1 / 20

Charmonium Decays in CLEO

Charmonium Decays in CLEO. Tomasz Skwarnicki Syracuse University. I will concentrate on the recent results. Separate talk covering Y(4260). CLEO-c Data Samples. By far the largest y (3770) sample

zinna
Download Presentation

Charmonium Decays in CLEO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Charmonium Decays in CLEO Tomasz Skwarnicki Syracuse University I will concentrate on the recent results. Separate talk covering Y(4260).

  2. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki CLEO-c Data Samples • By far the largest y(3770) sample • The y(2S)sample not the largest, but still unique because of the CLEO detector capabilities (excellent tracking, EM calorimeter and PID) J/y(1S) R Ian Shipsey’s talk on Y(4260) E(e+e-) GeV 5.6pb-1, 3M y(2S) 60pb-1, scan 3.97-4.26 GeV 20.7pb-1 continuum below y(2S) 200pb-1 at 4.17 GeV 281pb-1, 1.8M y(3770)

  3. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki cc Photon transitions: y(3770)  gccJ • Rare because GE1~100-102 keV while Gy(3770)DD=25 MeV • Interesting because of well grounded potential model predictions for GE1[y(13D1) gc(13PJ)]: • Is y(3770) a regular cc state? • Effects due to 13D1 - 23S1 mixing? • Reliability of the GE1 predictions for states above the open charm threshold? • Two complementary methods: • ccJ  gJ/y, J/y  e+e-,m+m- • Excellent background suppression but poor sensitivity to cc0 • ccJ  K+K- , K+K-p+p- , p+p-p+p- , p+p-p+p-p+p- • More backgrounds but good sensitivity to cc0 • Total energy-momentum constraints suppress the backgrounds and improve the photon energy resolution • y(2S)  gccJ as control sample n 2S+1 L J y(2S) ccJ y(3770) n=2 2K,2K2p,4p,6p J/y n=1 l+l- S= 0 1 0 1 0 1 L= 0 1 2

  4. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Photon transitions: y(3770)  gccJ CLEO-CONF-06-6 hep-ex/0605070 PRL 96 182002 (06) g hadrons cc0 signal g hadrons y(2S) bkg other bkg

  5. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Photon transitions: y(3770)  gccJ In non-relativistic limit no J-dependence of the E1 matrix element Dominant J-dependence signature of the 13D1 state • y(3770) photon transition rates fit the pattern expected for the 13D1 cc state

  6. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki 23S1 – 13D1 Mixing ? Theoretical curves from the non-relativistic calculations by J. Rosner hep-ph/0411003 CLEO-c results y(2S) y(3770) • No consistent solution can be obtained in the non-relativistic approach • Mixing angle is small

  7. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Importance of relativistic corrections • Non-relativistic calculations overestimate photon transition rates for the charmonium • Qualitatively, potential model predictions work for the 13D1 state equally well as for the 23S1 state Non-relativistic Rosner hep-ph/0411003 Ding,Qin,Chao PRD44,3562(91) Relativistic Based on CLEO-c results (J-averaged) ( GeV-1 ) Eichten,Lane,Quigg PRD69,094019(04) Barnes,Godfrey,Swanson PRD72,054026(05)

  8. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki non-DD decays of y(3770) CLEO PRL,96,082004 (06) • No evidence for anomalously large non-DD component e+e-(2S)  (J/+-) (3770) J/+- missing event energy (GeV) after finding +, -, J/(ll) CLEO PRD,73,012002 (06) (many upper limits presented in this paper too) CLEO-CONF-06-7 CLEO hep/ex-0603026 vs. CLEO PRL,95,121801 (05) CLEO PRL,96,092002 (06) vs. (9 ± 2 ± 6)% BES-II Gang Rong’s talk

  9. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Results relevant for the interpretation of X(3872) • Combining results from the previous slides: • X(3872) cannot be 13D2 cc state! • A moot point by now, since Belle, CDF, BaBar have shown X(3872) is JPC=1++

  10. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki  tag • Ksf (p+p-)(K+K-) D0 M(Ksf) GeV Results relevant for the interpretation of X(3872) • D0 mass: • y(3770) D0D0 • Very small background • D0, Ks, f have small momenta • D0 mass scale well calibrated via Ks, f masses • 1864.85±0.15±0.20 MeV CLEO PRELIMINARY • 1864.5±0.40 MeV PDG’06 fit • 1864.1±1.00 MeV PDG’06 average • MX(3872)-MD0D0*= MX(3872)-(2MD0+DMD0*-D0)= • +0.1±1.0 MeV PDG’06 • -0.4±0.7 MeV PDG’06+CLEO • The error is now limited by the X(3872) mass measurement • Accidental mass coincidence even less likely. D0D0* molecule, other 4-quark state with small binding energy, or a threshold cusp?

