1 / 23

Energy Poverty in Japan

32 nd USAEE/IAEE North American Conference. Energy Poverty in Japan. How does the energy price escalation affect low income and vulnerable households?. Shinichiro OKUSHIMA * and Azusa OKAGAWA # * University of Tsukuba # National Institute for Environmental Studies. Contents.

zephr-fry
Download Presentation

Energy Poverty in Japan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 32nd USAEE/IAEE North American Conference Energy Poverty in Japan How does the energy price escalation affect low income and vulnerable households? Shinichiro OKUSHIMA * and Azusa OKAGAWA # * University of Tsukuba #National Institute for Environmental Studies

  2. Contents • Introduction • Motivation • Energy poverty • Concept and definition • Methodology • Model and microdata • Results • Energy price escalation • Energy price escalation & countermeasure • Conclusion

  3. Introduction: motivation • Increasing concern about energy/fuel poverty in Japan • Energy costs are soaring • More dependent on fossil fuel imports after the Fukushima accident • Introduction of a feed-in tariff scheme • A new tax on fossil fuels (a carbon tax) in October 2012 • Raising the consumption tax twice by 2015 • A weak yen, etc. • Share of low-income households is increasing • Reflecting Japan’s aging and sluggish economy since the 1990s • Deteriorating job quality • Vulnerable households (e.g., lone-parent-with-dependent children, elderly, and single-person households) are also increasing Energy poverty could be an important political issue in Japan

  4. Introduction: motivation • This study examines the energy poverty issues in Japan by • the applied / computable general equilibrium model • the microdata on the Japanese household • This study analyzes • the impact on households when energy prices are doubled • the effectiveness of an alleviation policy (a kind of social tariffs) • This study empirically shows • the severe impacts especially on low-income or vulnerable households • An alleviation policy will be effective when the energy price escalation goes forward in the future

  5. Energy poverty: concept and definition • To date, much less attention has been given to the energy poverty problem in developed countries compared with developing countries • The lack of access to modern types of energy (e.g., electricity) is the focal point in the context of energy poverty in developing countries (e.g., IEA, 2010) • Only a few studies for developed countries except the UK • In the UK, since Boardman’s (1991) seminal work, several studies have been made • Various reports are published by the UK government such as the Hills fuel poverty review (2011, 2012) • The recent literature on the UK; e.g., Chawla and Pollitt (2013), Moore (2012), and Waddams Price et al. (2012) • However, no research has been found that examined the energy poverty problem in Japan in detail

  6. Energy poverty: concept and definition • Energy poverty can be defined conceptually as • the condition of lacking the resources necessary to meet their basic energy needs • A similar definition by Bouzarovski et al. (2012) • the condition wherein a household is unable to access energy services at the home up to a socially and materially necessitated level • In developed countries like Japan, broader issues that prevent people from satisfying their basic energy needs should be the focus of the energy poverty problem

  7. Energy poverty: concept and definition • Energy poverty can be measured practically by the two steps like the general income poverty measurement (Sen, 1979) • “Identification”- who are the poor? • “Aggregation” - how are the poverty characteristics of different people to be combined into an aggregate measure? • For simplicity, this study defines energy poverty households as those that spend more than 10% of their income on energy expenses (electricity, gas, and heating oil) • “Identification” (poverty line) – energy budget share, 10% • “Aggregation” - identifying the extent of poverty in the society simply with the proportion of the “poor” to the total population Energy poverty:

  8. Energy poverty: concept and definition • The definition is similar to the UK government’s one • However, the energy expenses in this study are actual ones based on our microdata, rather than the calculated ones like the UK. • Identification (setting the poverty line) and aggregation are controversial but necessary tasks • Energy budget shares have often been used for the poverty lines (Pachauri et al., 2004). • However, this simple “10% ratio” measure has various problems, e.g., it pays no attention to the “depth” of poverty • the “10% ratio” measure evaluates the marginally poor as the same as the miserably poor • Future research is needed for the definition

  9. Methodology: an applied/computable GE model • Many studies point out that economic impacts cannot be evaluated correctly without using general equilibrium models (e.g., Hazilla and Kopp, 1990) • Hence, this study develops an applied/computable general equilibrium model with multihouseholds characterized by their income levels on the Japanese economy • The model is composed of 10 households, 40 industries, a government and 48 commodities (9 fossil fuels) • The model’s parameters are calibrated to the 2005 base year social accounting matrix (SAM) • the data sources: the most recent 2005 Input–Output Tables, the 2005 Family Income and Expenditure Survey, etc.

