. The overall shape of the brain • Height, length, breadth, arcs, and chords • Reflect an animal’s way of life • Comparing at the higher taxonomic levels • 2. Locations of specific surface features of brain anatomy • Gyri and sulci location • Can help trace evolutionary expansion • Comparing at the lower taxonomic levels
Endocasts • Endocasts can help identify some important differences between humans and our ancestors. • Asymmetries in overall shape • Enlarged left occipital lobe • Expanded right frontal lobe • Locations of specific surface features • Lunate sulcus • Marks boundary between • Parietal lobes • Occipital lobes • Expanded parietal lobes
Methods of Study Brain Size and Endocasts • Brain size and endocasts as evidence for cognitive evolution: • Useful at the higher taxonomic levels of analysis of neurological evolution • Reveal little information when studying the evolution of brains within a single subfamily • E.g., hominins.
Methods of Study Archeology • Archeologists study traces and patterns in material evidence that exist in the present in order to reconstruct actions and behaviors that occurred in the past. • E.g., Stone tools, pottery, burial goods, etc. • Cognitive archeologists are interested in the development of cognition on an evolutionary scale. • Actions are guided by cognition • The traces of action preserve something of the underlying cognition.
Methods of Study Archeology’s Material Bias • Not all actions leave tangible traces, and only a limited range of traces survive for more than a brief period of time. • Archeologists tend to rely heavily on those activities that preserve well, giving archeology a material bias. • From garbage and stone tools archeologists reconstruct subsistence • Tools - the sequence of actions used to create them • Garbage - methods of food processing and disposal • Material evidence also provides insight into symbolic and social behavior • Exotic beads/shells indicate long-distance trade • Cave paintings suggest advances in working memory
Methods of Study Visible Patterns of Cognition • Cognitive science is rich in interpretive concepts developed to explain features of human cognition. • Archeologists must take cognitive concepts and identify the visible consequences. • E.g., Working memory and cave paintings • Archeologists can only identify the minimum competence necessary to produce the patterns they study. • Features of modern cognition suggest certain evolutionary developments and scenarios. • Without actual evidence from the past these scenarios remain hypotheses
Methods of Study Reverse Engineering • Analyzes the form and structure of an object in order to discover its function. • Evolutionary psychologists • 1. Start with a comprehensive description of the structure of cognition • 2. Identify what the cognition is designed to do • 3. Use this insight to describe how/why it evolved • E.g., Bus (2003) – examined male preference for certain female body proportions • 1. Established male preference was not culturally determined • 2. Human male perceptual system is sensitive to these proportions • 3. Perceptual sensitivity functions to detect reproductive potential