270 likes | 448 Views
External Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area: Challenges and Trends Rolf Heusser, Switzerland TechnoTN Forum, Brussels, 4 May 2007. Presentation: International dimension of Quality Assurance (QA) External QA in Europe: challenges and trends Future work of QA Agencies.
E N D
External Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area: Challenges and TrendsRolf Heusser, Switzerland TechnoTN Forum, Brussels, 4 May 2007
Presentation: International dimension of Quality Assurance (QA) External QA in Europe: challenges and trends Future work of QA Agencies External Quality Assurance in the EHEA
International dimension of quality assurance Internationalrecognition of qualifications Access to labour market Quality Assurance Accreditation Cross-border education Common HE-area Bologna process Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Role of quality assurance in the Bologna process Berlin communiqué 2003: • Quality (...) has proven to be at the heart of the EHEA • Implementation of national quality assurance systems until 2005 • Including a system of accreditation or comparable procedures • International cooperation and networking Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
National Agencies for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Europe, 2007 Evaluations / Audits Accreditations Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
European Quality labels Label initiatives supported by EU commission: • EUR-ACE: engineering • Eurobachelor and Euromaster in chemistry • European accreditation of informatics programmes • Accreditation in European professional music training • Accreditation of MA in life sciences/rural environment • EFMD initiatives: EPAS, Q3E, Queste, UNIQUe Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Challenges for external QA in Europe • Implementation of European Standards and Guidelines • Removal of barriers in the process of recognition of foreign qualifications • Shift of QA focus: from inputs to learning outcomes • Debate about institutional vs programme approach Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
European Standards and Guidelines for QAAs • ESG for internal and external QA adopted by ministers in Bergen 2005 • A view of what should be done; statements of good practices • Contribution to a common frame of reference in EHEA; prerequisite for entry into planned European register • Peer review of all QA-agencies in next five years Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Recognition of qualifications - current state • Ratification of Lisbon recognition convention does not solve all recognition problems • Still case to case decisions for acceptance of foreign qualifications • Doubts on the quality is a reason on the grounds of which recognition might be denied • Mutual recognition agreements between accreditation agencies should lead to the trust needed to “automatically” recognise accredited foreign study programmes/institutions Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Political Basis for mutual recognition initiatives in Europe • Bologna Ministers Conference, Bergen 2005: „We underline the importance of cooperation between nationally recognised agencies with a view to enhancing the mutual recognition of accreditation or quality assurance decisions“. • European Parliament, 2005: “Hereby recommend that member states... promote cooperation between agencies in order to build up mutual trust and the recognition of QA/accreditation assessments, thus contributing to the recognition of qualifications for the purpose of study or work in another country“. Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
ECA – Foundation and Aim • Consortium of national accreditation organisations • Established in November 2003 • 15 member organisations from 10 European countries: AT, BE, CH, DE, ES, FR, IE, NL, NO, PL • Aim: mutual recognition of accreditation decisions among participating countries until 2007 Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
ECA approach towards Mutual Recognition Government/Recognition bodies Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Learning outcome orientation in external QA • Overarching Qualification Framework (QF) adopted by ministers in Bergen 2005, to be implemented on national level until 2010 (NQF) • QFs are based on learning outcomes, competences and skills • There is a link between NQF and national QA system • New challenge for QAAs: develop learning outcome oriented QA/accreditation systems Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Example of learning outcome oriented accreditation system ABET – programme accreditation checks: • whether study programmes formulate explicit learning outcomes • whether curricula fit to stated learning outcomes • how students can demonstrate competences • if HEI uses assessment results for further improvement of study programmes Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Institutional Assessments – Strengths • Enhancement of institutional quality mechanisms and facilitation of the development of a quality culture • Sustainable effects at the level of institutional management • Assures flexibility and autonomy of HEIs at programme level • Resource saving method Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Programme Assessments – Strengths • Focus on „educational quality“ • Useful information for students/employers • Link to national recognition practices • Direct international comparison of qualifications possible Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Future scenarios for universities and HE OECD Report 2004: • Internationalisation of education will continue • Increased private activities/private funding of HEIs • New providers and new emerging institutions • Increased activities in LLL and in use of ICT • Important role in transfer of knowledge and innovation to society • Increasing autonomy of HEIs Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Future scenarios in HE – Open questions for QAAs • How to assure internationalisation of agencies? • Diversification of activities or staying focused? • What new methodologies are needed to cope with new trends? • How to increase flexibility of the external QA-system? • What is the adequate balance between internal and external quality assurance? Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Requirements for future work of QA-agencies QA-agencies should have the following characteristics: • They are living systems • They need capacity for dynamic change • They need to have self-regulatory power and means to maintain their organisation • They have to exchange with environment • They may produce some heat Heusser/OAQ/May 2007
Conclusions • Quality assurance and accreditation are key elements in the international higher education area • Fair recognition of qualifications is dependent on transparent information about quality • Some progress has been made towards an EHEA, but important challenges for external QA-systems are ahead • HE is moving in Europe and QAAs have to move with it • Independence, capacities for adoptation, mutual trust building with national and international partners are essential elements for future work of agencies Heusser/OAQ/May 2007