  11. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki y(2S) as ccJ factory • e+e−→ y(2S) • 5pb-1, CLEO III+c, 3M y(2S) • by the end of the year×10 • y(2S)→cJ,J=0,1,2 • B~9% each J,“cJ factory” • observed in inclusive analysis • B(cJ→hadrons)are not well known • Selected analyses of cJ hadronic decays: • Channels involving neutrals: • cJ →η(’)η(’) • cJ → h+h−h0,3-body decays, Dalitz plot analysis CLEO PRD,70, 112002 (2004) c1 c0 c2

  12. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki ccJh(’)h(’) B(c0) = 0.31 ± 0.05 ± 0.04 % B(c0//) = 0.18 ± 0.04 ± 0.02 % B(c0/) < 0.05% (90% CL) B(c2) < 0.05% (90% CL) B(c2 //) < 0.03% (90% CL) B(c2/) < 0.023% (90% CL) cc2 CLEO preliminary cc0 cc1 cc1 spin-parity forbidden Theoretical model by:Qiang Zhao, PRD,72,074001(05) BES E835 Fits all r = Double-OZI/Single-OZI

  13. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki cc2 cc2 cc2 cc1 cc1 cc1 cc0 cc0 cc0 Analysis of cJ→h0h+h− • See results on the next slide cc2 cc1 cc0 hpp hpp K0Kp p0KK hKK h’pp p0pp LKp

  14. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Analysis of cJ→h0h+h− CLEO-CONF-06-9 • Most of them are the first observations! • Statistics in c1→hp+p−, K+K−p0, K0sKp sufficient for Dalitz plot analysis of resonant substructure (following slides) (in %) CLEO PRELIMINARY (upper limits at 90% C.L.)

  15. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Dalitz plot analysis of c1→hp+p− • May offer the best way to determine a0(980) parameters in the future • 10x increase in statistics expected this year f2(1270) CLEO PRELIMINARY a0(980) a0(980)

  16. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Dalitz plot analysis of c1→ K+K−p0 • Analyzed together with K0sKp • see the next slide for the fit results K*(892) K*(1430) a0(980) K*(892) K*(1430)

  17. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Dalitz plot analysis of c1→ K0sKp CLEO PRELIMINARY • K*(892)K,a0(980)p clearly seen • Need more data to sort out other contributions KKp fit results K*(892) K*(1430) Model dependent a0(980) K*(892) K*(1430)

  18. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Search for y(2S) →hc(1S) p+p-p0 • B(y(2S) →hc p+p-p0) < 0.1% (90% C.L.) • Rules out “survival before annihilation” model by P.Artoisenet et al. PLB,628,211 (05) invented to explain the “rp puzzle” (predicted B > 1%) CLEO PRELIMINARY MC CLEO CLNS 06/1965 data hc→ K+K-p0, p+p-h, K+K-K+K-, p+p-p+p-, K0K-p+ hc

  19. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Analysis of y(2S) → 2 pseudo-scalars CLEO hep-ex/0603020 CLEO-CONF-06-8 • Confirm BES results • The phase difference D between the EM and strong amplitudes around 90o, which is consistent with the J/y value, contrary to some theoretical speculations that it might be very different

  20. Charmonium in CLEO ICHEP'06 Moscow Tomasz Skwarnicki Summary • Potential models predict GE1for y(3770)  gccJ equally well as for y(2S)  gccJ • No evidence for anomalously high y(3770)  non-DD • y(3770) appears to be standard 13D1 cc state with a small admixture of 23S1 • Preliminary precision measurement of D0 mass improves MX(3872)-MD0D0*determination to -0.4±0.7 MeV • Vast improvement in measurements of exclusive hadronic decay modes of the ccJ states. • An order of magnitude increase in y(2S) statistics (x10) expected soon. Significant improvement in y(3770) statistics (x3) expected by 2008.

More Related