  10. Methodology: an applied/computable GE model The model is composed with 40 industries and 48 commodities, nine of which are fossil fuels

  11. Methodology: an applied/computable GE model X IX Higher income VIII VII V VI IV III II I Lower income The model has 10 household groups characterized by income bracket

  12. Methodology: an applied/computable GE model Output 0 0 Transport and retail margin 1 Intermediate goods (Armington goods) Utility 0.5 Labor 0.1 Energy composite goods Capital Armington goods 0.1 0.5 Electricity Fossil fuels (Armington goods)

  13. Methodology: an applied/computable GE model Supply side Industry Import Intermediate goods Import goods Labor Capital Goods market Labor market Capital market Export Government Investment Export Households Demand side

  14. Methodology: Applied/computable GE model to microdata • This study links the simulation results given by the AGE model to the detailed information on individual households provided by the microdata Applied/computable GE model Evaluating the impacts of energy price escalation on households by income decile groups Linked Microdata (provided by the National Statistics Center for our research purpose) A sample of about 50,000 households, covering the whole of Japan The dataset is created from the anonymized data based on the 2004 National Survey of Family Income and Expenditure Performing a detained analysis of the impact on low-income and vulnerable households like mother-child, single-aged, etc.

  15. Results: when energy prices are doubled (Scenario 1) X • This study first analyzes the impact on households when energy prices are doubled IX VIII VII V VI IV Energy prices doubled Scenario 1 III II I • In the scenario, electricity prices for households are doubled compared with those in the base case (BaU) • Electricity price escalation is caused by the change of power supply composition from nuclear to thermal (oil and LNG), as well as rises in the import prices of fossil fuels • Together with the electricity price hike, all kinds of energy are appreciated in the simulation • The scenario and assumptions are in line with the scenarios in the governmental reports (e.g., Energy and Environmental Council (2012a, 2012b))

  16. Results: Changes in household income & energy consumption • The table indicates the changes in household income, energy consumption, and energy consumption ratios (energy budget shares) by income group • The changes in the energy consumption ratios (energy expenses / income) are larger for the lower income groups. • The results clearly indicate that the impacts of the energy price escalation are regressive. Changes in household income, energy consumption & energy consumption ratio (compared with BaU, %)

  17. Results: the proportion of energy poverty households by income decile group (Scenario1) • This study combines the simulation results with the detailed information on individual households by the microdata. • The result shows the severe impact on low-income households, especially the lowest income decile group when energy prices are escalated. 23% to 42% 2% to 10%

  18. Results: the impact by household type (Scenario 1) • From the result, mother–child households and single-aged households can be categorized as vulnerable to the energy price escalation. • About one-tenth of mother–child and single-aged households are in energy poverty even in the BaU. The poverty rates are almost doubled by the energy price escalation. 11% to 23% 12% to 22%

  19. Policy scenario (Scenario 2) X According to the results, there are sure signs of energy poverty in lower income groups, as well as vulnerable households IX VIII VII V VI IV III Scenario 2 II I With the policy: Subsidizing the energy costs of low-income households (I & II) Subsidy totaling 500 billion yen (5 billion dollars) This policy can be interpreted as a kind of social tariffs, i.e., it involves discounted energy prices for low-income households Social tariffs were introduced in the UK from 2008 to 2011

  20. Results: the proportion of energy poverty households by income decile group (Scenario 2) • The policy offsets the negative impacts of energy price escalation. • The result indicates the effectiveness of the policy to counteract the negative influence of energy price escalation. 42% to 27% 10% to 4%

  21. Results: the impact by household type (Scenario 2) • The policy can also neutralize the negative impact of energy prices doubling on the vulnerable households. • This study empirically shows the effectiveness of the alleviation policy as well as the amount of the budget needed to cancel out the impact. 23% to 14% 22% to 14%

  22. Conclusion • This study investigates • the impact of energy price escalation on the Japanese households • the effectiveness of countermeasure (social tariffs) • This study empirically shows • energy price escalation greatly harms Japanese households • especially, low-income and vulnerable households • the effectiveness of countermeasure • the budget required to offset the negative impacts • Future research: definition of energy poverty • a number of problems related to the 10% ratio measure (e.g., Hills, 2012) • plural standards may be needed to reflect regional differences in the country (e.g., climates or prices)

  23. Thank you !

More Related